Skip to main content

Mirror Neurons and Social Cognition: An Expanded Simulationist Framework

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 731 Accesses

Part of the book series: The European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings ((EPSP,volume 1))

Abstract

In this chapter, I critically assess the thesis that the discovery of mirror neurons (MNs) provides empirical support for the simulation theory (ST) of social cognition. This thesis can be analyzed into two claims:

(i) MNs are involved in understanding others’ intentions or emotions.

(ii) The way in which they do so supports a simulationist viewpoint.

I will be giving qualified support to both (i) and (ii). Starting with (i), I will present theoretical and empirical points in support of the view that MNs play a substantial role and are perhaps necessary although not sufficient for understanding at least some intentions or emotions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adolphs, R. 2003. Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour. National Review of Neuroscience 4(3): 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adolphs, R., F. Gosselin, T.W. Buchanan, D. Tranel, P. Schyns, and A.R. Damasio. 2005. A mechanism for impaired fear recognition after amygdala damage. Nature 433: 68–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. 1995. Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, Lawrence. 1999. Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22: 577–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, Lawrence. 2009. Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London: Biological Sciences 364: 1281–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsalou, Lawrence, W. Kyle Simmons, Aron Barbey, and Christine Wilson. 2003. Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(2): 84–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastiaansen, J.A.C.J., M. Thioux, and C. Keysers. 2009. Evidence for mirror systems in emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 364: 2391–2404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buccino G., F. Binkofski, G.R. Fink, L. Fadiga, L. Fogassi, V. Gallese, R.J. Seits, K. Zilles, G. Rizzolatti, and H.-J. Freund. 2001. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. European Journal of Neuroscience 13: 400–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, P. 2009. How we know our minds: The relationship between metacognition and mindreading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32: 121–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelli, F., C. Frith, F. Happé, and U. Frith. 2002. Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain 125(8): 1839–1849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csibra, G. 2008. Action mirroring and action understanding: An alternative account. In Sensorimotor foundation of higher cognition: Attention and performance, eds. P. Haggard, Y. Rossetti, and M. Kawato, 435–458. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, C., and T. Singer. 2008. The role of social cognition in decision-making. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363: 3875–3886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese V., and A. Goldman. 1998. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2: 493–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V., C. Keysers, and G. Rozzolatti. 2004. A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(9): 396–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. 1993. The psychology of folk psychology. In Readings in philosophy and cognitive science, ed. A. Goldman, 347–380. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. 2006. Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. 2008. Mirroring, mindreading and simulation. In Mirror neuron system: The role of mirroring processes in social cognition, ed. J.A. Pineda, 311–330. New York: Humana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A. 1993. The illusion first-person knowledge of intentionality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. 1995. Simulation without introspection or inference from me to you. In Mental Simulation: Evaluations and applications, eds. T. Stone and M. Davies, 53–67. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. 2007. Ascent routines for propositional attitudes. Synthese 159: 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heal, J. 1986. Replication and functionalism. In Language, mind and logic, ed. J. Butterfield, 135–150. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heiser, M., M. Iacoboni, F. Maeda, J. Markus, and J. Maziotta. 2003. The essential role of Broca’s area in imitation. European Journal of Neuroscience 17: 1123–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M., I. Molnar-Szakacs, V. Gallese, G. Buccino, J.C. Mazziotta, and G. Rizzolatti. 2005. Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology 3: 529–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, P. 2008. What do mirror neurons contribute to human social cognition? Mind and Language 23(2): 190–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, P. 2009. The tuning-fork model of human social cognition: A critique. Consciousness and Cognition 18(1): 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Frey, S.H. 2004. The neural basis of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8: 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keysers, C., B. Wicker, V. Gazzola, J.L. Anton, L. Fogassi, and V. Gallese. 2004. A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron 42: 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A. 2000. Theory of mind as a mechanism of selective attention. In The new cognitive neurosciences, ed. M. Gazzaniga, 1235–1247. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, B.Z., A. Caramazza. 2005. The orchestration of the sensory-motor systems: clues from neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22(2/3): 480–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukamel, R., A.D. Ekstrom, J. Kaplan, M. Iacoboni, and I. Fried. 2010. Current Biology 20: 750–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman-Norlund, R., H. van Shie, A. van Zuijlen, and H. Beckering. 2007. The mirror system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nature Neuroscience 10(7): 817–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberman L., P. Winkielman, and V.S. Ramachandran. 2007: Face to face: Blocking facial mimicry can selectively impair recognition of impair emotional expressions. Social Neuroscience, 2(3–4): 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pobric, G., and A. Hamilton. 2006. Action understanding requires the left inferior frontal cortex. Current Biology 16: 524–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, Jesse. 2002. Furnishing the mind: Concepts and their perceptual basis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., and L. Craighero. 2004. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience 27: 169–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothi, L.J.G., C. Ochipa, and K.M. Heilman. 1991. A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis. Cognitive Neuropsychology 8: 443–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, T., B. Seymour, J. O’Doherty, H. Kaube, R.J Dolan, and C. Frith. 2004: Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303: 1157–1162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, B., C. Keysers, J. Plailly, J. Royet, V. Gallese, and G. Rizzolatti. 2003. Both of us disgusted in my insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron 40: 655–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, D.M. 1997. Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1: 209–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, D.M., K. Doya, and M. Kawato. 2003. A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London B 358: 593–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Michael .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Michael, J. (2012). Mirror Neurons and Social Cognition: An Expanded Simulationist Framework. In: de Regt, H., Hartmann, S., Okasha, S. (eds) EPSA Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. The European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2404-4_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics