Skip to main content
Log in

Emotive equilibria

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Natural language contains many expressions with underspecified emotive content. This paper proposes a way to resolve such underspecification. Nonmonotonic inference over a knowledge base is used to derive an expected interpretation for emotive expressions in a particular context. This ‘normal’ meaning is then taken to influence the hearer’s expectations about probable interpretations, and, because of these probable interpretations, the decisions of the speaker about when use of underspecified emotive terms is appropriate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amaral P., Roberts C., Smith E. A. (2008) Review of ‘the logic of conventional implicatures’ by Christopher Potts. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 707–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher N. (1992) A default, truth-conditional semantics for the progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy 15: 463–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asher, N., & Lascarides, A. (2003). Logics of conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Asher, N., & Morreau, M. (1991). Commonsense entailment: A modal theory of nonmonotonic reasoning. In J. Mylopoulos & R. Reiter (Eds.), Proceedings of the twelfth international joint conference on artificial intelligence (pp. 387–392). Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufman.

  • Asher, N., & Morreau, M. (1995). What some generic sentences mean. In G. Carlson & J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 300–338). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Avramides, A. (2001). Grice, Davidson, and the social aspects of meaning. In G. Cosenza (Ed.), Paul Grice’s heritage (pp. 115–139). Rome: Brepols.

  • Bach K. (1999) The myth of conventional implicature. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 327–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J. (1991). Signaling games in political science. New York: Routledge.

  • Barrett J. (2009) Faithful description and the incommensurability of evolved languages. Philosophical Studies 147: 225–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver D. (2004) The optimization of discourse anaphora. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 3–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, D., & Clark, B. (2007). Sense and sensitivity. Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Crawford V., Sobel J. (1982) Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50(6): 1431–1451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. (2005). A nice derangement of epitaphs. In Truth, language, and history (pp. 89–108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Ducrot, O. (1980). Les échelles argumentatives. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.

  • Farrell J., Rabin M. (1996) Cheap talk. Journal of Economic Perspectives 10: 103–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, M. (2009). Signal to act: Game theory in pragmatics. Ph.D. thesis, ILLC/University of Amsterdam.

  • Gabbay, D., Hogger, C. J., & Robinson, J. A. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of logic in artificial intelligence and logic programming (Vol. 3). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Geurts B. (2007) Really fucking brilliant. Theoretical Linguistics 33: 209–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, B. (2010). Quantity implicatures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Gibbard, A. (2003). Thinking how to live. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Gillon B. (1990) Ambiguity, generality, and indeterminacy: Tests and definitions. Synthese 85: 391–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafen A. (1990) Biological signals as handicaps. Journal of Theoretical Biology 144: 517–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics III: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.

  • Halpern, J. (2003). Reasoning about uncertainty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Harris J., Potts C. (2010) Perspective-shifting with appositives and expressives. Linguistics and Philosophy 32: 523–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawthorne, J. (2004). Knowledge and lotteries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  • Hom C. (2008) The semantics of racial epithets. The Journal of Philosophy 105: 416–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hom, C. (2010). A puzzle about pejoratives. Philosophical Studies (to appear).

  • Jäger, G. (2007). What is a universal? On the explanatory potential of evolutionary game theory in linguistics. In K. Yoshimoto (Ed.), Proceedings of LENLS 2007. JSAI.

  • Kaplan, D. (1989). Demonstratives. In J. Almog, J. Perry, & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 481–566). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Manuscript version from 1977).

  • Kaplan, D. (1999). The meaning of ouch and oops: Explorations in the theory of meaning as use. Manuscript, UCLA.

  • Kennedy C. (2007) Vagueness and gradability: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable predicates. Linguistics and Philosophy 30(1): 1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCready, E. (2004). Two Japanese adverbials and expressive content. In R. Young (Ed.), Proceedings of SALT XIV (pp. 163–178).

  • McCready, E. (2005). The dynamics of particles. Ph.D. thesis, UTexas-Austin.

  • McCready E. (2008) What man does. Linguistics and Philosophy 31: 671–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCready E. (2010) Varieties of conventional implicature. Semantics and Pragmatics 3: 1–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCready, E. (2012). Pragmatic reliability. Manuscript, Aoyama Gakuin University.

  • McCready, E., & Schwager, M. (2009). Intensifiers. Paper presented at workshop on non-truth-conditional meaning, DGfS, Osnabruck.

  • McCready, E., & Takahashi, Y. (2011). Good reasons. In D. Gutzmann & H.-M. Gärtner (Eds.), Expressives and beyond. Johns Benjamins (to appear).

  • Merchant, J. (2001). The syntax of silence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Morzycki, M. (to appear). Expressive modification and the licensing of measure phrases. Journal of Semantics.

  • Nute, D. (1994). Defeasible logic. In D. Gabbay & C. Hogger (Eds.), Handbook of logic for artificial intelligence and logic programming (Vol. III, pp. 353–395). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Peters, S., & Westerstahl, D. (2006). Quantifiers in language and logic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Pollock, J., & Cruz, J. (1999). Contemporary theories of knowledge. Lanham, MD: Rowman Littlefield.

  • Potts, C. (2005a). Lexicalized intonational meaning. In S. Kawahara (Ed.), UMOP 30: Papers on prosody (pp. 129–146). Amherst, MA: GLSA.

  • Potts, C. (2005b). The logic of conventional implicatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Revised version of 2003 UCSC dissertation).

  • Potts C. (2007) The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33: 165–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, C., Alonso-Ovalle, L., Asudeh, A., Bhatt, R., Cable, S., Davis, C., et al. (2009). Expressives and identity conditions. Linguistic Inquiry, 40, 356–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, C., & Kawahara, S. (2004). Japanese honorifics as emotive definite descriptions. In Proceedings of SALT XIV.

  • Potts, C., & Schwarz, F. (2008). Exclamatives and heightened emotion: Extracting pragmatic generalizations from large corpora. Ms., UMass Amherst.

  • Rett J. (2011) Exclamatives, degrees, and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy 34(5): 411–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C. (1996). Information structure: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In OSUWPL volume 49: Papers in semantics. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Department of Linguistics.

  • Schroeder, M. (2008). Being for: Evaluating the semantic program of expressivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Schulz K., van Rooij R. (2006) Pragmatic meaning and non-monotonic reasoning: The case of exhaustive interpretation. Linguistics and Philosophy 29: 205–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Simons, M., Tonhauser, J., Beaver, D., & Roberts, C. (2011). What projects and why. In Proceedings of SALT 20 (pp. 309–327). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.

  • Skyrms, B. (2010). Signals: Evolution, learning, and information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Sobel, J. (to appear). Signaling games. In M. Sotomayor (Ed.), Encyclopedia of complexity and systems science. Springer.

  • van Rooij R. (2004) Signalling games select Horn strategies. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 493–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Rooij, R. (2008). Game theory and quantity implicatures. Journal of Economic Methodology, 15, 261–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Rooij, R., & Schulz, K. (2010). Nonmonotonic reasoning in interpretation. In J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), Handbook of logic and language (2nd ed., pp. 839–853). Elsevier.

  • Wang L. (2008) Epistemic comparative conditionals. Synthese 162: 133–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanuttini R., Portner P. (2003) Exclamative clauses at the syntax–semantics interface. Language 79(1): 39–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, A., & Sadock, J. (1975). Ambiguity tests and how to fail them. In Syntax and semantics (Vol. 4, pp. 1–36). New York: Academic Press.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elin McCready.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCready, E. Emotive equilibria. Linguist and Philos 35, 243–283 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-012-9118-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-012-9118-9

Keywords

Navigation