Abstract
In this paper I argue against Nancy Cartwright’s claim that we ought to abandon what she calls “fundamentalism” about the laws of nature and adopt instead her “dappled world” hypothesis. According to Cartwright we ought to abandon the notion that fundamental laws (even potentially) apply universally, instead we should consider the law-like statements of science to apply in highly qualified ways within narrow, non-overlapping and ontologically diverse domains, including the laws of fundamental physics. For Cartwright, “laws” are just locally applicable refinements of a more open-ended concept of capacities. By providing a critique of the dappled world approach’s central notion of open ended capacities and substituting this concept with an account of properties drawn from recent writing on the subject of structural realism I show that a form of fundamentalism is viable. I proceed from this conclusion to show that this form of fundamentalism provides a superior reading of case studies, such as the effective field theory program (EFT) in quantum field theory, than the “dappled world” view. The case study of the EFT program demonstrates that ontological variability between theoretical domains can be accounted for without altogether abandoning fundamentalism or adopting Cartwright’s more implausible theses.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
N Cartwright (1989) Nature’s Capacities and their Measurement Clarendon Press Oxford
N Cartwright (1999) The Dappled World: A study of the Boundaries of Science Cambridge University Press Cambridge
TY. Cao S. Schweber (1993) ArticleTitle‘The Conceptual Foundations and Philosophical Aspects of Renormalisation Theory’ Synthese 97 33–108 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01255832
TY. Cao (2003a) ArticleTitle‘Stuctural Realism and the Interpretation of Quantum Field Theory’ Synthase 136 3–24 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1024139713910
TY. Cao (2003b) ArticleTitle‘Appendix: Ontological Relativity and Fundamentality – Is QFT The Fundamental Theory?’ Synthse 136 25–30 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1024199931657
A Chakravartty (1998) ArticleTitle‘Semirealism’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29 391–408 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0039-3681(98)00013-2
S French J. Ladyman (2003a) ArticleTitle‘Remodelling Stuctural Realism: Quantum Physics and the Metaphysics of Sturucture’ Synthase 136 31–56 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1024156116636
S French J. Ladyman (2003b) ArticleTitle‘The Discussion of Objects: Between Platonism and Phenomenalism’ Synthase 136 73–77 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1024116502524
N Huggett R. Weingard (1995) ArticleTitle‘The Renormalisation Group and Effective Field Theories’ Synthese 102 171–194 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01063904
J Ladyman (1998) ArticleTitle‘What is Structural Realism’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29 409–424 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0039-3681(98)80129-5
Lamoraeux S. K. (1997). ‘Demonstration of the Casimir Force in the 0.6–6 Micrometer Range’. Physics Review Letters 78, p. 5.
D McArthur (2003) ArticleTitle‘Reconsidering Structural Realism’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33 517–536
Poincaré, H. (1905). ‘Science and Hypothesis’, reprinted in H. Poincaré (ed.), (1913), The Foundations of Science, The Science Press, Lancaster.
S. Psillos (1995) ArticleTitle‘Is Structural realism the Best of Both Worlds?’ Dialectica 49 15–46 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1746-8361.1995.tb00113.x
S Psillos (2001) ArticleTitle‘Is Structural Realism Possible’ Philosophy of Science Association 68 S13–S24
S Ruphy (2003) ArticleTitle‘Is The World Really ‘Dappled’ A Response to Cartwright’s Charge Against ‘Cross-Wise Reduction’ Philosophy of Science 70 57–67 Occurrence Handle10.1086/367869
Teller, P. (1988). ‘Three Problems of Renormalization’, in H. Brown and R. Harré (eds.), Philosophical Foundations of Quantum Field Theory. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 73–89.
P Teller (1989) ArticleTitle‘Infinite Renormalization’ Philosophy of Science 56 238–257 Occurrence Handle10.1086/289485
Teller P (2002). ‘Review of The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science by Nancy Cartwright’, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Nous 36:699–725
J Worrall (1989) ArticleTitle‘Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds’ Dialectica 43 99–124
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mcarthur, D. Contra Cartwright: Structural Realism, Ontological Pluralism and Fundamentalism About Laws. Synthese 151, 233–255 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-004-5406-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-004-5406-4