Skip to main content
Log in

Existential Sentences without Existential Quantification

  • Published:
Linguistics and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

REFERENCES

  • Abbott, Barbara: 1997, ‘Definiteness and Existentials’, Language 73, 103–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Lee: 1970, ‘Double Negatives’, Linguistic Inquiry 1, 169–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, Catherine: 1991, The Historical Development of the it-Cleft, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

  • Barwise, Jon and Robin Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’, Linguistics & Philosophy 4, 159–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blutner, Reinhard: 1993, ‘Dynamic Generalized Quantifiers and Existential Sentences in Natural Languages’, Journal of Semantics 10, 33–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breivik, Leiv Egil: 1990, Existential There: A Synchronic and Diachronic Study, Novus Press, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Greg: 1977a, ‘Amount Relatives’, Language 53, 520–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Greg: 1977b, Reference to Kinds in English, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Published 1980 by Garland Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, Greg: 1991. Cases of Really Direct Reference: Perception and Ostension?, Paper delivered at SALT I.

  • Chierchia, Gennaro and Raymond Turner: 1988, ‘Semantics and Property Theory’, Linguistics & Philosophy 11, 261–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comorovski, Ileana: 1991, ‘Partitives and the Definiteness Effect’, in Dawn Bates (ed.), Proceedings of WCCFL 10, Stanford University Press, Stanford CA, pp. 91–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, Molly: 1990, The Syntactic Roots of Semantic Partition, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Doron, Edit: 1983, Verbless Predicates in Hebrew, Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.

  • Gawron, Jean Mark: 1995, ‘Comparatives, Superlatives, and Resolution’, Linguistics and Philosophy 18, 333–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1990, ‘Dynamic Montague Grammar’, in L. Kalmán and L. Polos (eds.), Papers from the Second Symposium on Logic and Language, Akademiai Kiado, Budapest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Published 1989 by Garland Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, Irene: 1987, ‘Where Does the Definiteness Effect Apply?’, in Reuland and ter Meulen 1987, pp. 21–42.

  • Herburger, Elena: 1997, ‘Focus and Weak Noun Phrases’, Natural Language Semantics 5, 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higginbotham, James: 1987, ‘Indefinites and Predication’, in Reuland and ter Meulen 1987, 43–70.

  • de Hoop, Helen: 1992, Case Configuration and Noun Phrase Interpretation, Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen. Published 1997 by Garland Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Lyle: 1975, The English Existential, Niemeyer, Tübingen.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kamp, Hans: 1981, ‘A Theory of Truth and Interpretation’, reprinted in 1984 in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Truth, Interpretation, and Information, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 1–41.

  • Keenan, Edward: 1987, ‘A Semantic Definition of “Indefinite NP”’, in Reuland and ter Meulen 1987, pp. 286–317.

  • Klein, Ewan: 1981, ‘The Interpretation of Adjectival, Nominal and Adverbial Comparatives’, in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Part 2. Amsterdam, Mathematisch Centrum, pp. 381–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Ewan and Ivan Sag: 1985, ‘Type Driven Translation’, Linguistics and Philosophy 8, 163–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladusaw, William A.: 1982, ‘Semantic Constraints on the English Partitive Construction’, in Proceedings of WCCFL 1.

  • Ladusaw, William A.: 1992, ‘Expressing Negation’, in C. Barker and D. Dowty (eds.), Proceedings of SALT II, OSU Working Papers in Linguistics, pp. 237–259.

  • Ladusaw, William A.: 1994, ‘Thetic and Categorical, Stage and Individual, Weak and Strong’, in M. Harvey and L. Santelmann (eds.), Proceedings of SALT IV, Corneli University DMLL, Ithaca, New York, pp. 220–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, Godehard: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms: a Lattice-Theoretic Approach’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 302–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, F. S.: 1990, Scope Dependency in English and Chinese, Ph.D. Dissertation, UCLA.

  • Lumsden, Michael: 1988, Existential Sentences: Their Structure and Meaning, Croom Helm, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, James D.: 1981, Everything that Linguists have Always Wanted to Know About Logic* *but were ashamed to ask, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, Louise: 1992, An Interpretation for the English Existential Construction, Ph.D. dissertation, UCSC. Published 1997 by Garland Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNally, Louise: 1995, Using Property-Type NPs to Build Complex Event Descriptions, Paper delivered at the CLSI Workshop on Logic, Language, and Computation, Stanford, CA.

  • Milsark, Gary: 1974, Existential Sentences in English, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT. Published 1979 by Garland Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milsark, Gary: 1977, ‘Peculiarities of the Existential Construction in English’, Linguistic Analysis 3, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara H.: 1987, ‘Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type-Shifting Principles’, in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, Foris, Dordrecht, pp. 115–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partee, Barbara H. and Mats Rooth: 1983, ‘Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity’, in R. Bauerle et al. (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 361–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, Ellen: 1981, ‘Toward a Taxonomy of Given/New Information’, in P. Cole (ed.), Radical Pragmatics, Academic Press, New York, pp. 223–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince, Ellen: 1988, ‘The Discourse Function of Yiddish Expletive ES and Subject-Postposing’, IPrA Papers in Pragmatics 2, 176–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuland, Eric and Alice ter Meulen: 1987, The Representation of (In) definiteness, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Craige: 1987, Modal Subordination, Anaphora, and Distributivity, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, Published 1990 by Garland Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooth, Mats: 1985, Association with Focus, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Safir, Ken: 1987, ‘What Explains the Definiteness Effect?’, in Reuland and ter Meulen 1987, pp. 71–97.

  • Stowell, Tim: 1978, ‘What Was There Before There Was There’, in D. Farkas et al. (eds.), Proceedings of CLS 14, 458–471.

  • Strawson, P. F.: 1959, Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics, Routledge, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Geenhoven, Veerle: 1996, Semantic Incorporation and Indefinite Descriptions: Semantic and Syntactic Aspects of Noun Incorporation in West Greenlandic, Doctoral Dissertation, Universität Tübingen.

  • Ward, Gregory and Betty Birner: 1995, ‘Definiteness and the English Existential’, Language 71, 722–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, Gregory, Richard Sproat, and Gail McKoon: 1991, ‘A Pragmatic Analysis of So-Called Anaphoric Islands’, Language 67, 439–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, Karina: 1991, Studies in the Semantics of Generic Noun Phrases, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.

  • Williams, Edwin: 1983, ‘Semantic vs. Syntactic Categories’, Linguistics & Philosophy 6, 423–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Edwin: 1994, Thematic Structure in Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucchi, Alessandro: 1995, ‘The Ingredients of Definiteness and the Definiteness Effect’, Natural Language Semantics 3, 33–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McNally, L. Existential Sentences without Existential Quantification. Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 353–392 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005389330615

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005389330615

Keywords

Navigation