Abstract
The topic of the article is how moral development theory can enlighten the understanding of ethical behaviour in business. It discusses previous research on the subject, and reports an empirical study of academics (engineers and business economists with a master degree) working in the private sector in Norway.
Moral development theory is based on a long research tradition, and many researchers within business ethics have assumed the importance of moral reasoning in business environments. However, the truth of these assumptions has not been confirmed by previous empirical research.
The article reports on my investigation into the relationship between moral reasoning, ethical attitudes and decision-making behaviour. The data were collected by a survey study among Norwegian engineers and business economists working in businesses (N = 449) in 1997.
It has been hypothesised that strong ethical attitudes would have a restraining effect on moral reasoning. In order to test this, ethical attitudes were categorized into four issue categories. The assumption being that the four categories would explain the different restraints on moral reasoning. The statistical testing showed that there was a negative, but not significant, correlation between strong attitudes and good moral reasoning ability.
It was also hypothesised that good ability in moral reasoning would tend to exhibit a smaller difference between Policy-decisions and Action-decisions. This hypothesis was based on the difference in behaviour explained in "espoused theory" and "theory in use". When making policy-decisions these can be based on espoused theory and nice "talk" because it is always possible to make exceptions to or reconsider a policy. Action-decisions, on the other hand, are very concrete because they immediately trigger an action. The statistical testing rejected my hypothesis but gave a significant converse result: Good ability in moral reasoning seems to imply less stability and more inconsistence.
The article concludes with the fact that moral reasoning testing seems to explain some differences in moral reasoning among people in business but not what kind of behavioural effects these differences actually have.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyris, C. and D. A. Schön: 1978, Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective (Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA).
Armstrong, M.: 1987, ‘Moral Development and Accounting Education’, Journal of Accounting Education (Spring), 27–43.
Bergling, K.: 1981, Moral Development: The Validity of Kohlberg's Theory (Almquist and Wicksell, Stockholm).
Brunsson, N.: 1989, The Organization of Hypocrisy (John Wiley & Sons, New York).
Castleberry, S. B., W. French and B. A. Carlin: 1993, ‘The Ethical Framework of Advertising and Marketing Research Practitioners: A Moral Development Perspective’, Journal of Advertising 22, 39–46.
Elm, D. R. and M. L. Nichols: 1993, ‘An Investigation of the Moral Reasoning of Managers’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 817–833.
Ferrell, O. C. and L. G. Gresham: 1985: ‘A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 49, 87–96.
Fraedrich, J., D. M. Thorne and O. C. Ferrell: 1992, ‘Cognitive Consistency of Marketing Managers in Ethical Situations’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing 20, 245–252.
Fraedrich, J., D. M. Thorne and O. C. Ferrell: 1994, ‘Assessing the Application of Cognitive Moral Development Theory to Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 829–838.
Gilligan, C.: 1994, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
Goolsby, J. R. and S. D. Hunt: 1992, ‘Cognitive Moral Development and Marketing’, Journal of Marketing 56, 55–68.
Gustafsson, C.: 1988, Om företag, moral och handling (Studentlitteratur, Stockholm).
Hunt, S. D. and S. Vitell: 1986, ‘A General Theory of Marketing Ethics’, Journal of Macromarketing 6, 5–16.
Jeffrey, C.: 1993, ‘Ethical Development of Accounting Students, Non-Accounting Business Students and Liberal Art Students’, Issues in Accounting Education 5, 195–208.
Kavathatzopoulos, I.: 1993, ‘Development of Cognitive Skills in Solving Business Ethics Problems: The Effects of Instruction’, Journal of Business Ethics 12, 379–386.
Kavathatzopoulos, I.: 1994, ‘Training Professional Mangers in Decision-Making about Real Life Business Ethics Problems: The Acquisition of the Autonomous Problem-solving Skill’, Journal of Business Ethics, 379–386.
Kohlberg, L.: 1976, ‘Moral Stage and Moralization: The Cognitive-Developmental Approach’, in T. Lickona (ed.), Moral Development and Behaviour (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York), pp. 31–53.
Kohlberg, L.: 1981, The Philosophy of Moral Development (Harper and Row, San Francisco).
Lampe, J. C. and D. W. Finn: 1992, ‘A Model of Auditor's Ethical Decision Processes’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 11, 33–59
Lawrence, J. A.: 1979, ‘Moral Judgment Intervention Studies Using the Defining Issue Test’, Journal of Moral Education 9, 14–24.
Marnburg, E.: 1998, Etikk i nœringslivet. En teoretisk og empirisk studie av individets, organisasjonens ogutdanningens betydning for atferd i etiske konfliktsituasjoner (Tano-Aschehoug, Oslo).
Platon: 1992, ‘Protagoras. Menon. Hippias minor’, in Platons skrifter, vol. 2–3 (Reitzel, Copenhagen).
Ponemon, L. A.: 1992, ‘Ethical Reasoning and Selection-Socialization in Accounting’, Accounting, Organizations and Society 17, 239–258.
Ponemon, L. A.: 1990, ‘Ethical Jugdement in Accounting: A Cognitive Development Perspective’, Critical Perspectives in Accounting 1, 191–215.
Rawls, J.: 1971, Theory of Justice (The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).
Rest, J. R.: 1979, Development in Judging Moral Issues (University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN).
Rest, J. R.: 1984, ‘The Major Components of Morality’, in W. M. Kurtines and J. L. Gewirtz (eds.), Morality, Moral Behaviour, and Moral Development (John Wiley, New York), pp. 24–40.
Rest, J. R.: 1986, Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory (Praeger, New York).
Rest, J. R.: 1990, DIT Manual, 3. ed., 8–90 rev. (Center for the Study of Ethical Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN).
Robin, D. P., G. Gordon, C. Jordan and R. E. Reidenbach: 1996, ‘The Empirical Performance of Cognitive Moral Development Predicting Behavioral Intent’, Business Ethics Quarterly 6, 493–515.
Shaub, M. K.: 1994, ‘An Analysis of the Association of the Traditional Demographic Variables with the Moral Reasoning of Auditing Students and Auditors’, Journal of Accounting Education 12, 1–26.
Snell, R.: 1995, ‘Does Lower-Stage Ethical Reasoning Emerge in More Familiar Contexts?’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 959–976.
Thoma, S. J. and J. R. Rest, with R. Barnett: 1986, ‘Moral Judgment, Behaviour, Decision Making, and Attitude’, in J. R. Rest (ed.), Moral Development: Advances in Research an Theory (Praeger, New York), pp. 133–175.
Trevino: 1986, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person Situation Interactionist Model’, Academy of Management Review 11, 601–617.
Trevino, L. K. and S. A. Youngblood: 1990, ‘Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Casual Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior’, Journal of Applied Psychology 75, 378–375
Weber, J.: 1990, ‘Managers’ Moral Reasoning: Assessing Their Responses to Three Moral Dilemmas', Human Relations 43, 687–702.
Wimalasiri, J. S., F. Pavri and A. A. K. Jalil: 1996, ‘An Empirical Study of Moral Reasoning Among Managers in Singapore’, Journal of Business Ethics 15, 1331–1341.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marnburg, E. The Questionable Use of Moral Development Theory in Studies of Business Ethics: Discussion and Empirical Findings. Journal of Business Ethics 32, 275–283 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010643309056
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010643309056