Skip to main content
Log in

What the Liar Taught Achilles

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Zeno's paradoxes of motion and the semantic paradoxes of the Liar have long been thought to have metaphorical affinities. There are, in fact, isomorphisms between variations of Zeno's paradoxes and variations of the Liar paradox in infinite-valued logic. Representing these paradoxes in dynamical systems theory reveals fractal images and provides other geometric ways of visualizing and conceptualizing the paradoxes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barnsley, M. (1988), Fractals Everywhere, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barwise, J. and Etchemendy, J. (1987), The Liar, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burge, T. (1982), The Liar paradox: Tangles and chains, Philosophical Studies 41, 353–366. Reprinted in Martin (1984), 83–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, L. (Charles Dodgson) (1895), What the Tortoise said to Achilles, Mind, N. S. 4, 278–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Church, A. (1956), Introduction to Mathematical Logic, Vol. 1, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. H. (1976), On Numbers and Games, Academic Press, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, H. B. (1941), The paradox of Kleene and Rosser, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 50, 454–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devaney, R. L. (1989), An Introduction to Chaotic Dynamical Systems, 2nd edition, Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. (1972), Inference and Self-Reference, in: Davidson and Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 695–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, M. (1972), The binary Gray code, Scientific American 277 (August), 106 ff.

  • Gupta, A. (1982), Truth and paradox, J. Phil. Logic 11, 1–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberger, H. (1982), Notes on naive semantics, J. Phil. Logic 11, 61–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleene, S. C. (1936), λ-definability and recursiveness, Duke Math. J. 2, 340–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleene, S. C. and Barkley, J. R. (1935), The inconsistency of certain formal logics, Ann. Math. 36, 630–636.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuth, D. E. (1974), Surreal Numbers, Addison-Wesley, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mar, G. and Grim, P. (1991), Pattern and chaos: new images in the semantics of paradox, Noûs 25, 659–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. L. (1984), Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, R. (1976), Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics, Nature 261, 459–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peitgen, H.-O. and Saupe, D. (eds.) (1988), The Science of Fractal Images, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, N. (1969), Multi-valued Logic, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. (1970), Zeno's Paradoxes, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, M. (1991), Fractals, Chaos, Power Laws, W. H. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K. (1966), John Buridan: Sophisms on Meaning and Truth, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, P. (1995), Infinity plus one, and the surreal numbers, Discover 16, 96–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skryms, B. (1982), Intensional aspects of semantical self-reference, in: Martin (1984), pp. 119–131.

  • St. Denis, P. and Grim, P. (1997), Fractal images of formal systems, J. Phil. Logic 26, 181–222.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mar, G., Denis, P.S. What the Liar Taught Achilles. Journal of Philosophical Logic 28, 29–46 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004399631475

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004399631475

Navigation