Abstract
In 'Composition and Vagueness', I argued, among other things, that the Vagueness Argument for unrestricted composition fails. In 'Vagueness and Arbitrariness: Merricks on Composition', Elizabeth Barnes objects to my argument. This paper replies to Barnes, and also offers further support for the views defended in my original paper.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Merricks, T. (2007). Remarks on vagueness and arbitrariness. Mind, 116(461), 115–119. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzm115
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free