Skip to main content
Log in

The care perspective and autonomy

  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article I wish to show how care ethics puts forward a fundamental critique on the ideal of independency in human life without thereby discounting autonomy as a moral value altogether. In care ethics, a relational account of autonomy is developed instead. Because care ethics is sometimes criticized in the literature as hopelessly vague and ambiguous, I shall begin by elaborating on how care ethics and its place in ethical theory can be understood. I shall stipulate a definition of care ethics as a moral perspective or orientation from which ethical theorizing can take place. This will mean that care ethics is more a stance from which we can theorize ethically, than ready-made theory in itself. In conceiving care ethics in this way, it becomes possible to make clear that, for instance, a moral concept of autonomy is not abandoned, but instead is given a particular place and interpretation. In the final part of this article I will show how ‘relational autonomy’ can be applied fruitfully in the practice of psychiatric care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baier, A.: 1995, Moral Prejudices. Cambridge MS: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, R.: 1992, 'Respect and Care: Toward Moral Integration', Canadian Journal of Philosophy 22, 105–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, G.: 1982, In a Different Voice. Cambridge MS: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govier, T.: 1992, 'Self-Trust, Autonomy and Self-Esteem', Hypatia 8 (1), 99–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, V.: 1993, Feminist Morality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, J.: 1997, 'Autonomy, Relationality and Feminist Ethics', Hypatia 12 (2), 152–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, M.:1998, 'Care: From Theory to Orientation and Back', Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (2), 190–209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, C. and N. Stoljar (eds.): 2000, Relational Autonomy. Feminist Perspectives on Autonomy, Agency and the Social Self. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, D.: 1987, Self, Society and Personal Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruddick, S.: 1989, Maternal Thinking. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, J.: 1993, Moral Boundaries. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veatch, R.: 1998, 'The Place of Care in Ethical Theory', Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (2), 210–224.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verkerk, M.: 1999, 'A Care Perspective on Coercion and Autonomy', Bioethics 13 (3/4), 358–369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, M.U.: 1998, Moral Understandings. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendell, S.: 1996, The Rejected Body. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verkerk, M.A. The care perspective and autonomy. Med Health Care Philos 4, 289–294 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012048907443

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012048907443

Navigation