Skip to main content
Log in

In Defence Of Weak Psychological Egoism

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Weak psychological egoism is the doctrine that anything an agent does intentionally, that agent does at least expecting thereby to realize one of her self-regarding ends. (Strong psychological egoism, by contrast, is the doctrine that agents act always intending thereby to realize a self-regarding end.) Though weak psychological egoism is a doctrine ultimately answerable to empirical evidence, we presently have excellent a priori reasons for accepting it and attempting to construct psychological theories that include it as an organizing principle. These reasons have mainly to do with the idea that to understand the motivation behind an action, we need to understand the force of the consideration that motivates the agent, and the way to do this is to find a self-regarding end associated in the agent's mind with acting on that consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bond, E. J.: 1996, Ethics and Human Well-Being, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad, C.: 1952, ‘Egoism as a Theory of Human Motives’, Ethics and the History of Philosophy, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1970, ‘How is Weakness of the Will Possible?’,Essays on Actions and Events, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1973, ‘RadicalInterpretation’, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D.: 1974, ‘Belief and the Basis of Meaning’, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation,Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. C.: 1984, Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free WillWorth Wanting, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFollette, H.: 1988, ‘The Truth in PsychologicalEgoism’, in Joel Feinberg (ed.), Reason and Responsibility (Seventh Edition), Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J.: 1979, ‘Virtue and Reason’, The Monist 62,331–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, J.: 1995, ‘Might There be External Reasons?’, in J. E. J. Altham and Ross Harrison (eds.), World, Mind, and Ethics: Essays on the Ethical Philosophy of Bernard Williams, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, M.: 1998, ‘Psychological Egoism and Its Critics’,Southern Journal of Philosophy 36(4), 557–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T.: 1986, The View from Nowhere,Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, J.: 1998, The Elements of Moral Philosophy (ThirdEdition), McGraw-Hill College, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slote, M. A.: 1964, ‘An Empirical Basis for PsychologicalEgoism’, Journal of Philosophy 61(18), 530–537.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mercer, M. In Defence Of Weak Psychological Egoism. Erkenntnis 55, 217–237 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012902007138

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012902007138

Keywords

Navigation