Skip to main content
Log in

A Framework for Ethical Conformity in Marketing

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The extant marketing literature provides little guidance for theory development or practice with regard to questions of ethical conformity and the resulting market response. To begin to bridge this research gap, we advance a theoretical framework of ethical conformity in marketing, appealing to marketing ethics, management strategy, and sociological foundations. We set the stage for our theoretical arguments by considering the role of normative expectations related to marketing practices and behaviors held by societal constituents. Against this backdrop, we propose drivers of conformity in marketing, including practices consistent with both overconformity and underconformity. The framework allows us to advance testable research propositions by which questions of ethical conformity may be explored. We conclude by suggesting additional future research needed to develop the domain, specifically in the form of empirical inquiries uncovering firm strategic decisions with ethical implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albert D. A., S. Whetten 1985 Organizational Identity. In: L. L. Cummings, B. M. Staw (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol. 7. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 263–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht K., L. McIntyre 2005, Spychips: How Major Corporations and Government Plan to Track Your Every Move with RFID. Nelson Current, Nashville, TN

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum J. A. C., C. Oliver 1991 Institutional Linkages and Organizational Mortality. Administrative Science Quarterly 36(June), 187–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer L., R. Chandler, O. C. Ferrell 2006. Managing Risks for Corporate Integrity: How to Survive an Ethical Misconduct Disaster. Thomson, Mason, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown T. J., P. A. Dacin, M. G. Pratt, D. A. Whetten 2006 Identity, Intended Image, Construed Image, and Reputation: An Interdisciplinary Framework and Suggested Terminology. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(2), 99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse D. L. 1999 To Be Different, Or To Be the Same? It’s A Question (And Theory) of Strategic Balance. Strategic Management Journal 20(February), 147–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio P. J., W. W. Powell 1983 The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Behavior. American Sociological Review 48(April), 147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee T. W., N. C. Smith, W. T. Ross Jr. 1999 Social Contracts and Marketing Ethics. Journal of Marketing 63(July), 14–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engardio P. 2007 Beyond the Green Corporation. Business Week January 29, 50–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O. C.: 2007, ‹Nature and Scope of Marketing Ethics’, in W. Wilkie, G. T. Gundlach and L. Block (eds.), Explorations of Marketing in Society (Thomson-Southwestern, Ohio), 858–875

  • Gioia D. A., M. Schultz, K. G. Corley 2000 Organizational Identity, Image, and Adaptive Instability. Academy Management Review 25(January), 63–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal R., J. M. Comer, R. Mehta 2001 An Investigation into the Antecedents and Consequences of Organizational Participation in Business-to-Business Electronic Markets. Journal of Marketing 65(July), 17–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal R., R. Dharwadkar 2002 The Role of the Institutional Environment in Marketing Channels. Journal of Marketing 66(July), 82–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Handelman J. M. 2006 Corporate Identity and the Societal Constituent. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 34(2), 107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckert D. M. 1998 Positive Deviance: A Classificatory Model. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology 26, 23–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckert A., D. M. Heckert 2002 A New Typology of Deviance: Integrating Normative and Reactivist Definitions of Deviance. Deviant Behavior 23, 449–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laczniak G. R., P. E. Murphy 2006 Marketing, Consumers, and Technology: Perspectives for Enhancing Ethical Transactions. Business Ethics Quarterly 16(July), 313–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton R. K. 1938 Social Structure and Anomie. American Sociological Review 3, 672–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton R. K. 1968 Social Theory and Social Structure. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy P. E., G. R. Laczniak, N. E. Bowie, T. A. Klein 2005 Ethical Marketing: Basic Ethics in Action. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Pólos L, M. T. Hannan, G. R. Carroll 2002 Foundations of a Theory of Social Forms. Industrial and Corporate Change 11(1), 85–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selznick P. 1984 Leadership in Administration. Peterson, Evanston, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Simöes C, S. Dibb, R. P. Fisk 2005 Managing Corporate Identity: An Internal Perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 33(Spring), 153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith N. C. 1993 Ethics and the Marketing Manager. In: N. C. Smith, J. A. Quelch (eds.), Ethics in Marketing. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL, pp 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer G. M., S. Sonenshein 2004 Toward the Construct Definition of Positive Deviance. American Behavioral Scientist 47, 828–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman M. C. 1995 Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review 20(July), 571–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C., P. Kaihla, C. Hawn, T. McNichol, M. Myser, S. Durst, M. Lev-Ram and M. V. Copeland: 2007, ‹Go Green. Get Rich’, Business 2.0 8(1), 68–77

  • Warren D. E. 2003 Constructive and Destructive Deviance in Organizations. Academy of Management Review 28(4), 622–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful for the collective feedback of participants at the Excellence in Ethics Dissertation Proposal Competition sponsored by the Institute for Ethical Business Worldwide and the Mendoza College of Business at the University of Notre Dame. Special thanks are due to Patrick E. Murphy and Ann Tenbrunsel for their valuable comments and suggestions that have improved this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kelly D. Martin.

Additional information

Kelly D. Martin is Assistant Professor of Marketing at Colorado State University in Fort Collins, Colorado. Her research interests involve marketing strategy with ethical implications, interfirm relationships, the role of marketing in society, and the effects of institutions, social norms, and culture on organizations. Her work has appeared in the Academy of Management Journal, the Journal of Business Ethics, and Business & Society.

Jean L. Johnson is the Gardner O. Hart Professor of Marketing at Washington State University in Pullman, Washington. Her research focuses on marketing strategy, interfirm relationships, and capabilities and learning in firms. Her work appears in the Journal of Marketing, the Academy of Management Journal, and Journal of International Business Studies, among others.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martin, K.D., Johnson, J.L. A Framework for Ethical Conformity in Marketing. J Bus Ethics 80, 103–109 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9444-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9444-y

Keywords

Navigation