Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effect of Moral Intensity on Ethical Judgment

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Following an extensive review of the moral intensity literature, this article reports the findings of two studies (one between-subjects, the other within-subject) that examined the effect of manipulated and perceived moral intensity on ethical judgment. In the between-subjects study participants judged actions taken in manipulated high moral intensity scenarios to be more unethical than the same actions taken in manipulated low moral intensity scenarios. Findings were mixed for the effect of perceived moral intensity. Both probable magnitude of consequences (a factor consisting of magnitude of consequences, probability of effect, and temporal immediacy) and social consensus had a significant effect; proximity did not. In the within-subject study manipulated moral intensity had a significant effect on ethical judgment, but perceived moral intensity did not. Regression of ethical judgment on age, gender, major, and the three perceived moral intensity factors was significant between-subjects, but not within-subject. Ethical judgment was found to be a more robust predictor of intention than perceived moral intensity using a within-subject design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barnett T. (2001). Dimensions of Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision Making: An Empirical Study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 31:1038–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman M. H., Loewenstein G. F., White S. B. (1992). Reversals of Preference in Allocation Decisions: Judging an Alternative Versus Choosing Among Alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly 37:220–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman M. H., Moore D. A., Tenbrunsel A. E., Wade-Benzoni K. A., Blount S. (1999). Explaining how Preferences Change Across Joint Versus Separate Evaluation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 39:41–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, M. H.: 1980, Systextual Design, Unpublished manuscript

  • Birnbaum M. H. (1982). Controversies in Psychological Measurement. In: Wegener B. (eds) Social Attitudes and Psychophysical Measurement. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 401–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass D. J., Butterfield K. K., Skaggs B. C. (1998) Relationships And Unethical Behavior: A Social Network Perspective. Academy of Management Review 23:14–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield K. D., Treviño L. K., Weaver G. R. (2000). Moral Awareness In Business Organizations: Influences of Issue-Related and Social Context Factors. Human Relations 53:981–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins D. (1989). Organizational Harm, Legal Condemnation and Stakeholder Retaliation: A Typology, Research Agenda and Application. Journal of Business Ethics 8:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis M. A., Johnson N. B., Ohmer D. G. (1998). Issue-Contingent Effects on Ethical Decision Making: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Journal of Business Ethics 17:373–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decker W. H. (1994). Unethical Decisions and Attributions: Gains, Losses, and Concentration of Effect. Psychological Reports 75:1207–1214

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubinsky A. J., Loken B. (1989). Analyzing Ethical Decision Making in Marketing. Journal of Business Research 19:83–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg D., (1999). Eyeing the Competition. Time 153:58–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell O. C., Gresham L. G. (1985). A Contingency Framework for Understanding Ethical Decision Making in Marketing. Journal of Marketing 49:87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell O. C., Gresham L. G., Fraedrich J. (1989). A Synthesis of Ethical Decision Models for Marketing. Journal of Macromarketing 11:55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey B. F. (2000a). The Impact of Moral Intensity on Decision Making in a Business Context. Journal of Business Ethics 26:181–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey B. F. (2000b). Investigating Moral Intensity with the World-Wide Web: A Look at Participant Reactions and a Comparison of Methods. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 32:423–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia D. A. (1992). Pinto Fires and Person Ethics: A Script Analysis of Missed Opportunities. Journal of Business Ethics 11:379–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gullo, K.: 2002, Enron Approached White House. Retrieved July 23, 2004, from http://www.bernie. house.gov/documents/articles/20020110180500.asp

  • Hegarty W. H., Sims H. P. Jr. (1978). Some Determinants of Unethical Decision Behavior: An Experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology 63:451–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty W. H., Sims H. P. Jr. (1979). Organizational Philosophy, Policies, and Objectives Related to Unethical Decision Behavior: A Laboratory Experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology 64:331–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, D. (2003). MCI Blocked from New Government Contracts. Retrieved July 23, 2004, from http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/news/breaking_ news/6429267.htm

  • Hsee C. K. (1998). Less Is Better: When Low-Value Options are Valued more Highly than High-Valued Options. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 11:107–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsee C. K., Blount S, Loewenstein G. F., Bazerman M. H. (1999) Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Options: A Review and Theoretical Analysis. Psychological Bulletin 125:576–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt S. D., Vitell S. (1986). A General Theory of Marketing Ethics. Journal of Macromarketing 6:5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen E., Von Glinow M. A. (1985). Ethical Ambivalence and Organization Reward Systems. Academy of Management Review 10:814–822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones C., Aronson E. (1973). Attribution of Fault to a Rape Victim as a Function of the Respectability of the Victim. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 26:415–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones G. E., Kavanagh M. J. (1996). An Experimental Examination of the Effects of Individual and Situational Factors on Unethical Behavioral Intentions in the Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics 15:511–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. M. (1991). Ethical Decision Making By Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review 16:366–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M., V. L. Huber: 1992, Issue Contingency in Ethical Decision Making. Paper presented at the 3rd Annual Conference of the International Association for Business and Society, Leuven, Belgium

  • Kahneman D., Miller D. T. (1986) Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review 93:136–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon J. M., Harvey R. J. (2006). An Analysis of the Factor Structure of Jones’ Moral Intensity Construct. Journal of Business Ethics 64:381–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris S. A., McDonald R. A. (1995). The Role of Moral Intensity in Moral Judgments: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Business Ethics 14:715–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowlis S. M., Simonson I. (1997). Attribute-Task Compatibility as a Determinant of Consumer Preference Reversals. Journal of Marketing Research 34:205–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach R. E., Robin D. P. (1988). Some Initial Steps Toward Improving the Measurement of Ethical Evaluations of Marketing Activities. Journal of Business Ethics 7:871–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach R. E., Robin D. P. (1990). Toward The Development of a Multidimensional Scale for Improving Evaluations of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 9:639–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest J. R. (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritov I. (2000). The Role of Expectations in Comparisons. Psychological Review 107:345–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer M. S. (1996). The Role of Moral Intensity and Fairness Perception in Judgments of Ethicality: A Comparison of Managerial Professionals and the General Public. Journal of Business Ethics 15:469–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer M. S. (1998). The Role of Subjective Concerns and Characteristics of the Moral Issue in Moral Considerations. British Journal of Psychology 89:663–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer M., Mitchell S., Turner J. (1998). Consideration of Moral Intensity in Ethicality Judgements: Its Relationship with Whistle-Blowing and Need-For-Cognition. Journal of Business Ethics 17:527–541

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer M. S., Singer A. E. (1997). Observer Judgements about Moral Agents’ Ethical Decisions: The Role of Scope of Justice and Moral Intensity. Journal of Business Ethics 16:473–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi A., Vitell S. J., Kraft K. L. (1996). Moral Intensity and Ethical Decision-Making of Marketing Professionals. Journal of Business Research 36:245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stead W. E., Worrell D. L., Stead J. G. (1990). An Integrative Model For Understanding and Managing Ethical Behavior in Business Organizations. Journal of Business Ethics 9:233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Street M. D., Douglas S. C., Geiger S. W., Martinko M. J. (2001) The Impact of Cognitive Expenditure on the Ethical Decision-Making Process: The Cognitive Elaboration Model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86:256–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S. E., Thompson S. C. (1982). Stalking the Elusive “Vividness” Effect. Psychological Review 89:155–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño L. K. (1986). Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person–Situation Interactionist Model. Academy of Management Review 11:601–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño L. K., Nelson K. A. (2004). Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk about How to do it Right (3rd ed). Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño L. K., Youngblood S. A. (1990). Bad Apples in Bad Barrels: A Causal Analysis of Ethical Decision-Making Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 75:378–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsalikis J., Seaton B., Shepherd P. L. (2001). Relativism in Ethical Research: A Proposed Model and Mode of Inquiry. Journal of Business Ethics 32:231–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfson, H.: 1999, Johnson & Johnson First Sponsor to Drop Support for 2002 Games. The Seattle Post-Intelligencer, p. E10

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Management and Marketing, Christopher Newport University, 1 University Place, Newport News, VA, 23606, U.S.A.

    Joan Marie McMahon & Robert J. Harvey

Authors
  1. Joan Marie McMahon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert J. Harvey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan Marie McMahon.

Additional information

Joan M. McMahon is an Assistant Professor of Management in the Luter School of Business at Christopher Newport University, teaching courses in Organizational Behavior, Leadership, and Human Resources. She has a B.A. in Speech from the State University of New York, College at Oneonta; an M. Ed. in Early Childhood Education from James Madison University; and an M.S. and Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.

Robert J. Harvey is an Associate Professor of Psychology at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. He has a B.A. in Psychology and an M.A. in Experimental Psychology from the University of Missouri at Kansas City, and a Ph.D. in Industrial/Organizational Psychology from Ohio State University. Dr. Harvey has authored a number of articles in the Journal of Applied Psychology, the Journal of Personality Assessment, Personnel Psychology, and others. He is the author of the chapter on job analysis in the Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McMahon, J.M., Harvey, R.J. The Effect of Moral Intensity on Ethical Judgment. J Bus Ethics 72, 335–357 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9174-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9174-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation