Skip to main content
Log in

Absence of Contingency in the Newtonian Universe

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

I argue that, contrary to thestandard view, the Newtonian universe containsno contingency. I do this by arguing (i) thatno contingency is introduced into the Newtonianuniverse by the initial conditions of physicalsystems in the universe, and (ii) that theclaim that the Newtonian universe as a wholehas contingent properties leads to incoherence.This result suggests that Newtonian physics iseither inconsistent or incomplete, since thelaws of Newtonian physics are too weak todetermine all the properties of the Newtonianuniverse uniquely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alper, J.S., M. Bridger, J. Earman and J.D. Norton: 2000, What Is a Newtonian System? The Failure of Energy Conservation and Determinism in Supertasks. Synthese 124: 281–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, J. and R. Pargetter: 1990, Science and Necessity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondi, H.: 1957, Some Philosophical Problems in Cosmology. In C.A. Mace (ed.), British Philosophy in the Mid-Century: A Cambridge Symposium. London: Allen and Unwin, 195–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassen, P. and D.S. Woolum: 1999, The Origin of the Solar System. In P.R. Weissman, L.A. McFadden and T.V. Johnson (eds.), Encyclopedia of the Solar System. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 35–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coveney, P. and R. Highfield: 1990, The Arrow of Time: A Voyage Through Science to Solve Time's Greatest Mystery. London: W.H. Allen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J.: 1986, A Primer on Determinism. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J. and J.D. Norton: 1998, Comments on Laraudogoitia's “Classical Particle Dynamics, Indeterminism and a Supertask”. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49: 123–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünbaum, A.: 1963, Philosophical Problems of Space and Time. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünbaum, A.: 1969, The Meaning of Time. In N. Rescher (ed.), Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel: A Tribute on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday. Dordrecht: Reidel, 147–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layzer, D.: 1990, Cosmogenesis: The Growth of Order in the Universe. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malament, D.B.: 1995, Is Newtonian Cosmology Really Inconsistent? Philosophy of Science 62: 489–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, J.W.: 1999, Universal Regularities and Initial Conditions in Newtonian Physics. Synthese 120: 325–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, J.D.: 1993, A Paradox in Newtonian Cosmology. In D. Hull, M. Forbes and K. Okruhlik (eds.), PSA 1992: Proceedings of the 1992 BiennialMeeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 2 vols. East Lansing, Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 2, 412–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, J.D.: 1995, The Force of Newtonian Cosmology: Acceleration Is Relative. Philosophy of Science 62: 511–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, J.D.: 1999, The Cosmological Woes of Newtonian Gravitation Theory. In H. Goenner, J. Renn, J. Ritter and T. Sauer (eds.), The Expanding Worlds of General Relativity. Boston: Birkhäuser, 271–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, J.D.: 2002, A Paradox in Newtonian Gravitation Theory II. In J. Meheus (ed.), Inconsistency in Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 185–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H.: 1902, Science and Hypothesis. Trans. by W.J. Greenstreet. New York: Dover, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, W.L.: 1975, The Cosmological Argument. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruelle, D.: 1991, Chance and Chaos. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, L.: 1991, How Free Are Initial Conditions? In A. Fine, M. Forbes and L. Wessels (eds.), PSA 1990: Proceedings of the 1990 Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 2 vols. East Lansing, Mich.: Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 2, 551–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unruh, W.: 1995, Time, Gravity, and Quantum Mechanics. In S.F. Savitt (ed.), Time's Arrows Today: Recent Physical and PhilosophicalWork on the Direction of Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 23–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitrow, G.J.: 1980, The Natural Philosophy of Time, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McAllister, J.W. Absence of Contingency in the Newtonian Universe. Foundations of Science 9, 191–210 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FODA.0000025038.33021.0f

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FODA.0000025038.33021.0f

Navigation