Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Answers to these comments

  • Published:
Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References to discussion

  • Arnold, A. J. and K. Fristrup: 1982, ‘The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection: A Hierarchical Expansion’, Paleobiology 8, 113–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atran, S.: 1985, ‘The Nature of Folk-Botanical Life Forms’, American Anthropologist 87, 298–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, K. E. von: 1828, Entwickelungsgeschichte der Thiere, Königsberg.

  • Beatty, J.: 1982, ‘Classes and Cladists’, Systematic Zoology 31, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, B., D. E. Breedlove, and P. H. Raven: 1973, ‘General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology’, American Anthropologist 75, 214–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanfly, L.: 1968, General Systems Theory, Foundations, Development, Applications, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C. H.: 1985, ‘Mode of Subsistence and Folk Biological Taxonomy’, Current Anthropology 26, 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunswick, E.: 1952, The Conceptual Framework of Psychology, Chicago University Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffon, G. L.: [1753], 1954, in J. Piveteau (ed.), Oeuvres Philosophiques, Presses Universaires de France, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, M.: 1981, ‘Biopopulations, Not Biospecies, Are Individuals and Evolve’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, A. J.: 1954, Animal Species and Their Evolution, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, W. H. and C. L. Gilly: 1943, ‘The Structure and Origin of Species’, Brittonia 4, 323–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A. L.: 1980, ‘Have Species Become Declassé?’, PSA 1980 1, 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caplan, A. L.: 1981, ‘Back to Class: A Note on the Ontology of Species’, Philosophy of Science 48, 130–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, J., D. D. Keck and W. M. Hiesey: 1940, Experimental Studies on the Nature of Species. I. The Effect of Varied Environments on Western North American Plants. Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ., Number 520.

  • Cracraft, J.: 1983, ‘Species Concepts and Speciation Analysis’, Current Ornithology 1, 159–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A.: 1978, ‘Once Again, What is a Species? Biosystematics in Agriculture’, Beltsville Symposia in Agricultural Research, No. 2, Wiley, New York, pp. 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C.: 1859, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. John Murray, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, F. (ed.): 1899, The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, D. Appleton and Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T.: 1935, ‘A Critique of the Species Concept in Biology’, Philosophy of Science 2, 344–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T.: 1951, ‘Mendelian Populations and Their Evolution’ in L. C. Dunn (ed.), Genetics in the 20th Century, Macmillan, New York, pp. 573–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T.: 1970, Genetics of the Evolutionary Process, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupuis, C.: 1984, ‘Willi Hennig's Impact on Systematics’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N.: 1986, Unfinished Synthesis, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. & J. Cracraft: 1980, Phylogenetic Patterns and the Evolutionary Process: Method and Theory in Comparative Biology, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, W. L.: 1981, ‘Individuality and Comparative Biology’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J.: 1984, ‘Observation Reconsidered’, Philosophy of Science 15, 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T.: 1966, ‘On Psychologism in the Logic of Taxonomic Controversies’, Systematic Zoology 15, 207–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T.: 1969a, The Triumph of the Darwinian Method, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T.: 1969b, ‘Non-phenetic Evidence in Phylogeny’ Systematic Zoology 18, 460–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T.: 1970, ‘Models in Phylogeny’, in T. J. M. Schopf, (ed.), Models in Paleobiology, Freeman and Cooper, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T.: 1974a, ‘A Radical Solution to the Species Problem’, Systematic Zoology 23, 536–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T.: 1974b, The Economy of Nature and the Evolution of Sex, University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T.: 1981, ‘Categories, Life, and Thinking’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 269–313. [With Commentary.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselin, M. T.: 1984. ‘“Definition”, “Character”, and Other Equivocal Terms’, Systematic Zoology 33, 104–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosliner, T. M. and M. T Ghiselin: 1984, ‘Parallel Evolution in Opisthobranch Gastropods and its Implications for Phylogenetic Methodology’, Systematic Zoology 33, 255–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, V.: 1957, ‘The Plant Species in Theory and Practice’ in E. Mayr (ed.), The Species Problems, AAAS Publication 50, Washington, D. C.

  • Gregg, J. R.: 1950, ‘Taxonomy, Language, and Reality’, American Naturalist 84, 421–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, J. R.: 1954, The Language of Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haeckel, E.: 1866, Generelle Morphologie der Organismen, 2 Vols., Georg Reimer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heise, H.: 1981, ‘Universals, Particulars, and Paradigms’, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 289–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W.: 1950, Grundzüge einer Theorie der Phylogenetischen Systematik, Deutscher Zentralverlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W.: 1966, Phylogenetic Systematics, University of Illinois Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holsinger, K. E.: 1984, ‘The Nature of Biological Species’, Philosophy of Science 51, 293–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1967, ‘Metaphysics of Evolution’, British Journal of the History of Science 3, 309–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1974, Philosophy of Biological Science, Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1976, ‘Are Species Really Individuals?’, Systematic Zoology 25, 1974–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1978, ‘A Matter of Individuality’, Philosophy of Science 45, 335–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1980, ‘Individuality and Selection’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11, 311–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1981, ‘Metaphysics and Common Usage’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 290–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1984, ‘Can Kripke Alone Save Essentialism? A Reply to Kitts’, Systematic Zoology 33, 110–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevons, W. S.: 1877, Principles of Science, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, K.: 1905, Der Gegensatz Zwischen Geographischer und Nichtgeographischer Variation, Z. Wiss. Zool. 83, 151–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, K. G.: 1921, (translation, 1971), Psychological Types, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1982, Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1983, The Nature of Mathematical Knowledge, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1984a, ‘Species’, Philosophy of Science 51, 308–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1984b, ‘Against the Monism of the Moment: A Reply to Elliott Sober’, Philosophy of Science 51, 616–630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1986a, ‘Bewitchment of the Biologist’, Nature 320, 649–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P.: 1986b, ‘The Species’ (MS.).

  • Kitts, D. B.: 1983, ‘Can Baptism Alone Save a Species?’ Systematic Zoology 32, 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitts, D. B.: 1984, ‘The Names of Species: A Reply to Hull’, Systematic Zoology 33, 112–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitts, D. B. and D. J. Kitts: 1979, ‘Biological Species as Natural Kinds’, Philosophy of Science 46, 613–622.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, S.: 1980, Naming and Necessity, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.: 1983, ‘The Organism as the Subject and Object of Evolution’, Scientia 118, 63–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1942, Systematics and the Origin of Species, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1954, ‘Change of Genetic Environment and Evolution’, in J. Huxley, A. C. Hardy and E. B. Ford (eds.), Evolution as a Process, Allen and Unwin, London, 157–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1957, ‘Species Concepts and Definitions’, in E. Mayr (ed.), The Species Problem, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, D.C., 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1963, Animal Species and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1970, Populations, Species, and Evolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1974, ‘Teleological and Teleonomic: A New Analysis’, in Cohen, R. S., and M. W. Wartofsky (eds.), Methodological and Historical Essays in the Natural and Social Sciences, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 14, Reidel, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1976a, Evolution and the Diversity of Life, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1976b, Is the Species a Class or an Individual?, Systematic Zoology 25, 192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1982, The Growth of Biological Thought, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1983, ‘Comments on David Hull's Paper on Exemplars and Type-specimens’, PSA 1982 2, 504–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1985, ‘Darwin's Five Theories of Evolution’, in David Kohn (ed.), The Darwinian Heritage, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 755–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1986a, (Review of E. Sober), Paleobiology 12, 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E.: 1986b, The Species as Category, Taxon, Population. Singer-Polignac Symposium, Paris, 294–311.

  • Miller, J. G.: 1978, Living Systems, McGraw Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishler, B. D. and M. J. Donoghue: 1982, ‘Species Concepts: A Case for Pluralism’, Systematic Zoology, 31, 491–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G. and N. Platnick: 1981, Systematics and Biogeography, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, H. E. H.: 1980, ‘A Comment on “Mate Recognition Systems”’, Evolution 34, 330–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paterson, H. E. H.: 1985, ‘The Recognition Concept of Species’, Species and Speciation, E. S. Vrba (ed.), Transvaal Museum Monograph No. 4, Transvaal Museum, Pretoria, 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plate, L.: 1914, ‘Prinzipien der Systematik mit besonderer Berücksichtigung des Systems der Tiere’, Die Kultur der Gegenwart, III (IV,4), 92–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulton, E. B.: 1903, ‘What is a Species?’, Proceedings of the Entomological Society of London, LXXVI–CXVI.

  • Quine, W. V.: 1969, ‘Natural Kinds’, in Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raubenheimer, D. & T. M. Crowe: In press, ‘The Concept of Speciation by Recognition; Is It Really an Alternative?’ South African Journal of Science.

  • Ridley, M.: 1985, Evolution and Classification: The Reformation of Cladism, Longman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, D.: 1979, ‘Fishes from the Upland Intermontane Basins of Guatemala: Revisionary Studies and Comparative Geography’, Bulletin American Museum of Natural History 162, 269–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, A.: 1985, The Structure of Biological Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M.: 1973, The Philosophy of Biology, Hutchinson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthe, S. N.: 1981, ‘The World Represented as a Hierarchy of Nature May Not Require “Species”’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 300–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. P. (ed.): 1977, Naming, Necessity, and Natural Kinds, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. P.: 1981, ‘Natural Kinds’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 301–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaposhnikov, G. Ch.: 1984, ‘Aphids and a Step toward the Universal Species Concept’, Evolutionary Theory 7, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. G.: 1961, Principles of Animal Taxonomy, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, P. R.: 1986, ‘From Logical Universals to Historical Individuals: Buffon's Idea of Biological Species’, Singer-Polignac Symposium (in press).

  • Smart, J. J. C.: 1963, Philosophy and Scientific Realism, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart, J. J. C.: 1968, Between Science and Philosophy, Random House, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P. H. A. and R. R. Sokal: 1973, Numerical Taxonomy, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E.: 1984, ‘Sets, Species, and Evolution: Comments on Philip Kitcher's “Species”’, Philosophy of Science 51, 334–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. and T. Crovello: 1970, ‘The Biological Species Concept: A Critical Evaluation’, American Naturalist 104, 127–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L.: 1977, Processes of Organic Evolution, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L.: 1982, ‘Plant Speciation’, in C. Barigozzi (ed.), Mechanisms of Speciation, A. R. Liss, New York, 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen, L.: 1976, ‘Ecological Species, Multispecies, and Oaks’, Taxon 25, 233–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrba, E.; 1984, ‘Patterns in the Fossil Record and Evolutionary Processes’, in M. Ho and P. T. Saunders (eds.), Beyond Neo-Darwinism: An Introduction to the New Evolutionary Paradigm, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G.; 1984, ‘The Relations of Natural Forms’, in M. Ho and P. T. Saunders (eds.), Beyond Neo-Darwinism: An Introduction to the New Evolutionary Paradigm, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whewell, W.: 1840, The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, Founded upon their History J. W. Parker, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. J. D.: 1980, ‘The Genetic System of the Parthenogenetic Grasshopper Warramaba (formerly Moraba) virgo and its Sexual Relatives’, in Blackman, R. L., G. M. Hewitt, M. Ashburner (eds.), Insect Cytogenetics, Symposium X, Royal Entomological Society of London, Blackwell, London, 119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O.: 1978, ‘The Evolutionary Species Concept Reconsidered’, Systematic Zoology 27, 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O.: 1980, ‘Is the Evolutionary Species Fiction? — A Consideration of Classes, Individuals, and Historical Entities’, Systematic Zoology 29, 76–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O.: 1981a, Phylogenetics, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O.: 1981b, ‘The Metaphysics of Individuality and its Consequences for Systematic Biology’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4, 302–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. C.: 1966, Adaptation and Natural Selection, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. B.: 1981, ‘Is Biology a Different Type of Science?’, in L. W. Summer, J. Slater, and F. Wilson (eds.), Pragmatism and Purpose: Essays Presented to Thomas A. Goudge, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 278–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. B.: 1985, ‘Species Are Individuals: Theoretical Foundations for the Claim’, Philosophy of Science 52, 578–589.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 02138, Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.

    Ernst Mayr

Authors
  1. Ernst Mayr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mayr, E. Answers to these comments. Biol Philos 2, 212–225 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00057967

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00057967

Search

Navigation