Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Two “EvoDevos”

  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen GE (1986) T. H. Morgan and the split between embryology and genetics, 1910–35. In: A History of Embryology (Horder TJ, Witkowski JA, Wylie CC, eds), 1910–1935. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundson R (2007) The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur W (2002) The emerging conceptual framework of evolutionary developmental biology. Nature 415: 757–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batten D, Salthe NS, Boschetti F (2008) Visions of evolution: Self-organization proposes what natural selection disposes. Biological Theory 3: 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beloussov LV, Grabovsky VI (2007) Information about a form (on the dynamic laws of morphogenesis). Biosystems 87: 204–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll SB (2005) Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo Devo and the Making of the Animal Kingdom. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll SB (2008) Evo-Devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: A genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell 134: 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuong C, Wu P, Plikus M, Jiang TX (2006) Engineering stem cells into organs: Topobiological transformations demonstrated by beak, feather, and other ectodermal organ morphogenesis. Current Topics in Developmental Biology 72: 237–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyne JA (2005) Switching on evolution. Nature 435: 1029–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dassow G, Meir E, Munro EM, Odell GM (2000) The segment polarity network is a robust developmental module. Nature 406: 188–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies PCW (1989) The Physics of Complex Organisation. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Depew DJ, Weber BH (1996) Darwinism Evolving: Systems Dynamics and the Genealogy of Natural Selection. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detrick RJ, Dickey D, Kintner CR (1990) The effects of N-cadherin misexpressionon morphogenesis in Xenopus embryos. Neuron 4: 493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forgacs G, Newman SA (2005) Biological Physics of the Developing Embryo. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gayon J (2000) From measurement to organization: A philosophical scheme for the history of the concept of heredity. In: The Concept of the Gene in Development and Evolution (Beurton PJ, Falk R, Rheinberger HJ, eds), 69–90. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gehring WJ, Hiromi Y (1986) Homeotic genes and the homeobox. Annual Review of Genetics 20: 147–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert S (2003) Evo-devo, devo-evo, and devgen-popgen. Biology and Philosophy 18: 347–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert S, Opitz JM, Raff RA (1996) Resynthesizing evolutionary and developmental biology. Developmental Biology 173: 357–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldschmidt R (1940) The Material Basis of Evolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin BC (1982) Development and evolution. Journal of Theoretical Biology 97: 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin BC (1985) What are the causes of morphogenesis? BioEssays 3: 32–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin BC (1994) How the Leopard Changed Its Spots: The Evolution of Complexity. New York: Scribners.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (1989) Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ (2002) The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn M, Wray G (2002) The g-value paradox. Evolution and Development 4: 73–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall BK (2000) Evo-devo or devo-evo: Does it matter? Evolution and Development 2: 177–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halley JD, Winkler DA (2008) Consistent concepts of self-organization and self-assembly. Complexity 14: 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamburger V (1980) Embriology and the modern synthesis in evolutionary theory. In: The Evolutionary Synthesis (Mayr E, Provine W, eds), 97–112. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes AJ, Lambert DM (1984) Functionalism, structuralism, and “ways of seeing.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 111: 787–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman S (1993) The Origins of Order: Self-Organization and Selection in Evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman S (1995) At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. London: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • King MC, Wilson AC (1975) Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science 188: 107–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner M, Gerhart J, Modliszewski JL (2000) Molecular “vitalism.” Cell 100: 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert DM, Hughes AJ (1988) Keywords and concepts in structuralist and functionalist biology. Journal of Theoretical Biology 133: 133–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemons D, McGinnis W (2006) Genomic evolution of Hox gene clusters. Science 313: 1918–1922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir T (1987) The eternal laws of form: Morphotypes and the conditions of existence in Goethe’s biological thought. In: Goethe and the Sciences: A Re-appraisal (Amrine F, Zucker F, Wheeler H, eds), 17–28. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Newman SA (1994) Generic physical mechanisms of tissue morphogenesis: A common basis for development and evolution. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 7: 467–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman SA (2002) Developmental mechanisms: Putting genes in their place. Journal of Biosciences 27: 97–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman SA (2003) From physics to developement: The evolution of morphogenetic mechanisms. In: Origination of Organismal Form (Müller GB, Newman SA, eds), 221–239. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman SA (2010) Stuart A. Newman [interview]. In: Evolutionary Theory: 5 Questions (Oftedal G, Friis JKBO, Roussel P, Norup MS, eds). Copenhagen: Automatic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman SA, Bhat R (2008) Dynamical patterning modules: Physico-genetic determinants of morphological development and evolution. Physical Biology 5: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman SA, Bhat R (2009) Dynamical patterning modules: A “pattern language” for developement and evolution of multicellular form. International Journal of Developmental Biology 53: 693–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman SA, Forgacs G, Müller GB (2006) Before programs: The physical origination of multicellular forms. International Journal of Developmental Biology 50: 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman SA, Müller GB (2000) Epigenetic mechanisms of character origination. Journal of Experimental Zoology B (Molecular Development and Evolution) 288: 304–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijhout HF (1990) Metaphors and the role of genes in development. BioEssays 12: 441–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M (2007) Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis? Evolution 61: 2743–2749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pigliucci M, Müller GB, eds (2010) Evolution: The Extended Synthesis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rádl E (1988) Historia de las teorías biológicas. Madrid, Spain: Alianza Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnik D (1994) The rebirth of rational morphology: Process structuralism’s philosophy of biology. Acta Biotheoretica 42: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert JS (2001) Interpreting the homeobox: Metaphors of gene action and activation in development and evolution. Evolution and Development 3: 287–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert JS (2002) How developmental is evolutionary developmental biology? Biology and Philosophy 17: 591–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert JS (2004) Embryology, Epigenesis and Evolution: Taking Development Seriously. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rokas A, Kruger D, Carroll SB (2005) Animal evolution and the molecular signature of radiations compressed in time. Science 310: 1933–1938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell E (1916) Form and Function. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar-Ciudad I, Solé R, Newman SA (2001) Phenotypic and dynamical transitions in model genetic networks. II. Application to the evolution of segmentation mechanisms. Evolution and Development 3: 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salthe NS (2008) Natural selection in relation with complexity. Artificial Life 14: 363–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sansom R (2008) The nature of developmental constraints and the difference-maker argument for externalism. Biology and Philosophy 24: 441–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith KC (1992) Neo-rationalism versus neo-Darwinism: Integrating development and evolution. Biology and Philosophy 7: 431–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sole R, Goodwin B (2000) Signs of Life: How Complexity Pervades Biology. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterelny K (2000) Development, evolution, and adaptation. Philosophy of Science 67: 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrall M (2007) Speculation and experiment in Enlightenment life sciences. In: Heredity Produced: At the Crossroads of Biology, Politics, and Culture (Mueller-Wille S, Rheinberger H-J, eds), 253–275. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterston R, Lindblad-Toh K, Birney E, Rogers J, Abril J, Agarwal P (2002) Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature 420: 520–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster G, Goodwin B (1982) The origin of species: A structuralist approach. Journal of Social and Biological Structures 5: 15–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert L (1991) The Triumph of the Embryo. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

    Marta Linde Medina

  2. Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA

    Marta Linde Medina

Authors
  1. Marta Linde Medina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Linde Medina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Medina, M.L. Two “EvoDevos”. Biol Theory 5, 7–11 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1162/BIOT_a_00014

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/BIOT_a_00014

Keywords

Search

Navigation