A Human Rights-based Approach to Participation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26522/ssj.v16i3.3583Keywords:
Democratic Innovations, Human Rights, Deliberative democracy, Participatory DemocracyAbstract
This article proposes a systematic approach to designing and assessing participatory processes, built from principles in the field of human rights. It argues that participatory processes should be organised around human rights principles which provide detailed but flexible guidance on participatory processes. Drawing from well-established human rights principles and the commentary of human rights bodies on participation, the article outlines a framework that can be used to advocate for, establish, implement, and evaluate participatory processes. It addresses four normative questions relating to participation: what decisions require participation, who should participate, how should participation be implemented, and what consequences should it have on subsequent decisions with human rights norms informing each of these questions.
References
Adamson, D., & Bromiley, R. (2013). Community empowerment: Learning from practice in community regeneration. International Journal of Public Sector Management 26(3), 190-202.
Airey v. Ireland, 2 EHRR 305 (European Court of Human Rights 1979).
Arai-Takahashi, Y. (2001). The margin of appreciation doctrine and the principle of proportionality in the jurisprudence of the ECHR. Intersentia.
CESCR (Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). (1989). General Comment No. 1: Reporting by States parties, U.N. Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.6.
CESCR (Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). (1990). General Comment No. 3: The nature of States parties’ obligations, U.N. Doc. E/1992/23.
CESCR (Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). (1997). General Comment No. 7: The right to adequate housing: Forced evictions, U.N. Doc. E/1998/22.
CESCR (Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). (1999). General Comment No. 12: The right to adequate food, U.N. Doc. E/C.12/1999/5.
CESCR (Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). (2000). General Comment No. 14: The right to health, U.N. Doc. E/C.12/2000/4.
CESCR (Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). (2003). General Comment No. 15: The right to water, U.N. Doc. E/C.12/2002/11.
CESCR (Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). (2006). General Comment No. 18: The right to work, U.N. Doc. E/C.12/GC/18.
CESCR (Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). (2007). General Comment No. 19: The right to social security, U.N. Doc. E/C.12/GC/19.
CESCR (Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). (2009a). General Comment No. 20: Non-discrimination in economic, social and cultural rights, U.N. Doc. E/C.12/GC/20.
CESCR (Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). (2009b). General Comment No. 21: Right of everyone to take part in cultural life, U.N. Doc. E/C.12/GC/21.
CESCR (Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). (2012). Concluding observations on the initial report of Mauritania, U.N. Doc. E/C.12/MRT/CO/1.
CESCR (Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). (2016). General comment No. 22: The right to sexual and reproductive health, U.N. Doc. E/C.12/GC/22.
Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015.
Donnelly, J. (1984). Cultural relativism and universal human rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 6(4), 400–419.
Dworkin, R. (2013). Taking rights seriously. Bloomsbury.
Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109-142). MIT Press.
Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513-522.
Gaventa, J. (1998). The scaling-up and institutionalization of PRA: Lessons and challenges. In J. Blackburn & J. Holland (Eds.), Who changes?: Institutionalizing participation in development (pp. 153-166). Intermediate Technology Publications.
Gaventa, J. (2002). Exploring citizenship, participation and accountability. IDS Bulletin, 33(2), 1-14.
Geissel, B., & Newton, K. (Eds.). (2012). Evaluating democratic innovations: Curing the democratic malaise?. Routledge.
Geissel, B. (2012). Impacts of democratic innovations in Europe. In B. Geissel & K. Newton (Eds.), Evaluating democratic innovations: Curing the democratic malaise?. Routledge.
Gigler, B. -S., Custer, S., Bailur, S., Dodds, E., & Asad, S. (2014). Closing the feedback loop: Can technology amplify citizen voices. World Bank.
Gould, C. (2004). Globalizing democracy and human rights. Cambridge University Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Polity Press.
Held, D. (1996). Models of democracy (2nd ed.). Blackwell.
Human Rights Committee. (2014). Concluding observations on the fifth periodic report of Sri Lanka, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/LKA/CO/5.
ICESCR (International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), Dec. 16, 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 3.
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Dec. 16, 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171.
Leal, P. A. (2011). Participation: The ascendancy of a buzzword in the neo-liberal era. In A. Cornwall (Ed.), The participation reader (pp. 70-81). Zed Books.
McMurry, N. (2018). A human-rights based approach to participation: Outline and assessment. In T. Pirc (Ed.), Participation, culture and democracy: Interdisciplinary perspectives on public engagement and social communication (pp. 133-151). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
McMurry, N. (2019). Applying human rights to enable participation. International Journal of Human Rights Law, 23(7), 1049-1073.
McMurry, N. (2020). A right for protest to be heard. Seton Hall Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations, 21(2), 93-108.
McMurry, N. (2023, forthcoming). Participation and iemocratic Innovation under international human rights law. Routledge.
Mowbray, A. (2012). Cases, materials, and commentary on the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford University Press.
Nolan, A., O’Connell, R., & Harvey, C. (Eds.). (2013). Human rights and public finance: Budgets and the promotion of economic and social rights. Hart Publishing.
Occupiers of 51 Olivia Road v. Johannesburg and Others (CCT 24/07), ZACC 1 (South African Constitutional Court 2008).
Opinión Consultiva OC-27/21 solicitada por la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, Series A, No. 27 (Inter-American Court of Human Rights 2021).
Osman v. United Kingdom, 29 EHRR 245 (European Court of Human Rights 1998).
Parés, M., Bonet-Martí, J., & Martí-Costa, M. (2012). Does participation really matter in urban regeneration policies? Exploring governance networks in Catalonia (Spain). Urban Affairs Review, 48(2), 238-271.
Parker, S., Spires, P., Farook, F., & Mean, M. (2008). State of trust: How to build better relationships between councils and the public. DEMOS.
R. on the application of Bernard v. Enfield LBC, EWHC Admin 2282 (The Administrative Court, Queen’s Bench Division 2002).
Rahnema, M. (1992). Participation. In W. Sachs (Ed.), The development dictionary (pp. 116-131). Zed Books.
Saul, B., Kinley, D., & Mowbray, J. (2014). The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Commentary, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press.
Saxena, N. C. (2011). What is meant by people’s participation. In A. Cornwall (Ed.), The participation reader (pp. 31-33). Zed Books.
Schabas, W. A. (2019). Nowak's CCPR commentary: U.N. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (3rd ed.). N. P. Engel Verlag.
Sen, A. (1999). Democracy as a universal value. Journal of Democracy, 10(3), 3-17.
Shah, A. (Ed.) (2007). Participatory budgeting. World Bank.
Skogly, S. I., & Gibney, M. (2002). Transnational human rights obligations. Human Rights Quarterly, 24(3), 781-798.
Smith, G. (2009). Democratic innovations. Cambridge University Press.
Vitale, D. (2006). Between deliberative and participatory democracy: A contribution on Habermas. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 32(6), 739-766.
Warren, M. (2009). Governance-driven democratization. Critical Policy Studies, 3(1), 3-13.
Woolrych, R., & Sixsmith, J. (2013), Placing well‐being and participation within processes of urban regeneration. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(3), 216-231.
Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nicholas McMurry, Siobhan O'Sullivan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles are published in Studies in Social Justice under the Creative Commons "Attribution/Non-Commercial/No Derivative Works" Canada licence.
The copyright for the articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles may be used, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. The submission of a manuscript to Studies in Social Justice will be taken to mean that the author understands and agrees to the following:
- the manuscript represents original work not previously published;
- the manuscript is not being considered elsewhere for publication in the same language (publication elsewhere in an alternate language does not preclude acceptance of submission to Studies in Social Justice);
- appropriate written copyright permissions have been secured for republication of any copyrighted material contained in the manuscript;
- copyright for this article is retained by the author, with first publication rights granted to Studies in Social Justice;
- by virtue of its appearance in this open access journal, it is understood that the article is freely available for use, with proper attribution, for educational and other non-commercial purposes;
- reuse of the article for commercial purposes by anyone other than the author requires permission of the author;
- the author agrees to cite Studies in Social Justice as a source whenever h/she later republishes or reuses the article in other platforms.
