Abstract
In this paper, I argue that, by comparing certain passages from the early Buddhist sūtras and the Mahābhārata, we can find evidence of a late- to post-Vedic “Brahmanical synthesis,” centered on the conception of Brahmā as both supreme Creator God and ultimate goal for transcending saṃsāra, that for the most part did not become a part of the Brahmanical synthesis or syntheses that came to constitute classical Hinduism. By comparing the Buddhist response to this early conception of Brahmā with the way in which Brahmā is treated in certain sectarian portions of the Mahābhārata, I then argue further that the Buddhist critique of Brahmā as supreme deity was in part conceded by the Brahmanical tradition, and sectarian accounts of supreme godhead sought to reconcile pravṛtti and nivṛtti values more subtly than the crude juxtaposition offered by the earlier Brahmanical synthesis offered by Brahmā. The result was that Brahmā was relegated to an inferior position as a fully saṃsāric demiurge, a narrative found first in certain parts of the Mahābhārata and then continued throughout most of the Purāṇas.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bailey G. (1983) The mythology of Brahmā. Oxford University Press, Delhi
Bailey G., Mabbett I. (2003) The sociology of early Buddhism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Biardeau M. (1968) Some more considerations about textual criticism. Purāṇa 10(2): 115–123
Biardeau, M. (2002). Le Mahābhārata: Un récit fondateur du brahmanisme et son interprétation (2 Vols). Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
Brockington J. (1998) The Sanskrit epics. Leiden, Brill
Bronkhorst J. (2007) Greater Magadha: Studies in the culture of early India. Leiden, Brill
Bronkhorst J. (2011) Buddhism in the shadow of Brahmanism. Leiden, Brill
Chakrabarti K. (2001) Religious process: The Purāṇas and the making of a regional tradition. Oxford University Press, New Delhi
Chatterjee A. (1967) Padma-Purāṇa—a study. Calcutta, Sanskrit College
Fitzgerald, J. L. (1980). The Mokṣa anthology of the great Bhārata: An initial survey of structural issues, themes, and rhetorical strategies. PhD Dissertation, University of Chicago.
Fitzgerald J.L. (1983) The great epic of India as religious rhetoric: A fresh look at the Mahābhārata. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 51(4): 611–630
Fitzgerald J.L. (2001) Making Yudhiṣṭhira the king: The dialectics and the politics of violence in the Mahābhārata. Rocznik Orientalistyczny 54(1): 63–92
Fitzgerald J.L. (2003) The many voices of the Mahābhārata. Journal of the American Oriental Society 123(4): 803–818
Fitzgerald J.L., Fitzgerald J.L. (2004) The Mahābhārata (Vol. 7). University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Gombrich R. (1996) How Buddhism began: The conditioned genesis of the early teachings. Jordan Lectures in Comparative Religion (Vol. 17). Athlone, London
Gombrich R. (2001) A visit to Brahmā the heron. Journal of Indian Philosophy 29(1): 95–108
Gombrich R. (2009) What the Buddha thought. Equinox, London
Gonda J. (1950) Notes on Brahman. Utrecht, J. L. Beyers
Gonda J. (1968) The Hindu trinity. Anthropos 63: 212–226
Hiltebeitel A. (1990) The ritual of battle: Kṛṣṇa in the Mahābhārata. SUNY Press, Albany
Hiltebeitel A. (2001) Rethinking the Mahābhārata: A reader’s guide to the education of the Dharmaking. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Hiltebeitel A. (2004) More rethinking the Mahābhārata: Toward a politics of Bhakti. Indo-Iranian Journal 47: 203–227
Hiltebeitel, A. (2005a). Buddhism and the Mahābhārata: Boundary dynamics in textual practice. In F. Squarcini (Ed.), Boundaries, dynamics, and construction of traditions in South Asia (pp. 107–131). Florence: Firenze University Press.
Hiltebeitel, A. (2005b). Weighing orality and writing in the Sanskrit epics. In P. Koskikallio (Ed.), Epics, Khilas, and Purāṇas: Continuities and ruptures (pp. 81–111). Zagreb: Croatian Academy of Sciences and Arts.
Hiltebeitel, A. (2006). The Nārāyaṇīya and the early reading communities of the Mahābhārata. In P. Olivelle (Ed.), Between the empires: Society in India 300 BCE to 400 CE (pp. 227–256). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holdredge B. (1996) Veda and Torah. SUNY Press, Albany
Inden R. et al (1992) Changes in the Vedic priesthood. In: Hoek A.W. (eds) Ritual, state and history in South Asia: Essays in honour of J.C.. Heesterman. Leiden, Brill, pp 556–577
Kulke H., Rothermund D. (1998) A history of India (3rd ed). Routledge, London
Lévi S. (1929) The Mahabharata (review article). Journal Asiatique 215: 345–348
Lubin T. (2005) The transmission, patronage, and prestige of Brahmanical Piety from the Mauryas to the Guptas. In: Squarcini F. (eds) Boundaries, dynamics, and construction of traditions in South Asia.. Firenze University Press, Florence, pp 77–103
Malinar A. (2007) The Bhagavadgītā: Doctrines and contexts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Norman K.R. (1991) Theravāda Buddhism and Brahmanical Hinduism: Brahmanical terms in a Buddhist guise. The Buddhist Forum 2: 193–200
Nyāyakandali of Sridhara. (1984). The Praśastapāda Bhāshya with Commentary. Ed. Vindhyesvari Prasad Dvivedin (2nd ed.). Delhi: Sri Satguru Publications.
Olivelle, P. (1993). The Āśrama system: The history and hermeneutics of a religious institution. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers. Olivelle, P. (1998). The early Upanis:ads: Annotated text and translation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Olivelle, P. (1998). The early Upaniṣads: Annotated text and translation. New York: Oxford University press
Shulman D. (1986) Terror of symbols and symbols of terror: Notes on the myth of Śiva as Stāṇu. History of Religions 26(2): 101–124
Szczurek, P. (2008). Prajñāvādāṃś ca bhāṣase: Polemics with Buddhism in the early parts of the Bhagavadgītā. In R. Gombrich & C. Scherrer-Schaub (Eds.), Buddhist studies, papers of the 12th world Sanskrit conference. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.
Thapar R. (2000) Cultural pasts. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Walshe M., Walshe M. (1995) The long discourses of the Buddha: A translation of the Dīgha Nikāya. Wisdom Publications, Boston
White D.G. (1986) ‘Dakkhin: a’ and ‘Agnicayana’: An extended application of Paul Mus’s typology. History of Religions 26(2): 188–213
Witzel, M. (1989). Tracing the Vedic dialects. In C. Caillat (Ed.), Dialectes dans les littératures indoaryennes. Paris: Collége de France, Institut de civilisation indienne: Diffusion de Boccard.
Witzel, M. (1997). The development of the Vedic Canon and its schools: The social and political milieu. In M. Witzel (Ed.), Inside the texts, beyond the texts (pp. 257–348). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Department of Sanskrit and Indian Studies. Brahmanical Synthesis
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McGovern, N. Brahmā: An Early and Ultimately Doomed Attempt at a Brahmanical Synthesis. J Indian Philos 40, 1–23 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-011-9146-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-011-9146-8