Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cacogenic Cartographies: Space and Place in the Eugenic Family Study

  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Though only one component product of the larger eugenics movement, the eugenic family study proved to be, by far, its most potent ideological tool. The Kallikak Family, for instance, went through eight editions between 1913 and 1931. This essay argues that the current scholarship has missed important ways that the architects of the eugenic family studies theorized and described the subjects of their investigation. Using one sparsely interrogated work (sociologist Frank Wilson Blackmar’s “The Smoky Pilgrims”) and one previously unknown eugenic family study (biologist Frank Gary Brooks’ untitled analysis of the flood-zone Oklahomans) from the Southern Plains, this essay aims to introduce “environment” as a schema that allows for how the subjects of the eugenic family study were conceptualized with respect to their surroundings. Geospatially and environmentally relevant constructions of scientific knowledge were central to the project of eugenics during its formative years, but remain largely and conspicuously absent from the critical literature which engages this project to separate the fit from the unfit in American society. The dysgenic constituted a unique human geography, giving us significant insight into how concatenations of jurisprudence as well as cultural and social worth were tied to the land.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, Garland. 1991. “Old Wine in New Bottles: From Eugenics to Population Control in the World of Raymond Pearl.” Keith Benson, Jane Maienschein, Ronald Rainger (eds.), The Expansion of American biology. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Garland. 2012. “‘Culling the Herd’: Eugenics and the Conservation Movement in the United States, 1900–1940.” Journal of the History of Biology 42: 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bird, Roy and Wallace, Douglass. 1976. Witness of the Times: A History of Shawnee County. Topeka: Shawnee County Historical Society, pp. 277–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bix, Amy Sue. 1997. “Experiences and Voices of Eugenics Field-Workers: ‘Women’s Work’ in Biology.” Social Studies of Science 27(4): 625–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmar, Frank Wilson. 1897. “The Smoky Pilgrims.” American Journal of Sociology 2(4): 485–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Frank Gary. 1931. “Selling the Future Short.” Bios 2(3): 151–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caron, Simone M. 2008. Who Chooses? American Reproductive History Since 1830. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, Allan. 1997. The Legacy of Malthus: The Social Costs of the New Scientific Racism. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clauser-Roemer, Kendra. 2000. “What Indiana Can Do: The Influence of Female Field Workers.” Indiana Magazine of History 106(3): 246–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comfort, Nathaniel. 2012. The Science of Human Perfection: How Genes Became the Heart of American Medicine. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Connelly, Matthew. 2008. Fatal Misconception: The Struggle to Control World Population. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Thomas C. 1982. Blacks in Topeka, Kansas, 1865–1915: A Social History. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, David. 1998. Race, Place, and the Law, 1836–1948. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, Matthew. 2016. Evicted: Poverty and Profit in the American City. New York: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eugenics Records Office. 1920. State expenses for maintaining state institutions for the socially inadequate classes, 1916. Eugenical News 5. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory.

  • Fiege, Mark. 2012. The Republic of Nature. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer, James. 1894. The Golden Bough: A Study in Comparative Religion. London :MacMillan and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelb, Steven. 1985. “Myths, Morons, Psychologists: The Kallikak Family Revisited.” The Review of Education 11(4): 255–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelb, Steven. 1990. “Degeneracy Theory, Eugenics, and Family Studies.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences 26: 242–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelb, Steven. 1995. “The Beast in Man: Degenerationism and Mental Retardation, 1900–1920.” Mental Retardation 33(1): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, Mark. 1983. Eugenics: Hereditarian Attitudes in American Thought. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, Derek. 2012. The State and the Stork: The Population Debate and Policymaking in United States History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, Howard L. 1985. The Social Meaning of Modern Biology: From Social Darwinism to Sociobiology. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles, Daniel J. 1985. In the Name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingle, Matthew. 2006. “Changing Spaces: Nature, Property, and Power in Seattle, 1880–1945.” The Journal of Urban History 32(2): 197–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluchin, Rebecca M. 2011. Fit to Be Tied: Sterilization and Reproductive Rights in America, 1950–1980. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayashi, Audrey. 2003. “The Construction of Geographic Knowledge—Racialization, Spatialization.” K Anderson, M Domosh, S Pile and N Thrift (eds.), Handbook of Cultural Geography. London: Sage, pp. 544–556.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Linner, Bjorn-Ola. 2003. The Return of Malthus: Environmentalism and Post-war Population-Resource Crises. Strond: White Horse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, Paul A. 2008. Three generations, no Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, Paul A. Ed. 2011. A Century of Eugenics in America: From the Indiana Experiment to the Human Genome Era. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

  • Mitman, Gregg. 2005. “In search of Health: Landscape and Disease in American Environmental History.” Environmental History 10(2): 184–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitman, Gregg. 2007. Breathing Space: How Allergies Shape Our Lives and Landscapes. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Michelle. 2006. Sick Building Syndrome and the Problem of Uncertainty. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Painter, Nell Irvin. 1977. Exodusters: Black Migration to Kansas After Reconstruction. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Diane. 1995. Controlling Human Heredity: 1865 to the Present. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, Fred. 2010. The Coming Population Crash and Our Planet’s Surprising Future. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porterfield, Arthur L. 1930. “Look, Legislators!” Daily Oklahoman.

  • Potter, George Edwin. 1947. Textbook of Zoology. St. Louis: Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafter, Nicole Hahn 1988. White Trash: The Eugenic Family Studies, 1877–1919. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

  • Rafter, Nicole Hahn. 1988. White Trash: The Eugenic Family Studies, 1877–1919. Boston :Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafter, Nicole Hahn. 1997. Creating Born Criminals. Urbana/Champagne: Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Thomas. 2012a. Malthusian Moment: Global Population Growth and the Birth of American Environmentalism. Piscataway, NJ :Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, Thomas. 2012b. “Total War and the Total Environment.” Environmental History 17: 336–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Harold M. 1972. “The Spatial Development of Black Residential Subsystems.” Economic Geography 48(1): 43–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J David. 1985. Minds Made Feeble: The Myth and Legacy of the Kallikaks. Rockville, MD: Aspen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Phil. 1999. “Drawing New Maps: A Radical Cartography of Developmental Disabilities.” Review of Educational Research 69(2): 117–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiro, Jonathan. 2009. Defending the Master Race: Conservation, Eugenics, and the Legacy of Madison Grant. Burlington, VT: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Alexandra Minna. 2012. Telling Genes: The Story of Genetic Counseling in America. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swan, Robert Austin. 1974. The Ethnic Heritage of Topeka: Immigrant Beginnings. Kansas City: Topeka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tylor, EB. 1871. Primitive Culture: Researches into the Development of Mythology, Philosophy, Religion, Art, and Custom. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenderland, Leila. 1987. “The Debate Over Diagnosis: Henry Herbert Goddard and the Medical Acceptance of Intelligence Testing.” Michael M Sokal (ed.), Psychological Testing and American Society 1890–1930. Piscataway, NJ: Rutgers University Press, pp. 46–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenderland, Leila. 1998. Measuring Minds: Henry Herbert Goddard and the Origins of American Intelligence Testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA

    Ry Marcattilio-McCracken

Authors
  1. Ry Marcattilio-McCracken
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ry Marcattilio-McCracken.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marcattilio-McCracken, R. Cacogenic Cartographies: Space and Place in the Eugenic Family Study. J Hist Biol 50, 497–524 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-016-9452-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-016-9452-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation