Skip to main content
Log in

On The Impossibility Of Empirical Controls Of Scientific Theories – From The Point Of View Of A Psychologist

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Standard considerations of philosophy of science are reformulated in psychological terms and arguments, suggesting a fundamental change in life perspective: subjective experiences or introspective data are subject to motivational biases and therefore not admitted as objective empirical facts in science, However, we never experience objects or events of the external world, i.e., so called objective facts, but exclusively subjective percepts or mental events. They are merely assumed to, but may or may not be accurate or distorted mental representations of objects or events of an external world. Accordingly, the latter are theoretical constructs, i.e., constructs of the fictitious but most successful predictive (implicit) theory, called “external world”, which seems to be constructed from regularities observed in mental events and serves as a reference fiction for, erroneously called empirical, tests of predictions of scientific theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • L. Festinger (1962) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance Leon Stanford University Press Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hejl, P.M. and S.J. Schmidt: 1997, Bibliographie (Bibliography). In H. von Foerster, E. von Glasersfeld, P.M. Heijl, S.J. Schmidt and P. Watzlawick (eds.), Einführung in den Konstruktivismus (Introduction to Constructivism),3rd ed. München: Piper. Kolakowki, L.: 1972, Positivist Philosophy. Hammondsworth: Penguin Books.

  • Piaget, J.: 1957, Programmes et methodes de l′ épistémologie génétique. In W.E. Beth, W. Bays and J. Piaget (eds.), Èpistémologie et recherche psychologique. Etudes d′ epistémologie génétique. Paris: Presses universitäires de France, vol. 1, 1–37.

  • S.J. Schmidt (2000) No Beyond of Discourse. On a Constructivist Reading of Empirical Neohelicon, Communications of the Hungarian Academy of Science Budapest

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Christoph Micko.

Additional information

Relevant Publication: Micko, H.C.: 2001, Psychologie: Von der Geistes – zur Naturwissenschaft – und weiter wohin? Erkenntnistheoretische Erwägungen vor und nach dem Aufkommen des philosophischen Konstruktivismus. Ztschr. f. Psychologie, 209: 54–68.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Micko, H.C. On The Impossibility Of Empirical Controls Of Scientific Theories – From The Point Of View Of A Psychologist. Found Sci 9, 405–413 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-004-3062-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-004-3062-2

Keywords

Navigation