Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T09:05:40.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Currents in Contemporary Ethics: Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Is it the Practice of Medicine?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Cynthia Marietta  and
Amy L. McGuire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Understanding of the human genome and its functional significance has increased exponentially since the completion of the Human Genome Project (HGP) in 2003. The HGP fueled the discovery of more than 1,800 disease genes and paved the way for researchers to identify and test for genes suspected of causing inherited diseases. Currently, there are more than 1000 genetic tests for human diseases and conditions on the market. These tests can play an integral role in the delivery of health care by providing information that could potentially form the basis for profound life decisions, such as whether to undergo a prophylactic mastectomy, whether to terminate a pregnancy, or whether to take a particular drug or medication dose.

Type
JLME Column
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , Summer 2009 , pp. 369 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

National Institutes of Health, National Human Genome Research Institute, “All About the Human Genome Project,” available at <http://www.genome.gov/l0001772> (last visited March 12, 2009).+(last+visited+March+12,+2009).>Google Scholar
Genetics and Public Policy Center, “Genetic Testing Quality Initiative,” available at <http://www.dnapolicy.org> (last visited April 9, 2009); Javitt, G. H. and Hudson, K., “Federal Neglect: Regulation of Genetic Testing,” Issues in Sciences and Technology 27, no. 3 (2006): 59–66, at 59.Google Scholar
Genetics and Public Policy Center, “Publication Announcement: Comparison of State Laws for Direct-to-Consumer Testing,” available at <http://www.dnapolicy.org> (last visited April 9, 2009).+(last+visited+April+9,+2009).>Google Scholar
Langreth, R., “California Orders Stop to Gene Testing,” Forbes.Com, June 14, 2008, available at <www.forbes.com/2008/06/14/stopgene-testing-biz-healthcare> (last visited on April 9, 2009).+(last+visited+on+April+9,+2009).>Google Scholar
Genetics and Public Policy Center, “Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Companies,” available at <http://www.dnapolicy.org> (last visited April 9, 2009).+(last+visited+April+9,+2009).>Google Scholar
Prainsack, B. and Reardon, J., “Misdirected Precaution,” Nature 456 (2008): 34–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genetic Alliance, “Promotion of Genetic Testing Services Directly to Consumers,” available at <http://www.geneticalliance.org> (last visited April 9, 2009).+(last+visited+April+9,+2009).>Google Scholar
McGuire, A. L., Diaz, C. M., Wang, T. and Hilsenbeck, S. G., “Social Networkers' Attitudes toward Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing,” American Journal of Bioethics (forthcoming July 2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. A., McEwen, J. E., Barton, J. C. and Walker, A. P. et al., “Concerns in a Primary Care Population About Genetic Discrimination by Insurers,” General Medicine 7, no. 5 (2005): 311–316.Google Scholar
H.R. 493, Genetic Information Non-discrimination Act of 2008, available at <http://www.genome.gov/24519851> (last visited March 12, 2009).+(last+visited+March+12,+2009).>Google Scholar
See Genetic Alliance, supra note 7.Google Scholar
Federal Trade Commission, “At Home Genetic Tests: A Healthy Dose of Skepticism May Be the Best Prescription,” available at <http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer/health/hea02.shtm> (last visited April 9, 2009); see also U.S. National Library of Medicine, “What Do the Results of Genetic Testing Mean?” available at <http://ghr.nlrn.nih.gov/handbook/testing/interpretingresults> (last visited April 9, 2009).+(last+visited+April+9,+2009);+see+also+U.S.+National+Library+of+Medicine,+“What+Do+the+Results+of+Genetic+Testing+Mean?”+available+at++(last+visited+April+9,+2009).>Google Scholar
See Federal Trade Commission, supra note 12; see also U.S. National Library of Medicine, supra note 12.Google Scholar
See U.S. National Library of Medicine, supra note 12.Google Scholar
23 and Me, “23 and Me Terms of Service,” available at <http://spittoon.23andme.com/terms-of-service> (last visited April 9, 2009).+(last+visited+April+9,+2009).>Google Scholar
23 and Me, , available at <http://www.23andme.com> (last visited April 9, 2009).CrossRef+(last+visited+April+9,+2009).>Google Scholar
Hunter, D. J., Khoury, M. J. and Drazen, J. M., “Letting the Genome Out of the Bottle: Will We Get Our Wish?” New England Journal of Medicine 358, no. 2 (2008): 105–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American College of Medical Genetics, “ACMG Statement on Direct-To-Consumer Testing,” available at <http://www.geneticsinmedicine.org> (last visited April 9, 2009).+(last+visited+April+9,+2009).>Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Correspondence between SACGHS and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, available at <http://oba.od.nih.gov/SACGHS/sacghs_documents.html> (last visited April 9, 2009).+(last+visited+April+9,+2009).>Google Scholar
See Federal Trade Commission, supra note 12.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Medical News Today, “American Medical Association Adopts New Direct-To-Consumer Policy Recommendations,” August 14, 2008, available at <http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/118231.php> (last visited on April 9, 2009).+(last+visited+on+April+9,+2009).>Google Scholar
Certain web sites provide a listing of the various state laws that define the practice of medicine. See American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, “Definition of the Practice of Medicine: A State-by-State Survey,” available at <https://www.aapl.org/state_law_prac_med.htm (last visited April 9, 2009).Google Scholar
For instance, the statutes regulating the practice of medicine in the States of California, Florida, Illinois, New York, and Texas contain a combination of these words.Google Scholar
Hurley v. People, 63 P.2d 1227, 1229–1230 (Colo. 1936); Underwood v. Scott, 23 P. 942, 943 (Kan. 1890).Google Scholar
Hurley, 63 P.2d at 1229.Google Scholar
Curley v. State, 16 So.2d 440, 440–41 (Fla. 1944).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See, e.g., Hernon v. EG Corrigan Constr. Co., 595 N.E.2d 561, 562 (Ill. 1992).Google Scholar
Webster's New International Dictionary (3d ed. 1993): 622; see also Curley, , supra note 27.Google Scholar
Nunnally, A. C., “Commercialized Genetic Testing: The Role of Corporate Biotechnology in the New Genetic Age,” Boston University Journal of Science & Technology Law 8, no. 1 (2002): 306–346, at 326.Google Scholar
Han, J., “The Optimal Scope of FDA Regulation of Genetic Tests: Meeting Challenges and Keeping Promises,” Harvard Journal of Law & Technology 20, no. 2 (2007): 423–441, at 434.Google Scholar
See Nunnally, , supra note 31.Google Scholar
United States Government Accountability Office, Nutrigenetic Testing: Tests Purchased from Four Web Sites Mislead Consumers, July 27, 2006, available at <http://www.gao.gov> (lasted visited April 9, 2009).+(lasted+visited+April+9,+2009).>Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See, e.g., web site of 23 and Me, Inc., available at <https://www.23andme.com/howitworks>; web site of Sciona, Inc., available at <http://www.mycelldnafitness.com/legal.aspx>; web site of deCodeme, available at <http://www.decodeme.com/faq>. (All last visited April 9, 2009).;+web+site+of+Sciona,+Inc.,+available+at+;+web+site+of+deCodeme,+available+at+.+(All+last+visited+April+9,+2009).>Google Scholar
See McQuire, et al., supra note 8.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. H., “Healing at the Borderland of Medicine and Religion: Regulating Potential Abuse or Authority by Spiritual Healers,” Journal of Law and Religion 18, no. 2 (2002): 373–426, at 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGuire, A. L. and Burke, W., “An Unwelcome Side Effect of Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing: Raiding the Medical Commons,” JAMA 300, no. 22 (2008): 2669–2671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See 42 C.F.R. Part 493 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Report of the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society, U.S. System of Oversight of Genetic Testing: A Response to the Charge of the Secretary of Health and Human Services, April 2008, available at <http://www4.od.nih.gov/oba/sacghs/reports/SACGHS_oversight_report.pdf. (last visited April 9, 2009).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Navigenics, “Terms of Services,” available at <http://www.navigenics.com/visitor/what_we_offer/our_policies/terms_conditions> (last visited April 9, 2009).+(last+visited+April+9,+2009).>Google Scholar
ABIM, ACP-ASIM Foundation, European Federation of Internal Medicine, “Medical Professionalism in the New Millenium: A Physician Charter,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons 196, no. 1 (2003):115–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See generally Bovara v. St. Francis Hosp., 700 N.E.2d 143 (Ill. App. Ct. 1998); Corbet v. McKinney, 980 S.W.2d 166 (Mo. 1998); Irvin v. Smith, 31 P.3d 934 (Kan. 2001); Kelley v. Middle Tennessee Emergency Physicians, 133 S.W.3d 587 (Tenn. 2004); Lownesbury v. Van Buren, 762 N.E.2d 354 (Ohio 2002); Raptis-Smith v. St. Joseph's Medical Ctr., 755 N.Y.S.2d 384 (N.Y. App. Div. 2003); Sterling v. Johns Hopkins Hosp., 802 A.2d 440 (Md. 2002); St. John v. Pope, 901 S.W.2d 420 (Tex. 1995); Walters v. Rinker, 520 N.E.2d 468 (Ind. 1988).Google Scholar
See generally Bovara, 700 N.E.2d at 143; Corbet, 980 S.W.2d at 166; Irvin, 31 P.3d at 934; Kelley, 133 S.W.3d at 587; Lownesbury, 762 N.E.2d at 354; Sterling, 802 A.2d at 440; St. John, 901 S.W.2d at 420; Walters, 520 N.E.2d at 468.Google Scholar
See Walters, , 520 N.E.2d at 472.Google Scholar
Id. at 472; see also Dougherty v. Gifford, 826 S.W.2d 668, 675 (Tex. App. – Texarkana 1992, no writ).Google Scholar
St. John, 901 S.W.2d at 424.Google Scholar
Dougherty, 826 S.W.2d at 675 (concerning a pathologist); Peterson v. St. Cloud Hosp., 460 N.W.2d 635 (Minn. Ct. App. 1990) (concerning a pathologist); Phillips v. Good Samaritan Hosp., 416 N.E.2d 646 (Ohio 1979) (concerning a radiologist); Raptis-Smith, 755 N.Y.S.2d at 386 (concerning a radiologist); Walters, 520 N.E.2d at 468 (concerning a pathologist).Google Scholar
Grosse, S. D. and Khoury, M., “What is the Clinical Utility of Genetic Testing?” Genetics in Medicine 8, no. 7 (2006): 448–450, at 448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Id., at 448.Google Scholar
See Report of the Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society, supra note 41.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
See McGuire, , supra note 39, at 2669–2670; see also id.Google Scholar