Abstract
I argue that, contrary to thestandard view, the Newtonian universe containsno contingency. I do this by arguing (i) thatno contingency is introduced into the Newtonianuniverse by the initial conditions of physicalsystems in the universe, and (ii) that theclaim that the Newtonian universe as a wholehas contingent properties leads to incoherence.This result suggests that Newtonian physics iseither inconsistent or incomplete, since thelaws of Newtonian physics are too weak todetermine all the properties of the Newtonianuniverse uniquely.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Alper, J.S., M. Bridger, J. Earman and J.D. Norton: 2000, What Is a Newtonian System? The Failure of Energy Conservation and Determinism in Supertasks. Synthese 124: 281–293.
Bigelow, J. and R. Pargetter: 1990, Science and Necessity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bondi, H.: 1957, Some Philosophical Problems in Cosmology. In C.A. Mace (ed.), British Philosophy in the Mid-Century: A Cambridge Symposium. London: Allen and Unwin, 195–201.
Cassen, P. and D.S. Woolum: 1999, The Origin of the Solar System. In P.R. Weissman, L.A. McFadden and T.V. Johnson (eds.), Encyclopedia of the Solar System. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 35–63.
Coveney, P. and R. Highfield: 1990, The Arrow of Time: A Voyage Through Science to Solve Time's Greatest Mystery. London: W.H. Allen.
Earman, J.: 1986, A Primer on Determinism. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Earman, J. and J.D. Norton: 1998, Comments on Laraudogoitia's “Classical Particle Dynamics, Indeterminism and a Supertask”. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49: 123–133.
Grünbaum, A.: 1963, Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. New York: Knopf.
Grünbaum, A.: 1969, The Meaning of Time. In N. Rescher (ed.), Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel: A Tribute on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday. Dordrecht: Reidel, 147–177.
Layzer, D.: 1990, Cosmogenesis: The Growth of Order in the Universe. New York: Oxford University Press.
Malament, D.B.: 1995, Is Newtonian Cosmology Really Inconsistent? Philosophy of Science 62: 489–510.
McAllister, J.W.: 1999, Universal Regularities and Initial Conditions in Newtonian Physics. Synthese 120: 325–343.
Norton, J.D.: 1993, A Paradox in Newtonian Cosmology. In D. Hull, M. Forbes and K. Okruhlik (eds.), PSA 1992: Proceedings of the 1992 BiennialMeeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 2 vols. East Lansing, Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 2, 412–420.
Norton, J.D.: 1995, The Force of Newtonian Cosmology: Acceleration Is Relative. Philosophy of Science 62: 511–522.
Norton, J.D.: 1999, The Cosmological Woes of Newtonian Gravitation Theory. In H. Goenner, J. Renn, J. Ritter and T. Sauer (eds.), The Expanding Worlds of General Relativity. Boston: Birkhäuser, 271–323.
Norton, J.D.: 2002, A Paradox in Newtonian Gravitation Theory II. In J. Meheus (ed.), Inconsistency in Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 185–195.
Poincaré, H.: 1902, Science and Hypothesis. Trans. by W.J. Greenstreet. New York: Dover, 1952.
Rowe, W.L.: 1975, The Cosmological Argument. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Ruelle, D.: 1991, Chance and Chaos. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Sklar, L.: 1991, How Free Are Initial Conditions? In A. Fine, M. Forbes and L. Wessels (eds.), PSA 1990: Proceedings of the 1990 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 2 vols. East Lansing, Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 2, 551–564.
Unruh, W.: 1995, Time, Gravity, and Quantum Mechanics. In S.F. Savitt (ed.), Time's Arrows Today: Recent Physical and PhilosophicalWork on the Direction of Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23–65.
Whitrow, G.J.: 1980, The Natural Philosophy of Time, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McAllister, J.W. Absence of Contingency in the Newtonian Universe. Foundations of Science 9, 191–210 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FODA.0000025038.33021.0f
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FODA.0000025038.33021.0f