Abstract
Sciences are often regarded as providing the best, or, ideally, exact, knowledge of the world, especially in providing laws of nature. Ilya Prigogine, who was awarded the Nobel Prize for his theory of non-equilibrium chemical processes—this being also an important attempt to bridge the gap between exact and non-exact sciences [mentioned in the Presentation Speech by Professor Stig Claesson (nobelprize.org, The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 1977)]—has had this ideal in mind when trying to formulate a new kind of science. Philosophers of science distinguish theory and reality, examining relations between these two. Nancy Cartwright’s distinction of fundamental and phenomenological laws, Rein Vihalemm’s conception of the peculiarity of the exact sciences, and Ronald Giere’s account of models in science and science as a set of models are deployed in this article to criticise the common view of science and analyse Ilya Prigogine’s view in particular. We will conclude that on a more abstract, philosophical level, Prigogine’s understanding of science doesn’t differ from the common understanding.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cartwright N. (1986) How the laws of physics lie. Oxford University Press, New York
Feynman, R. (1968). Character of physical law. Moscow: Mir (in Russian); first published in English 1965, 1967. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Giere R.N. (1988) Explaining science A cognitive approach. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Giere R.N. (1995) The skeptical perspective: Science without laws of nature. In: Weinert F. (eds) Laws of nature: Essays on the philosophical, scientific and historical dimensions.. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 120–138
Giere, R. N. (2008). An agent-based conception of models and scientific representation. Synthese (in press), from http://www.tc.umn.edu/~giere/ABCMSR-REV.doc.
Prigogine I. (1980) From being to becoming Time and complexity in the physical sciences. San Francisco, W.H. Freeman and Company
Prigogine I. (1997) The end of certainty. Time, chaos and the new laws of nature. The Free Press, New York
Prigogine I., Stengers I. (1984) Order out of chaos. Man’s new dialogue with nature. Bantam Books, New York
Schrödinger E. (1932) Über Indeterminismus in der Physik. Ist die Naturwissenschaft milieubedingt? Zwei Vorträge zur Kritik der naturwissenschaftlichen Erkenntnis. Leipzig, Verlag von Johann Ambrosius Barth
Van Fraassen B. (1991) Quantum mechanics: An empiricist view. Claredon Press, Oxford
Vihalemm, R. (1989). On methodologically identifying chemistry with physics. In Teaduslugu ja nüüdisaeg IV (pp. 30–40) (in Estonian).
Vihalemm R. (1995) The limits of science or its actual beginning? About Ilya Prigogine’s account of science. Akadeemia 7(12): 2527–2540 (in Estonian)
Vihalemm R. (2007a) Whitehead’s metaphysical ontology and Prigogine’s scientific ontology: From a point of view of a theoretical conception of science. Problemos 71: 78–90
Vihalemm R. (2007b) Philosophy of chemistry and the image of science. Foundations of Science 12(3): 223–234
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mets, A., Kuusk, P. The Constructive Realist Account of Science and Its Application to Ilya Prigogine’s Conception of Laws of Nature. Found Sci 14, 239–248 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-008-9157-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-008-9157-4