Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Corporate Social Responsibility

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the context of some criticism about social responsibility education in business schools, the paper reports findings from a survey of CSR education (teaching and research) in Europe. It analyses the extent of CSR education, the different ways in which it is defined and the levels at which it is taught. The paper provides an account of the efforts that are being made to ‘‘mainstream’’ CSR teaching and of the teaching methods deployed. It considers drivers of CSR courses, particularly the historical role of motivated individuals and the anticipation of future success being dependent on more institutional drivers. Finally it considers main developments in CSR research both by business school faculty and PhD students, tomorrow’s researchers and the resources devoted to CSR research. The conclusion includes questions that arise and further research directions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • P. S. Adler (2002) ArticleTitle‘Corporate Scandals: It’s Time for Reflection in Business Schools’ Academy of Management Executive 16 IssueID3 148–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspen/WRI. 2003, Beyond Grey Pinstripes 2003. Preparing MBAs for Social and Environmental Stewardship [accessed on 5 March 2004], The Aspen Institute and the World Resource Institute, www.BeyondGreyPinstripes.org

  • A. B. Carroll (1999) ArticleTitle‘Corporate social responsibility – Evolution of a Definitional Construct’ Business and Society 38(3) 268–295

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Caulkin (2004) ‘Business Schools for Scandal’, The Observer March 28 ) 9 (Business Section

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Collins S. L. Wartick (1995) ArticleTitle‘Business and Society/Business Ethics Courses’ Business and Society 34(1) 51–89

    Google Scholar 

  • C. J. Cowton J. Cummins (2003) ArticleTitle‘Teaching Business Ethics in UK Higher Education: Progress and Prospects’ Teaching Business Ethics 7 37–54

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Crane D. Matten (2004) Business Ethics - A European Perspective. Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Cummins (1999) The Teaching of Business Ethics at Undergraduate, Postgraduate and Professional Levels in the UK Institute of Business Ethics London

    Google Scholar 

  • EBNSC/Copenhagen Centre, 1998, ‘‘Business in Society’’ in European Universities and Business Schools, European Business Network for Social Cohesion, The Copenhagen Centre, Brussels, Copenhagen

  • G. Enderle (1990) ArticleTitle‘A Worldwide Survey of Business Ethics in the 1990s’ Journal of Business Ethics 16 1475–1483

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Fernandez Young J. Moon R. Young (2003) The UK Corporate Social Responsibility Consultancy Industry: A Phenomenological Approach Research Paper Series ICCSR No 14-2003 Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  • D. A. Gioia (2002) ArticleTitle‘Business Education’s Role in the Crisis of Confidence in Corporations’ Academy of Management Executive 16(3) 142–144

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Goshal (2003) ‘Business schools share the blame for Enron’ Financial Times (July 18)

    Google Scholar 

  • L. T. Hosmer (1985) ArticleTitle‘The other 338: Why a Majority of Our Schools of Business Administration do Not Offer a Course in Business Ethics’ Journal of Business Ethics 4 17–22

    Google Scholar 

  • L. T. Hosmer (1999) ArticleTitle‘Somebody Out There Doesn’t Like us: A Study of the Position and Respect of Business Ethics at Schools of Business Administration’ Journal of Business Ethics 22 91–106

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Mahoney (1990) Teaching Business Ethics in the UK, Europe, and the USA : A Comparative Study Athlone Press London; Atlantic Highlands, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Moon D. Matten (2004) Corporate Social Responsibility Education – How and why Europe is different (Research Paper Series ICCSR Nottingham) forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Morris (2001) ArticleTitle‘Business Ethics Assessment Criteria: Business v. Philosophy – Survey Results’ Business Ethics Quarterly 11(4) 623–650

    Google Scholar 

  • J. R. Shannon R. L. Berl (1997) ArticleTitle‘Are we teaching ethics in marketing? A survey of students’ attitudes and perceptions’ Journal of Business Ethics 16 1059–1075

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, C. S.: 2004, ‘A question of Ethics: How to Teach Them?’ The New York Times (March 21).

  • H.J. L. van Luijk (2001) ‘Business ethics in Europe: A Tale of Two Efforts’, in R Frederick (ed.) A Companion to Business Ethics (Blackwell, Cambrigde/MA, Oxford), pp. 643–658

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Wheeler D. Horvath P. Victor (2001) ‘Graduate Learning for Business and Sustainability’ Journal of Business Administration and Policy Analysis 27–29 167 – 187

    Google Scholar 

  • Willen, L.: 2004, ‘Kellogg Denies Guilt as B Schools Evade Alumni Lapses’, www.bloomberg.com [accessed on 8 March 2004].

  • M. Wolf (2002) ArticleTitle‘‘Response to Confronting the Critics’‘ New Academy Review 1(1) 230–237

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Zsolnai (1998) The European difference. Business Ethics in the Community of European Business Schools Kluwer Boston, Dordrecht, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Matten.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matten, D., Moon, J. Corporate Social Responsibility. J Bus Ethics 54, 323–337 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1822-0

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1822-0

Keywords

Navigation