Skip to main content
Log in

The philosophy of logical wholism

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Words are like a film on deep water

Abstract

The present paper is one installment in a lengthy task, the replacement of atomistic interpretations of Wittgenstein's Tractatus by a wholistic interpretation on which the world-in-logical-space is not constructed out of objects but objects are abstracted from out of that space. Here, general arguments against atomism are directed toward a specific target, the four aspects of the atomistic reading of Tractatus given in the Hintikkas' Investigating Wittgenstein (Hintikka & Hintikka 1986). The aspects in question are called the semantical, metaphysical, epistemological and formal.

What follows a précis of the Hintikkas' rendering of Wittgenstein's perspective is a characterization of the wholistic interpretation, comparing Wittgenstein's world and the transcendental conditions it sets upon possible notation to a blank page and the conditions it sets upon what is about to be written there. There will not be occasion to bring arguments against each plank in the atomist's platform or in support of each facet of wholism. But there is an extended treatment of the first two aspects — the semantical and metaphysical — which takes off from Wittgenstein's determination that, in his hands, “logic must take care of itself”.

The second half of the paper contains a negative assessment of the support the atomistic reading can glean from the texts of Tractatus and Notebooks. From a detailed look into a range of relevant textual and translational issues, we find little there to encourage that interpretation and much to discourage it.

The paper closes on a preliminary consideration of one segment of the formal aspect of the Hintikkas' atomism, the idea that the analysis of Tractatus is the analysis of Russell or is, at worst, a near relative. Examination shows that Wittgenstein would have little reason to model his analysis on that of Russell. The fundamentally wholistic vision expressed in Tractatus requires a distinctively non-Russellian, decompositional version of analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anscombe, G. E. M.: 1959, An Introduction to Wittgenstein's Tractatus, 2nd ed., Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M.: 1964, A Companion to Wittgenstein's Tractatus, Cornell University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1978, Preface to Truth and Other Enigmas, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dummett, M.: 1981, The Interpretation of Frege's Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1977, Translations from the Philosophical Writings, P. Geach and M. Black (trans.), Cornell University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G.: 1979, Posthumous Writings, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gödel, K.: 1983, ‘Russell's Mathematical Logic’, in P. Benacerraf and H. Putnam (eds.), Philosophy of Mathematics. Selected Readings, 2nd edn., Cambridge University Press, pp. 447–85.

  • Hintikka, Merrill B. and Jaakko Hintikka: 1986, Investigating Wittgenstein, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraus, Karl: 1987, Über die Sprache, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, B. (ed.): 1979, Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle. Conversations Recorded by Friedrich Waismann, J. Schulte and B. McGuinness (trans.), Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, B. (ed.): 1984, Wittgenstein und der Weiner Kreis. Gespräche, aufgezeichnet von Friedrich Waismann, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Werkausgabe, Band 3, Suhrkamp.

  • Quine, W. V. O.: 1971, Set Theory and its Logic, rev. edn., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1956, Logic and Knowledge. Essays 1901–1950, R. C. Marsh (ed.), London.

  • Russell, B.: 1961, Introduction Ludwig Wittgenstein Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B.: 1985, The Philosophy of Logical Atomism, Open Court.

  • Russell, B. and A. N. Whitehead: 1967, Principia Mathematica to *56, Cambridge University Press.

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical Investigations, G. E. M. Anscombe (trans.), Macmillan, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1961, Notebooks 1914–1916, G. H. von Wright and G. E. M. Anscombe (ed.), Harper and Row, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1961, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness (trans.), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1982, Last Writings, G. H. von Wright and H. Nyman (eds.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L.: 1984, ‘Aufzeichnungen über Logik, 1913’, in Wittgenstein: Werkausgabe Band I, Suhrkamp.

Download references

Authors

Additional information

Notebooks 1914–1916

A highly condensed version of the ideas here presented will appear in the article Hintikka's Tractatus in Proceedings of the XIVth International Wittgenstein Symposium, Wittgenstein Centenary Celebration, 1991.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mccarty, D.C. The philosophy of logical wholism. Synthese 87, 51–123 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485330

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485330

Keywords

Navigation