Skip to main content
Log in

What does Heidegger have to do with an east-west dialogue?

  • Special Topic: Heidegger and East-West Dialogue
  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bernasconi, Robert. 1995. “On Heidegger’s Other Sins of Omission—His Exclusion of Asian Thought from the Origins of Occidental Metaphysics and His Denial of the Possibility of Christian Philosophy.”American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 69:333–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botz-Bornstein, Thorsten. 1997. “‘Iki’, Style, Trace: Schuzo Kuki and the Spirit of Hermeneutics.”Philosophy East & West 47: 554–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denker, Alfred. 2000.Historical Dictionary of Heidegger’s Philosophy. Lanham/London: The Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilworth, David A., ed. 1998.Sourcebook for Modern Japanese Philosophy: Selected Documents. Connecticut: Greenwood Westport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenberg, Andrew. 1999.Questioning Technolog. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1956.What is Philosophy? Schenectady, NY: The New College and University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1959.Unterwegs zur Sprache. Stuttgart: Günther Neske.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1968.What is Called Thinking. Trans. by J. G. Gray. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1971. “A Dialogue on Language: Between a Japanese and an Inquirer.” InOn the Way to Language. Trans. by P. D. Hertz. San Francisco: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1979.Heraklit. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. 55. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1993.Basic Writings. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1994.Bremer und Freiburger Vorträge. Gesamtausgabe. Vol. 79. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2000.Elucidations of Hölderlin’s Poetry. Trans. by K. Hoeller. Amherst NY: Humanity Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heine, Steven. 1990. “The Flower Blossoms ‘Without Why’: Beyond the Heidegger-Kuki Dialogue on Contemplative Language.”Eastern Buddhist 23: 60–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, Paul Shih-yi. 1987. “Heidegger and Our Translation of theToo Te Ching.” In Parkes 1987a.

  • Kimmerle, Heinz. 2002. “Dialogue is a Form of Intercultural Philosophy.” Lecture delivered at the Institute of Philosophy, University of Leuven.

  • Kuki, Shuzo. 1997.Reflections on Japanese Taste. The Structure of Iki. Trans. by J. Clark. Sydney: Power Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maraldo, John C. 1990. “Review of Heidegger and Asian Thought.”Philosophy East & West 40:100–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, Reinhard. 1989.Ex Oriente Lux. Heideggers Werk unter ostasiatischem Einfluss. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1996.Heidegger’s Hidden Sources: East Asian Influences on His Work. Trans. by G. Parkes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohashi, Ryôsuke. 1989. “Die frühe Heidegger-Rezeption in Japan.” InJapan und Heidegger. Gedenkschrift der Stadt Meβkirch zum hundersten Geburtstag Martin Heideggers, edited by H. Buchner. Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, Graham, ed. 1987a.Heidegger and Asian Thought. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, Graham, 1987b. “Afterwords-Language.” In Parkes 1987a.

  • -. 1996. “Translator’s Preface.” In May 1996.

  • —. 1997. “Review ofAuthenticating Culture in Imperial Japan: Kuki Shuzo and the Rise of National Aesthetics.”Chanoyu Quarterly 86: 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 2003. “Lao-Zhuang and Heidegger on Nature and Technology.”Journal of Chinese Philosophy 30: 19–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petzet, Heinrich Wiegand. 1983.Encounters and Dialogues with Martin Heidegger 1929–1976. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pincus, Leslie. 1996.Authenticating Culture in Imperial Japan: Kuki Shuzo and the Rise of National Aesthetics. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pöggeler, Otto. 1987. “West-East Dialogue: Heidegger and Lao-tzu.” In Parkes 1987a.

  • Sakai, Naoki. 1997.Translation & Subjectivity: On “Japan” and Cultural Nationalism. London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandford, Stella. 2003. “Going-Back: Heidegger, East Asian and ‘The West’.”Radical Philosophy: A Journal of Socialist and Feminist philosophy. No. 120 (July/August): 11–22.

  • Stambaugh, Joan. 1990.Impermanence is Buddha-Nature. Dogen’s Understanding of Temporality. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tezuka, Tomio. 1996. “An Hour with Heidegger.” In May 1996: 59–64.

  • Wang, Qingjie (James). 2001. “Heng and Temporality ofDao: Laozi and Heidegger.”Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 1. 1: 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Edward Q. 2002. “Time, History, and Dao: Zhang Xuecheng and Martin Heidegger.”Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 1. 2: 251–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlfart, Guenter. 2003. “Heidegger and Laozi:Wu (Nothing) on Chapter II of theDaodejing.Journal of Chinese Philosophy 30: 39–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Xianglong. 1996.Heidegger’s Thought and the Chinese Heavenly Dao. Beijing: Sanlian Shudian.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ma Lin Ph.D. Candidate.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lin, M. What does Heidegger have to do with an east-west dialogue?. Dao 4, 299–319 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02856732

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02856732

Keywords

Navigation