Skip to main content
Log in

Two Theories of Supposition?

  • Published:
Topoi Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a recent paper Paul Vincent Spade suggests that, although the medieval doctrine of the modes of personal supposition originally had something to do with the rest of the theory of supposition, it became, by the 14th century, an unrelated theory with no question to answer. By contrast, I argue that the theory of the modes of personal supposition was meant to provide a way of making understandable the idea that a general term in a categorical proposition can be used to refer to the individual things that fall under it. Once that idea had been made acceptable, truth conditons for the various forms of categorical proposition could be given without any specific appeal to the ideas of descent and ascent in terms of which the modes had been defined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matthews, G.B. Two Theories of Supposition?. Topoi 16, 35–40 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005763718863

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005763718863

Keywords

Navigation