Skip to main content
Log in

The “vanishing” of the disjunction effect by sensible procrastination

  • Symposium Article
  • Published:
Mind & Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The disjunction effect (Tversky and Shafir in Psychol Sci 3:305–309, 1992) occurs when decision makers prefer option x (versus y) when knowing that event A occurs and also when knowing that event A does not occur, but they refuse x (or prefer y) when not knowing whether or not A occurs. This form of incoherence violates Savage’s (Cognition 57:31–95, 1954) sure-thing principle, one of the basic axioms of the rational theory of decision-making. The phenomenon was attributed to a lack of clear reasons for accepting an option (x) when the subjects are under uncertainty. Through a pragmatic analysis of the task and a consequent reformulation of it, we show that the effect does not depend on the presence of uncertainty, but on the introduction into the text-problem of a non-relevant goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For obvious geographical reasons, Hawaii (which cannot be a reasonable destination for a 5-day holiday from Europe) have been changed with "a nice destination".

  2. We used the Italian word "caparra" (deposit) which indicates a percentage (usually around 20%) of the total amount of money that has to be paid for the holiday. In this sense, it is surely more onerous than a fee.

References

  • Bagassi M, Macchi L (2006a) Pragmatic approach to decision making under uncertainty: the case of the disjunction effect. Thinking Reasoning 12(3):329–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagassi M, Macchi L (2006b) On the pragmatic role of useless information in the disjunction effect. Organ Behav Hum Dec (under review)

  • Bastardi A, Shafir E (1998) On the pursuit and misuse of useless information. J Pers Soc Psychol 75(1):19-32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastardi A, Shafir E (2000) Non-consequential reasoning and its consequences. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 9:216–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croson R (1999) The disjunction effect and reason-based choice in games. Organ Behav Hum Dec 80(2):118-133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulany DE, Hilton DJ (1991) Conversational implicature, conscious representation, and the conjunction fallacy. Soc Cognition 9(1):85-110

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühberger A, Komunska D, Perner J (2001) The disjunction effect: does it exist for two-step gambles? Organ Behav Hum Dec 85(2):250-264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macchi L (2000) Partitive formulation of information in probabilistic problems: beyond heuristics and frequency format explanations. Organ Behav Hum Dec 82(2):217-236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosconi G (1990) Discorso e pensiero. Il Mulino, Bologna

  • Mosconi G, Macchi L (2001) The role of pragmatic rules in the conjunction fallacy. Mind Soc 2(1):31-58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Politzer G, Macchi L (2000) Reasoning and pragmatics. Mind Soc 1:73-93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage LJ (1954) The foundations of statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafir E (1994) Uncertainty and the difficulty of thinking through disjunctions. Cognition 50:403-430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafir E, Tversky A (1992) Thinking through uncertainty: non-consequential reasoning and choice. Cognitive Psychol 24:449-474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shafir E, Simonson I, Tversky A (1993) Reason-based choice. Cognition 49:11-36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D, Cara F, Girotto V (1995) Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition 57:31-95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber D, Wilson D (1986) Relevance: communication and cognition. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Shafir E (1992) The disjunction effect in choice under uncertainty. Psychol Sci 3:305-309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Henst JB, Sperber D, Politzer G (2002) When is a conclusion worth deriving? Thinking Reasoning 8:1-20

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Giuseppe Mosconi and Peter Ayton for their comments on a previous draft of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Macchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bagassi, M., Macchi, L. The “vanishing” of the disjunction effect by sensible procrastination. Mind & Society 6, 41–52 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-006-0024-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-006-0024-0

Keywords

Navigation