Skip to main content
Log in

Umpire and batsman: Is it cricket to be both?

  • Religious Studies & Business Ethics
  • New Directions In An Emerging Field
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper is a response to Richard De George's essay, ‘Theological Ethics and Business Ethics’. It defends the possibility of theologically oriented approaches to business ethics by pointing out certain deficiencies in business ethics narrowly based on the premisses of analytic moral philosophy. In particular it argues, in a manner consistent with Alasdair MacIntyre's After Virtue (1981), that such a program of business ethics is insufficiently critical of its own roots in the “social fiction” of bureaucratic rationality. After showing how this ideology governs De George's negative judgments on theological approaches to business ethics, the author outlines a program of critical reflection that would draw from the intellectual traditions of both theology and philosophy in order to facilitate a dialogue in business ethics that no longer is captive in the “Iron Cage” of bureaucratic rationality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • De George, Richard T.: 1982, Business Ethics (Macmillan, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • De George, Richard T.: 1986, ‘Theological Ethics and Business Ethics’, this issue, pp. 421–432.

  • Fuchs, Josef: 1965, Natural Law: A Theological Investigation (Sheed and Ward, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen: 1979, Communication and the Evolution of Society (Beacon Press, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, Dennis P.: 1981a, Christian Realism and Liberation Theology (Orbis Books, Maryknoll, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, Dennis P.: 1981b, ‘Habermas and the Theologians’, in Religious Studies Review 7 (January), 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, Dennis P.: 1984, ‘The Ethics of Public Discourse’, Unpublished paper delivered at the annual meeting of the Society of Christian Ethics.

  • McCarthy, Thomas: 1978, The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair: 1981, After Virtue (The University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, IN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak, Michael: 1964, The Open Church (Macmillan, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Outka, Gene: 1972, Agape: An Ethical Analysis (Yale University Press, New Haven).

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John: 1969, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language (Cambridge University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Troeltsch, Ernst: 1960, The Social Teachings of the Christian Churches (Harper and Row, New York).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Dennis P. McCann is an Associate Professor of Religious Studies at De Paul University. He has served on the faculties of Reed College and Lewis and Clark College. He is the author of Christian Realism and Liberation Theology (1981) and a co-author of Polity and Praxis: A Program for American Practical Theology (1985).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCann, D.P. Umpire and batsman: Is it cricket to be both?. Journal of Business Ethics 5, 445–451 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380750

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00380750

Keywords

Navigation