Skip to main content
Log in

Network Governance as a Response to Risk Society Dilemmas: A Proposal from the Sociology of Health

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

After a short description of the major sociological theories based on the concept of risk (Douglas, Beck, Luhmann, Giddens) I propose to integrate the concept of risk with the concept of trust. On a less theoretical level I propose to consider governance as the institutional response to the growing complexity of the risk society. Above all, network governance – that is institutional steering based on a high community participation – seems to give good results in the field of health care policies, as has been shown in the Emilia-Romagna area (Italy).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abelson, J., Forest, P., Eyles, J., Smith, P., Martin, E., and Gauvin, F.: 2003,‘Deliberation about Deliberative Methods:Issues in the Design and Evaluation of Public Participation Processes’, Social Science & Medicine 57, 239–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, L., a cura di: 2002, ‘Ascolto e partecipazione dei cittadini in sanit’, Salute e Societ' 1(2).

  • Bateson, G.:1979, Mind and Nature.A Necessary Unit, New York: Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U.: 1992, Risk Society:Toward a New Modernity, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheek, J.: 2003,‘Negotiated Social Space: A Relook at Partnership in Contemporary Health Care’, Primary Health Care Research and Development 3, 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cipolla, C., Giarelli G.,a cura di: 2002, ‘Dopo l'aziendalizzazione. Nuove strategie di governance in sanit’, Salute e Societ', 1(1).

  • Cipolla, C.: 1997, Epistemologia della tolleranza, Milano: Angeli, 5 vols.

  • Courpasson, D.: 2000, ‘Managerial Strategies of Domination: Power in Soft Burocracies’, Organization Studies 21, 141–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culbertson, H.M., and Stempel, G.H.: 1985, ‘Media Malaise: Explaining Personal Optimism and Social Pessimism about Health Care’, Journal of Mass Communication 35, 180–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M.: 1992, Risk and Blame, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishcoff, B.: 1995,‘Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged: Twenty Years of Process’, Risk Analysis 15, 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, J.: 2002,‘Deliberative Democracy’,in R. L. Simon (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Social and Political Philosophy, Malden Mass, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, J., and Luskin, R. C.:1999,‘Bringing Deliberation to the Democratic Dialogue’,in M. McCombs and A. Reynolds (eds.), The Poll with the Human Face:The National Issues Convention Experiments in Political Communication, Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H.: 1967, Studies in Ethnomethodology, N.J.: Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A.: 1990, The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A.: 1999, Runaway World. How Globalization is Reshaping our Lives, London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E.: 1959, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life, New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D.: 1991, Democracy and the Global Order:From the Modern State to Cosmopolitan Governance, Cambridge: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, P.: 2000, ‘Democracy and Governance’, in J. Pierre (ed.), Debating Governance. Authority, Steering, and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, E.and Lazarsfeld, P.F.: 1957,‘The Two-Step Flow of Communication:An Up-To-Date Report and Hypothesis’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 21, 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J.: 1993, ‘Social-Political Governance: Introduction’, in J. Kooiman (ed.), Modern Governance, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S.: 1994, ‘Reflexivity and its Double: Structures, Aesthetics, Community’, in U. Beck et al.(eds.), Reflexive Modernization: Politics; Tradition and Aestetics in the Modern Social Order, Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N.: 1968, Vertrauen. Ein Mechanismus Der reduction Sozialer Komplexität, Stuttgart: Enke.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N.: 1991, Soziologie des Risikos, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturo, A.: 2002, ‘Dalla qualit' percepita all 'interpretazione del vissuto ospedaliero’, in C. Cipolla et al. (eds.), Valutare la qualit'in sanit', Milano: Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick, S., Polk, R., Brown, P., and Brody, J.: forthcoming, ‘Public Involvement in Breast Cancer Research: An Analysis and Prototype’, International Journal of Health Services.

  • Park, E., Scherer, C.W., and Glynn, C.J.: 2001, ‘Community Involvement and Risk Perception at Personal and Societal Levels’, Health; Risk & Society 3, 281–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J.: 2000, Introduction, in J. Pierre (ed.), Debating Governance. Authority; Steering; and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plaut, T., Landis, S., and Trevor, J.:1992, ‘Enhancing Participatory Research with the Community Oriented Primary Care Model:A Case Study in Community Mobilization’, The American Sociologist, winter, 56–70.

  • Prandini R.: 1998, Le radici fiduciarie del legame sociale, Milano: Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R.A.W.: 1997, Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity, and Accountability, Buckingam: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E.M.: 1983, Diffusion of Innovations, New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, J. and Czempiel, E.O.: 1992, Governance without Government, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stzompka, P. 1995, 'Die fehlende Ressource in der postkommunistischen Gesellschaft, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsycologie 35, 254–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tansey, J., and O'Riordan, T.: 1999, ‘Cultural Theory and Risk: A Review’, Health, Risk and Society 1, 71–90.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maturo, A. Network Governance as a Response to Risk Society Dilemmas: A Proposal from the Sociology of Health. Topoi 23, 195–202 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TOPO.0000046066.21486.82

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:TOPO.0000046066.21486.82

Keywords

Navigation