Abstract
Conservation biology is a branch of ecology devoted to conserving biodiversity. Because this discipline is based on the assumption that knowledge should guide actions, it endows experts with a power that should be questioned. The work of the French philosopher Michel Foucault (1926–1984) can be seen as a relevant conceptual resource to think these aspects of conservation biology through. I critically analyse the relevance of the Foucauldian approach to conservation. I argue that Foucauldian arguments are deeply ambiguous, and therefore useless for conservation purposes, unless they are supplemented with unsaid assumptions that are, depending on the case at hand, untenable, or at least at odds with basic assumptions underlying conservation biology. In any case, the prospects of using the Foucauldian approach for conservation purposes are deeply undermined. However, the Foucauldian reasoning contains some ideas that can be important and useful for conservation purposes, if they are duly clarified.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature cited
Agrawal, A. (2005). Environmentality: Technologies of government and the making of subjects. Duke University Press
Baron, M., Pettit, P., & Slote, M. (1997). Three methods of ethics: A debate. Blackwell
Biermann, C., & Mansfield, B. (2014). Biodiversity, purity, and death: Conservation biology as biopolitics. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32(2), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1068/d13047p
Bouveresse, J. (2016). Nietzsche contre Foucault: Sur la vérité, la connaissance et le pouvoir. Agone
Brown, W. (2007). Les habits neufs de la politique mondiale. Amsterdam
Büscher, B., & Fletcher, R. (2019). Towards convivial conservation. Conservation & Society, 17(3), 283–296
Carolan, M. S., & Bell, M. M. (2003). In truth we trust: Discourse, phenomenology, and the social relations of knowledge in an environmental dispute. Environmental Values, 12(2), 225–245
Carpenter, C. (2020). Power in conservation: Environmental anthropology beyond political ecology. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429324659
Courtine, J. F. (1990). Suarez et le système de la métaphysique (1. éd). Presses universitaires de France
Cusset, F. (2008). French theory: How Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, & Co. transformed the intellectual life of the United States. University of Minnesota Press
de Lagasnerie, G. (2012). La dernière leçon de Michel Foucault: Sur le néolibéralisme, la théorie et la politique. Fayard
Dearden, P. (2014).Why local people do not support conservation: Community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand. Marine Policy, 44,107–116
Detienne, M. (1996). The masters of truth in Archaic Greece. MIT Press
Devictor, V., & Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2016). From ecological records to big data: The invention of global biodiversity. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 38(4)
Devictor, V. (2018). La prise en charge technoscientifique de la crise de la biodiversité [Phdthesis]. Université Panthéon-Sorbonne - Paris I
Devictor, V., & Meinard, Y. (2019). Empowering biodiversity knowledge. Conservation Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13367
Djoghlaf, A., Dodds, F. (2011). Biodiversity and ecosystem insecurity. A planet in peril. Routledge
Dreyfus, H., Rabinow, P. Eds. (1983). Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. 2nd Edition. The University of Chicago Press
Fairhead, J., & Leach, M. (1996). Misreading the African landscape: Society and ecology in a forest-savanna mosaic. Cambridge University Press
Falzon, C., O’Leary, T., & Sawicki, J. (2013). A companion to Foucault. Wiley-Blackwell. (Éds.)
Fisher, B., Turner, R. K., & Morling, P. (2009). Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68(3), 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.014
Foucault, M. (1966). Les mots et les choses. Gallimard
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. Pantheon Books
Foucault, M. (1976). Histoire de la folie à l’âge classique. Gallimard
Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon Books
Foucault, M. (1993). L’ordre du discours. Gallimard
Foucault, M. (1994). Histoire de la sexualité, tome 3: HLe souci de soi. Gallimard
Foucault, M. (2003a). Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1974–1975. Picador
Foucault, M. (2003b). Society must be defended: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975-76. Picador
Foucault, M. (2005). The hermeneutics of the subject: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1981-82. Palgrave-Macmillan
Foucault, M. (2006). Psychiatric power: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1973-74. Palgrave Macmillan
Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78. Palgrave Macmillan
Foucault, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978-79. Palgrave Macmillan
Foucault, M. (2011). Leçons sur la volonté de savoir. Gallimard/Seuil
Foucault, M. (2015). The punitive society: Lectures at the Collège de France 1972–1973. Palgrave Macmillan
Foucault, M. (2019). Penal theories and institutions: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1971–1972. Palgrave Macmillan
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. Volume I: An introduction. Pantheon Books
Ferguson, J. (1990). The anti-politics machine: “Development”, depoliticization, and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Cambridge University Press
Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (1st American ed). Pantheon Books
Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In H. Dreyfus, & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics, 2nd ed., (pp. 208–226). University of Chicago
Gibbons, P., & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2007). Offsets for land clearing: No net loss or the tail wagging the dog? Ecological Management & Restoration, 8(1), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-8903.2007.00328.x
Grove, R. (1995). Green imperialism: Colonial expansion, tropical island Edens, and the orgins of environmentalism, 1600–1860. Cambridge University Press
Habermas, J. (1988). Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne: Zwölf Vorlesungen. Suhrkamp Insel
Honneth, A. (1985). Kritik der Macht: Reflexionsstufen einer kritischen Gesellschaftstheorie. Suhrkamp
Jones, D. (2019). Conservation politics | Ecology and conservation. Cambridge University Press
Justus, J., Colyvan, M., Regan, H., & Maguire, L. (2009). Buying into conservation: Intrinsic versus instrumental value. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(4), 187–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2008.11.011
Kiik, L. (2019). Conservationland: Toward the anthropology of professionals in global nature conservation. Critique of Anthropology, 39(4), 391–419. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X18821177
Kopnina, H., & Washington, H. (Eds.). (2020). Conservation. Integrating social and ecological justice. Springer
Lazar, S. (2004). Education for credit: Development as citizenship project in Bolivia. Critique of Anthropology, 24(3), 301–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X04045423
Lelièvre, M., Dehais, C., Jamault, R., Martin, M., Meinard, Y., Stenou, B., & Valladares, L. (2021). Etudes préalables et demande de labellisation en ENS et de classement en Arrêté de Protection de Biotopes de la zone humide « les Rochières—Les Herbages »—Rapport préparé pour le compte du Syndicat Mixte du Bassin de la Sorgue
Li, T. (2007). Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society 36(2): 263–293
Lougheed, S. C., Hird, M. J., & Rowe, K. R. (2016). Governing household waste management: An empirical analysis and critique. Environmental Values, 25(3), 287–308. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327116X14598445991420
Mascia, M. B., Brosius, J. P., Dobson, T. A., Forbes, B. C., Horowitz, L., McKean, M. A., & Turner, N. J. (2003). Conservation and the social sciences. Conservation Biology, 17(3), 649–650. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01738.x
Meinard, Y. (2017). What is a legitimate conservation policy? Biological Conservation, 213(Part A), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.06.042
Putnam, H. (2004). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy and other essays. Harvard University Press
Runte, A. (2010). National parks: The American experience (Fourth edition). Taylor Trade Publishing
Sandbrook, C., Scales, I. R., Vira, B., & Adams, W. M. (2011). Value plurality among conservation professionals. Conservation Biology, 25, 285–294
Soulé, M. E. (1985). What is conservation biology? BioScience, 35(11), 727–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/1310054
Srinivasan, K. (2017). Conservation biopolitics and the sustainability episteme. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 49(7)
Taylan, F. (2014). Gouverner les hommes par leurs milieux. La rationalité mésologique et les technologies environnementales du libéralisme. Chapitre 11 in Oulc’hen, H. (Ed). Usages de Foucault. Presses Universitaires de France
Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Fontana Press
Williams, B. (2002). Truth & truthfulness: An essay in genealogy. Princeton University Press
Youatt, R. (2008). Counting species: Biopower and the global biodiversity census. Environmental Values, 17(3), 393–417
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meinard, Y. The foucauldian approach to conservation: pitfalls and genuine promises. HPLS 44, 25 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-022-00509-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40656-022-00509-8