Skip to main content
Log in

Is There a “Pessimistic” Bias in Individual Beliefs? Evidence from a Simple Survey

  • Published:
Theory and Decision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is an important issue for economic and finance applications to determine whether individuals exhibit a behavioral bias toward pessimism in their beliefs, in a lottery or more generally in an investment opportunities framework. In this paper, we analyze the answers of a sample of 1,540 individuals to the following question “Imagine that a coin will be flipped 10 times. Each time, if heads, you win \(10\texttt{C}\!\!\!\rule[2.3pt]{.4em}{.3pt}\!\!\rule[3.3pt]{.4em}{.3pt}\). How many times do you think that you will win?” The average answer is surprisingly about 3.9 which is below the average 5, and we interpret this as a pessimistic bias. We find that women are more “pessimistic” than men, as are old people relative to young. We also analyze how our notion of pessimism is related to more general notions of pessimism previously introduced in psychology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abarbanell J., Lehavy R. (2003). Biased precasts or biased earnings; The role of reported earnings, in explaining apparent bias and over/under- reaction in analysts earnings precasts. Journal of Accounting and Economics 36, 105–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abel A.B. (2002). An exploration of the effects of pessimism and doubt on asset returns. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 26, 1075–7092

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Affleck-Graves J., Davis L.R., Mendenhall R.R. (1990). Forecasts of earnings per share: Possible sources of analyst superiority. Contemporary Accounting Research 6(2):501–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beattie J., Loomes G. (1997). The impact of incentives upon risky choice experiments. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 14, 155–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calegari M., Fargher N.L. (1997) Evidence that prices do not fully reflect the implications of current earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research 14(3):397–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer C., Hogarth R. (1999). The effects of financial incentives in experiments: a Review and capital-labor-production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, 7–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darrough M.N., Russell T. (2002). A positive model of earnings forecasts: Top down versus bottom up. Journal of Business 75(1):127–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreman D.N., Berry M. (1995). Analyst forecasting errors and their implications for security analysts. Financial Analysts Journal 51, 30–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis J., Philbrick D. (1993). Analysts’ decisions as products of a multi-task environment. Journal of Accounting Research 31, 216–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fried D., Givoly D. (1982). Financial analysts’ forecasts of earnings: A better surrogate for earnings expectations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 4, 85–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillette A., Stevens D., Watts S., Williams A. (1999). Price and reactions to public information releases: An experimental approach incorporating traders’ subjective beliefs. Contemporary Accounting Research 16(3):437–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giordani P., Söderlind P. (2006). Is there evidence of pessimism and doubt in subjective distributions? Implications for the risk premium puzzle. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 30, 1027–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartog J., Carbonnel A.F., Jonker N. (2002). Linking measured risk aversion to individual characteristics. Kyklos 55, 3–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jouini E., Napp C. (2006). Heterogeneous beliefs and asset pricing in discrete time. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 30, 1233–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph R., Larrick R.P., Steele C.M., Nisbett R.E. (1996). Protecting the self from the negative consequences of risky decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62, 26–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang S., O’Brien J., Sivaramakrishnan K. (1994) Analysts’ interim earnings forecasts: Evidence on the forecasting process. Journal of Accounting Research 32, 103–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maines L.A., Hand J.R.M. (1996) Individuals’ perceptions and misperceptions of time series properties of quarterly earnings. The Accounting Review 71(3):317–336

    Google Scholar 

  • McNichols M., O’Brien P.C. (1997). Self-selection and analyst coverage. Journal of Accounting Research 35, 167–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehra R., Prescott E. (1985). The equity premium: A puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics 15, 145–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien P.C. (1988) Analysts forecasts as earnings expectations. Journal of Accounting and Economics 10, 53–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritov I. (1996). Probability of regret: Anticipation of uncertainty resolution in choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 66, 228–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schipper K. (1991) Commentary on analysts’ forecasts. Accounting Horizons 5, 105–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens D.E., Williams A.W. (2003) Inefficiency in earnings forecasts: Experimental evidence of reactions to positive vs. negative information. Experimental Economics 1(7):75–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S. (1991). Asymmetric effects of positive and negative events: The mobilization-minimization hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin 110(1):67–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil P. (1989). The equity premium puzzle and the risk-free rate puzzle. Journal of Monetary Economics 24, 401–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenglert L., Rosen A.S. (2000) Measuring optimism-pessimism from beliefs about future events. Personality and Individual Differences 28, 717–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elyès Jouini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mansour, S.B., Jouini, E. & Napp, C. Is There a “Pessimistic” Bias in Individual Beliefs? Evidence from a Simple Survey. Theor Decis 61, 345–362 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-006-9014-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-006-9014-2

Keywords

Navigation