Abstract
This chapter considers the complex educational landscape in the United States and presents the results of an examination of the rationale for and history of the inclusion of nature of science (NOS) in the science curriculum, standards, and teacher education programs in the United States. The analysis begins with a definition of NOS and recommendations for its inclusion in school science and moves into a discussion of the context for the control of education in US K-12 schools (K-12 refers to public compulsory education in the United States which generally begins in kindergarten (K) at about age 5 and ends in grade 12 generally at age 17–18). A subsequent section of this chapter provides a detailed view of the nature of science in the most recent state standards resulting in a consensus recommendation for key NOS elements. A similar analysis tactic is applied to the new science education Framework for K-12 Science Education and the resulting Next Generation Science Standards. The chapter concludes with an examination of NOS in several key curriculum projects designed to incorporate this important topic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The 12 key NOS elements were used to guide the search, but researchers were attentive to and noted all instances of NOS-related language found in thousands of lines of text in 51 documents. In these documents, more than 3400 instances of NOS were located and categorized.
References
Al-Shamrani, S. M. (2008). Context, accuracy and level of inclusion of nature of science concepts in current high school physics textbooks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans, Washington, D.C.: Author.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1990). The liberal art of science: Agenda for action. Washington, DC: Author.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, Oxford University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1967). Science-A process approach, Part A: Description of the program. Washington, D.C.: Author.
Becker, B. J., Younger-Flores, K., and Wandersee, J. H. (1995). MindWorks: Making scientific concepts come alive. In F. Finley, D. Allchin, D. Rhees, and S. Fifield (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International History, Philosophy, and Science Teaching (vol. 1, pp. 115–125). Minneapolis, Minnesota: The University of Minnesota.
Brown, J. R. (2001). Who rules in science? An opinioned guide to the wars. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Conant, J. B. (1947). On understanding science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Conant, J.B. (1951). Science and common sense. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Conant, J.B. and Nash, L.K. (1957). Harvard case histories in experimental science (Vols I and II). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Council of Chief State School Officers and National Governors Association. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects.
DeBoer, G. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice, New York, Teachers College Press.
Duschl, R. A. (1985). Science Education and Philosophy of Science Twenty-Five Years of Mutually Exclusive Development. School Science and Mathematics, 85 (7) 541–555.
Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development New York, Teachers College Press.
Educational Policies Commission (1944). Education for all American youth. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Florida Department of Education. (2011). Competencies and skills required for teacher certification in Florida, sixteenth edition.
Finley, F. (1983). Science processes. Journal of research in science teaching, 20(1), 47–54.
Klopfer, L. (1964). The use of case histories in science teaching. School science and mathematics, 64, 660–666.
Klopfer, L.E. & Cooley, W.W. (1963). The history of science cases for high schools in the development of student understanding of science and scientists. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1, 33–47.
Holton, G., Rutherford, F.J. and Watson, F.G. (1981). Project physics. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Humes, E. (2007). Monkey girl: evolution, education, religion, and the battle for America’s soul. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
Hurd, P.DeH. (1960). ‘Summary’, in N.B. Henry (ed.) Rethinking Science Education: The fifty-ninth year-book of the National Society for the Study of Education, Chicago, IL, University of Chicago Press, 33–38.
Jiang, F. (2012). The Inclusion of the Nature of Science and Its Elements in Recent Popular Science Writing for Adults and Young Adults. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR.
Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Lederman, N.G. (2002). The state of science education: Subject matter without context. Electronic Journal of Science Education [on line], 3(20), December http://wolfweb.unr.edu/homepage/jcannon/ejse/lederman.html
Lind, G. (1979). The history of science cases (HOSC): Nine units of instruction in the history of science. European journal of science education, 1(3), 293–99.
Martin, M. (1972). Concepts of science education. Glenville, IL: Scott-Foresman.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (2012). Regulations for Educator Licensure and Preparation Program Approval. Last amended June 26, 2012
Matthews, M. R. (1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. New York: Routledge.
McComas, W. F. (2008). Proposals for core nature of science content in popular books on the history and philosophy of science: Lessons for science education. In Lee, Y. J. & Tan, A. L. (Eds.) Science education at the nexus of theory and practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
McComas, W. F. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths of science. In W. F. McComas (Ed.) Nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies (pp. 53–70). Kluwer (Springer) Academic Publishers.
McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., and Al-mazroa, H. (1998). A review of the role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W. F. McComas (Ed.). The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies. Kluwer (Springer) Academic Publishers.
McComas, W.F., Lee, C. & Sweeney, S. (2012, April). A Review of the U.S. State Science Standards with Respect to the Nature of Science. Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Indianapolis, IN.
McComas, W.F. & Olson, J.K. (1998). The nature of science in international science education standards documents. In W.F. McComas (Ed.) The nature of science in science education, 41–52. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer (Springer) Publishers.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary education Certification Requirements for Secondary Education. (2009). Code of State regulations 5 CSR 20–400
Moore, R., Decker, M., & Cotner, S. (2009). Chronology of the evolution-creation controversy. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Publishing Company.
National Science Teachers Association Teacher Education Standards (2003). (http://www.nsta.org/pd/ncate/docs/NSTAstandards2003.pdf). Accessed 10 May, 2012.
National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press.
National Research Council (NRC) (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts and core ideas. Washington, D.C., National Academy Press.
National Research Council (NRC) (2013). Next generation science standards. http://www.nextgenscience.org/next-generation-science-standards. Accessed 30 May, 2013
Oklahoma Subject Area Tests – Study Guide, 010 Biological Sciences. (n.d.) Oklahoma Commission for Teacher Preparation, OK-SG-FLD010-03
Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 692–720.
Parsons, K. (2003). The science wars: Debating scientific knowledge and technology. Amherst NY: Prometheus Books.
Robinson, J.T. (1968). The nature of science in science teaching. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Rothman, R. (2011). Something in common: The common core standards and the next chapter in American education. Cambridge MA: Harvard Education Press.
Schwab, J.J. (1964). ‘The teaching of science as enquiry’, in J. J. Schwab & P. F. Brandwein (eds.), The teaching of science, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 31–102.
Texas Examinations of Education Standards (TEES) (2006). Preparation manual: 136 Science 8–12. http://geft.tamu.edu/science_test.pdf. Accessed 8 June, 2012.
U.S. Census Bureau (June 22, 2011). http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/ facts_for_features_special_editions/cb11-ff15.html. Accessed 3 March, 2012.
Van Dijk, E. M. (2011). Portraying real science in science communication. Science education, 95(6), 1086–1100.
Acknowledgments
The author appreciates the many helpful suggestions offered by the anonymous reviewers. In addition the author acknowledges the extraordinary work of colleagues Drs. Carole Lee and Sophia Sweeney who helped to prepare the state-by-state NOS comparisons, Dr. Feng Jiang who assisted with the analysis of the new Framework using a specially designed computer model to discover incidences of NOS in text, and Dr. Lisa Wood who made important contributions to the section on teacher preparation standards as they relate to the inclusion of the nature of science. Needless to say, all errors, interpretations, opinions, and conclusions are the responsibility of the author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McComas, W.F. (2014). Nature of Science in the Science Curriculum and in Teacher Education Programs in the United States. In: Matthews, M. (eds) International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_61
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7654-8_61
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-7653-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-7654-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)