Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-29T14:06:59.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Our Knowledge of Colour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Get access

Extract

Scientists are often bemused by the efforts of philosophers essaying a theory of colour: colour science sports a huge array of facts and theories, and it is unclear to its practitioners what philosophy can or is trying to contribute. Equally, philosophers tend to be puzzled about how they can fit colour science into their investigations without compromising their own disciplinary identity: philosophy is supposed to be an a priori investigation; philosophers do not work in psychophysics labs – not in their professional capacity, anyway.

These inter-disciplinary barriers arise out of misunderstanding. Philosophers should not so much attempt to contribute to empirical theories of colour, as to formulate philosophical theories of colour. Philosophy is concerned with appearance and reality, object and property, function and representation, and other such fundamental categories of ontology and epistemology. Philosophical theories attempt to fit colour into these categories; such theories do not compete with colour science. However, fitting colour into philosophical theories means dealing with colour as it really is – and one cannot know what it is without consulting the psychologists. That is why philosophers need an up-to-date understanding of psychological theories of colour.

Type
III. Vision
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Paul A., Boghossian and Velleman, J. David 1989. “Colour as a Secondary Quality,” Mind (New Series) 98, 81103.Google Scholar
Paul A., Boghossian and Velleman, J. David 1991. “Physicalist Theories of Color,” Philosophical Review 100, 67106.Google Scholar
Bradley, Peter A. and Tye, Michael 2001. “Of Colors, Kestrels, Caterpillars, and Leaves,” Journal of Philosophy 98, 469–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonathan, Cohen 2000. “Color Properties and Color Perception: A Functionalist Account,” Rutgers University PhD thesis.Google Scholar
Fred, Dretske 1995. Naturalizing the Mind, The Jean Nicod Lectures, 1995. Cambridge, MA: MIT, Bradford Books.Google Scholar
Hardin, C.L. 1988. Color for Philosophers: Unweaving the Rainbow Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Harvey, Jean 2000. “Colour-Dispositionalism and its Recent Critics,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61, 137–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leo M., Hurwich 1981. Color Vision. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Leo M., Hurwich and Jameson, Dorothea 1956. “Some Quantitative Aspects of an Opponent-Colors Theory. IV. A Psychological Color Specification Scheme,” Journal of the Optical Society of America 46, 416–21.Google Scholar
Jackson, Frank and Pargetter, Robert A. 1987. “An Objectivist's Guide to Subjectivism about Colour,” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 41, 127–41.Google Scholar
Johnston, Mark 1992. “How to Speak of the Colors,” Philosophical Studies 68, 221–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mark, Johnston 1997. 1992 reprinted with a Postscript in Readings on Color, vol. 1, The Philosophy of Color, Byrne, A. and Hilbert, D. R. eds. Cambridge, MA, pp. 137–76.Google Scholar
Long, A.A. and Sedley, D. N. 1987. The Hellenistic Philosophers, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mohan, Matthen 1999. “The Disunity of Color,” Philosophical Review 105, 4774.Google Scholar
Brian, McLaughlin Forthcoming. “The Place of Color in Nature,” New Essays on Consciousness Smith, Quentin ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher 1984. “Colour Concepts and Colour Experience,” Synthese 58, 365–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Regan, B.C.Julliot, C.Simmen, B.Vienot, F.Charles-Dominique, P. and Mollon, J. D. 2001. “Fruits, Foliage and the Evolution of Primate Colour Vision,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 356, 229–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alfred, Tarski 1944. “The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4, 341–76.Google Scholar