Abstract
Corporate property rights present an interesting challenge to the liberal conception of property rights, for it is unclear that the self-respect of individuals is promoted by the existence of a system of property rights for corporations. I argue that it is difficult even to identify who the individuals are who are the owners of large corporations, and why these individuals should be given the same claims, protections and immunities as other property rights holders since the liabilities of corporate property rights holders are not the same as of those, for instance, who own their own homes. In this paper I first try to understand who it is who owns the large corporation. Secondly, I show that the limited liability of these corporate property owners makes the justification of corporate property rights quite difficult, from the classical liberal perspective. I end with a few brief remarks on changes in legal policy which would be consistent with my arguments on the nature and justification of corporate property rights.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Larry May is Associate Professor of Philosophy at Purdue University. He was awarded with the Exxon Education Foundation Grant during the Summer of 1982. His most important publications are ‘Vicarious Agency and Corporate Responsibility’ (Philosophical Studies 43, pp. 69–82, 1983), ‘On Conscience’ (American Philosophical Quarterly 20, pp. 57–67, 1983), ‘Professional Actions and the Liabilities of Professional Associations’ (Business and Professional Ethics Journal 2, pp. 1–14, Fall 1982), and ‘Sexual Harassment’ (Social Theory and Practice 6, pp. 249–280, 1980).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
May, L. Corporate property rights. J Bus Ethics 5, 225–232 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383630
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383630