Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-sgvz2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T09:42:52.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Ethical Justification of Women's Studies; or What's a Nice Girl Like You Doing in a Place Like This?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Lynette McGrath
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The feminist in academe, says Paula Bennett, is like Procne married to Tereus, “inextricably wedded to the sources of her harm.” An ethical justification of academic feminism can be found, not in cooperation and affiliation, but in the strategies currently necessary to ensure curricular and cultural diversity. Historically contextualized and strategically politicized, this ethic is founded on the claim that universities are places where we may all learn to know what is other than ourselves.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , Summer 1991 , pp. 137 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, Brenda. 1988. Women's right: Reflections on ethics and gender. In Feminist perspectives in philosophy, Griffiths, Morwenna and Whitford, Margaret, eds. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Bartkowski, Frances. 1989. Feminist utopias. Lincoln: Nebraska University Press.Google Scholar
Bartky, Sandra Lee. 1975. Toward a phenomenology of feminist consciousness. Social Theory and Practice 3(Fall): 425–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baym, Nina. 1984. The madwoman and her languages: Why I don't do feminist literary theory. Tulsa Studies in Women's Literature 3: 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, Gloria. 1983. Is women's studies an academic discipline? In Theories of women's studies, Bowles, Gloria and Klein, Renate Duelli, eds. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Christ, Carol. 1980. Diving deep and surfacing. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Coyner, Sandra. 1983. Women's studies as an academic discipline: Why and how to do it. In Theories of women's studies, Bowles, Gloria and Klein, Renate Duelli, eds. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Donovan, Josephine. 1987. Towards a women's poetics. In Feminist issues in literary scholarship. Benstock, Shari, ed. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Donovan, Josephine. 1988. Feminist theory. New York: Continuing Press.Google Scholar
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. 1982. Feminist discourse and its discontents: Language, power, and meaning. In Feminist theory: A critique of ideology, Keohane, Nannerl O., Rosaldo, Michelle Z., and Gelpi, Barbara, eds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Kathy. 1984. The feminist case against bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Fish, Stanley. 1985. Pragmatism and literary theory. Critical Inquiry 11: 433–58.Google Scholar
Flax, Jane. 1987. Postmodernism and gender relations in feminist theory. Signs 12: 621–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, Hans Georg. 1976. Philosophical hermeneutics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Graff, Gerald. 1987. Professing literature: An institutional history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Jean. 1986. Philosophy and feminist thinking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy. 1987. Rethinking modernism: Minority vs. majority theories. Cultural Critique 7(Fall): 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkesworth, Mary. 1989. Knowers, knowing, known: Feminist theory and claims of truth. Signs 14: 533–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horner, Matina. 1972. Toward an Understanding of Achievement‐Related Conflicts in Women. Journal of Social Issues 28: 157–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, Alice. 1986. Opaque texts and transparent contexts: The political difference of Julia Kristeva. In The poetics of gender, Miller, Nancy, ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kolodny, Annette. 1988. Dancing between left and right: Feminism and the academic minefield in the 1980′s. Feminist Studies 14: 453–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowe, Marian and Benston, Margaret Lowe. 1984. The uneasy alliance of feminism and academia. Women's Studies International Forum 7: 177–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Jean Baker. 1986. Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1980. Maternal thinking. Feminist Studies 6: 70–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweikart, Patrocinio. 1985. What are we doing, really?—Feminist criticism and the problem of theory. In Feminism now, Marilouise and Arthur Kroker, McCallum, Pamella, and Verthuy, Mair, eds. Montreal: Cultural Texts.Google Scholar
Smith, Paul. 1988. Discerning the subject. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar