Abstract
In the present paper it is argued that genetic interventions on human embryos are in principle permissible if they promote the health of the persons that these embryos will one day become and impermissible if they compromise their health. This so called health-intervention principle is reached by, inter alia, rejecting alternative approaches to the problem of the permissibility of genetic intervention. The health-intervention principle can be interpreted in different ways depending on how the notion of health is understood. The central part of the paper is an attempt to find a concept of health which is such that it makes the health-intervention principle normatively plausible. For this purpose I examine two influential competing theories of health: Cristopher Boorse’s biostatistical theory of health and Lennart Nordenfelt’s welfare theory of health. I argue that the health-intervention principle is more plausible if health is understood in the latter sense, although it is not ruled out that the principle may be given an even more plausible explication in terms of some other notion of health.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
N. Agar (1999) ‘Liberal Eugenics’ H. Kushe P. Singer (Eds) Bioethics: An Anthology Blackwell Oxford 171–181
C. Boorse (1977) ArticleTitleHealth as a Theoretical Concept Philosophy of Science 44 542–573 Occurrence Handle10.1086/288768
B. Brülde (1998) Vad är hälsa? Några reflektioner kring häslobegreppet. [What Is Health? Some Reflections on the Notion of Health.] Department of Philosophy, University of Gothenburg Gothenburg
B. Brülde P.-A. Tengland (2003) Hälsa och sjukdom – en begreppslig utredning. [Health and Disease – A Conceptual Clarification.] Studentlitteratur Lund
A. Buchanan D.W. Brock N. Daniels D. Wilker (2000) From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice Cambridge University Press Cambridge
Habermas, J.: 2003, The Future of Human Nature (Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik?, 2001), Translated by Rehg, W., M. Pensky and H. Beister, Cambridge: Polity Press.
J. Harris (1998) Clones, Genes, and Immortality. Ethics and the Genetic Revolution Oxford University Press Oxford
J. Harris (1999) ‘Is Gene Therapy a Form of Eugenics?’ H. Kushe P. Singer (Eds) Bioethics: An Anthology Blackwell Oxford 165–170
P. Kitcher (1996) The Lives to Come: The Genetic Revolution and Human Possibilities Allen Lane The Penguin Press London
L. Nordenfelt (1995) On the Nature of Health: An Action-Theoretic Approach. Second Revised and Enlarged Edition Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht
L. Nordenfelt (2000) Action, Ability and Health: Essays in the Philosophy of Action and Welfare Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht
Nordenfelt, L., with contributions of G. Khushf and K.W.M. Fulford: 2001, Health, Science, and Ordinary Language. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
R. Nozick (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia Basic Books New York
Oxford English Dictionary, vol. IX. 1993, Oxford: Clarendon.
J. Sahlin (1994) Hälso- och sjukvårdslagen. Med kommentarer. Fjärde upplagan. [The Health Care Act. With Comments] EditionNumber4 Fritzes Stockholm
M. Smith (1994) The Moral Problem Blackwell Oxford
J.M. Torres (2002) ArticleTitleThe Importance of Genetic Services for the Theory of Health: A Basis for an Integrating View of Health Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 43–51 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1014280007453
I.-B. Täljedal (2004) ArticleTitleStrong Holism, Weak Holism, and Health Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 7 143–148 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:MHEP.0000034320.45018.d8
L. Walters J.G. Palmer (1997) The Ethics of Human Gene Therapy Oxford University Press New York
K. Zeiler (2003) ‘Transgressive Technologies in Reproductive Medicine: Do They Call for a Revision of Notions of Health?’ L. Nordenfelt P.-E. Liss (Eds) Dimensions of Health and Health Promotion Rodopi Amsterdam 133–148
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malmqvist, E. The Notion of health and the morality of genetic intervention. Med Health Care Philos 9, 181–192 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-005-5643-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-005-5643-4