Abstract
Heraclitus is generally recognised as the first of the Greek thinkers to develop a psychology, but the understanding of his psychology is held back by the assumptions that his soul is a life-principle and is ‘comprehensive’ of the various faculties we regard as psychological. The fragment that best displays the revolutionary character of Heraclitus’ soul doctrine, from a properly psychological viewpoint, is B 85. I offer an extended analysis of this fragment in order to bear out the claims, firstly, that psyche or ‘soul’ for Heraclitus is the intelligence alone, divine in origin, and secondly that thumos (primarily as the seat of desire) is a better candidate for his biological life-principle, whose exigencies are at odds with those of soul. I also offer some reflections on why, despite Heraclitus’ multifaceted influence on fifth-century thought, and despite the coherence of his psychology, this ‘revolution’ never quite took hold.
Alt, K. 1973. “Zum Satz vom Anaximenes über die Seele. Untersuchung von Aetios ΠΕΡΙ ΑΡΧΟΝ”. Hermes 101, 129–164.Search in Google Scholar
Betegh, G. 2013. “On the Physical Aspect of Heraclitus’ Psychology”. In Doctrine and Doxography: Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras. Eds. D. Sider/D. Obbink. Berlin/Boston, 225–261. Repr. with new appendices from Phronesis 5, 3–32.10.1515/9783110331370.225Search in Google Scholar
Bollack, J./Wismann, H. 1972. Héraclite ou la séparation. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Burkert, W. 1972. Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Trans. E. L. Minar, Jr. Cambridge, MA.Search in Google Scholar
Claus, D. B. 1981. Toward the Soul: An Inquiry into the Meaning of ψυχή before Plato. New Haven.Search in Google Scholar
Conche, M. 1986. Héraclite: Fragments. Paris.Search in Google Scholar
Darcus Sullivan, S. 1995. Psychological and Ethical Ideas: What Early Greeks Say. Leiden.10.1163/9789004329492Search in Google Scholar
English, R. B. 1913. “Heraclitus and the Soul”. Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 44, 163–184.10.2307/282551Search in Google Scholar
Finkelberg, A. 2013. “Heraclitus, the Rival of Pythagoras”. In Doctrine and Doxography, 147–162.10.1515/9783110331370.147Search in Google Scholar
–. 2017. Heraclitus and Thales’ Conceptual Scheme. A Historical Study. Leiden.10.1163/9789004338210Search in Google Scholar
Gould, J. B. 1970. The Philosophy of Chrysippus. Albany.10.1163/9789004320369Search in Google Scholar
Huffman, C. A. 1993. Philolaus of Croton: Pythagorean and Presocratic. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511597367Search in Google Scholar
–. 2009. “The Pythagorean Conception of the Soul from Pythagoras to Philolaus”. In Body and Soul in Ancient Philosophy. Eds. D. Frede/B. Reis. Berlin/New York, 21–44.10.1515/9783110216523.1.21Search in Google Scholar
Hussey, E. 1982. “Epistemology and Meaning in Heraclitus”. In Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Eds. M. Schofield/M. Nussbaum, Cambridge, 33–60.10.1017/CBO9780511550874.004Search in Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. 1979. The Art and Thought of Heraclitus. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. 1954. Heraclitus. The Cosmic Fragments. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
–. /Raven, J. E/Schofield, M. 1957. The Presocratic Philosophers. Cambridge.10.1017/CBO9780511813375Search in Google Scholar
Kouremenos, T./Parássoglou, G. M./Tsantsanoglou, K. (eds.) 2006. The Derveni Papyrus. Florence.Search in Google Scholar
Luria, S. 2007. Democrito. Raccolta dei Frammenti, Interpretazione e Commentario. Trans. A. Krivushina. Milan.Search in Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. 1992. “Heraclitus Fr. B 85 DK”. Mnemosyne 45, 9–18.10.1163/1568525X-90000002Search in Google Scholar
–. 2015. “Heraclitus on Soul and Super-Soul with an Afterthought on the Afterlife”. Rhizomata 3, 62–93.10.1515/rhiz-2015-0005Search in Google Scholar
Marcovich, M. 1967. Heraclitus. The Greek Text with a Short Commentary. Merida.Search in Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 1972. “ψυχή in Heraclitus”. Phronesis 17, 1–16, 157–70.Search in Google Scholar
Powell, J. E. 1938. A Lexicon to Herodotus. Cambridge.Search in Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. 1916. Parmenides und die Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie. Bonn.Search in Google Scholar
Robinson, T. M. 1987. Heraclitus. Fragments. Toronto/Buffalo/London.Search in Google Scholar
Schofield, M. 1991. “Heraclitus’ Theory of Soul and its Antecedents”. In Companions to Ancient Thought, vol. 2, Psychology. Ed. S. Everson. Cambridge, 13–34.Search in Google Scholar
Snell, B. 1953. The Discovery of the Mind. Trans. T. G. Rosenmeyer, Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Špaňár, J. 1969. “Die Seelenlehre des Herakleitos von Ephesos”. Sborník prací Filozofické fakulty brněnské univerzity 18, 45–56.Search in Google Scholar
Vassallo, C. 2013. “Il fr. 70 Marcovich di Eraclito (= DK 22 B 85) nel De ira di Filodemo. Praesocratica Herculanensia III”. Cronache ercolanesi 43, 73–93.Search in Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. 1943. “A Psychological Statement of Heraclitus”. Mnemosyne 11, 115–121.Search in Google Scholar
Vlastos, G. 1955. “On Heraclitus”. American Journal of Philology 76, 337–68.10.2307/j.ctv24rgc1n.13Search in Google Scholar
West, M. L. 1971. Early Greek Philosophy and the Orient. Oxford.Search in Google Scholar
Wheelwright, P. 1959. Heraclitus. Princeton, NJ.Search in Google Scholar
Wilamowitz-Moellendorff, U. von. 1931. Der Glaube der Hellenen. 2 vols. Berlin.10.1515/9783112535608Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
