Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/2440/111191
Citations | ||
Scopus | Web of Science® | Altmetric |
---|---|---|
?
|
?
|
Type: | Book chapter |
Title: | Immediate judgment and non-cognitive ideas: The pervasive and persistent in the misreading of Kant’s Aesthetic formalism |
Author: | McMahon, J. |
Citation: | The Palgrave Kant Handbook, 2017 / Altman, M. (ed./s), Ch.19, pp.425-446 |
Publisher: | Palgrave Macmillan |
Publisher Place: | UK |
Issue Date: | 2017 |
Series/Report no.: | Palgrave Handbooks in German Idealism |
ISBN: | 1137546557 9781137546555 |
Editor: | Altman, M. |
Statement of Responsibility: | Jennifer A. McMahon |
Abstract: | Kant’s aesthetic theory is misinterpreted when understood in terms of uncritical empiricism. By analyzing standard interpretations of Kant’s aesthetic formalism, McMahon argues that the meaning of direct/immediate and non-cognitive judgment is distorted when taken out of the context of Kant’s critical system of the mind. She concludes by drawing out the implications for understanding Kant’s aesthetic theory in the contemporary context. |
Rights: | The Author(s) 2017 |
DOI: | 10.1057/978-1-137-54656-2_19 |
Grant ID: | http://purl.org/au-research/grants/arc/DP150103143 |
Published version: | https://www.palgrave.com/de/book/9781137546555 |
Appears in Collections: | Aurora harvest 8 Philosophy publications |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.