Abstract
The thesis that, in a system of natural deduction, the meaning of a logical constant is given by some or all of its introduction and elimination rules has been developed recently in the work of Dummett, Prawitz, Tennant, and others, by the addition of harmony constraints. Introduction and elimination rules for a logical constant must be in harmony. By deploying harmony constraints, these authors have arrived at logics no stronger than intuitionist propositional logic. Classical logic, they maintain, cannot be justified from this proof-theoretic perspective. This paper argues that, while classical logic can be formulated so as to satisfy a number of harmony constraints, the meanings of the standard logical constants cannot all be given by their introduction and/or elimination rules; negation, in particular, comes under close scrutiny.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Belnap, N.: 1962, ‘Tonk, Plonk and Plink’,Analysis 22, 130–34. Reprinted in P. Strawson (ed.),Philosophical Logic, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 132–37.
Coburn, B. and D. Miller: 1977, ‘Two Comments on Lemmon'sBeginning Logic’,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic XVIII, 607–10.
Denyer, N.: 1989, ‘The Principle of Harmony’,Analysis 49, 21–22.
Dummett, M.: 1977,Elements of Intuitionism, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Dummett, M.: 1987a, ‘Reply to Loar’, in B. Taylor (ed.),Michael Dummett: Contributions to Philosophy, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 269–80.
Dummett, M.: 1987b, ‘Reply to Wright’, in B. Taylor (ed.),Michael Dummett: Contributions to Philosophy, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp. 221–34.
Dummett, M.: 1991,The Logical Basis of Metaphysics, Duckworth, London.
Egli, U.: 1983, ‘The Stoic Theory of Argument’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.),Meaning, Use, and Interpretation, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 79–96.
Engel, P.: 1991,The Norm of Truth, Harvester, Hemel Hempstead.
Lemmon, E. J.: 1965,Beginning Logic, Nelson, London.
Luntley, M.: 1988,Language, Logic and Experience, Open Court, La Salle.
Milne, P.: 1991, ‘Verification, Falsification, and the Logic of Enquiry’,Erkenntnis 34, 23–54.
Mueller, I.: 1979, ‘The Completeness of Stoic Propositional Logic’,Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic XX, 201–15.
Potter, M.: 1990,Sets: An Introduction, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Prawitz, D.: 1975, ‘Ideas and Results in Proof Theory’, in J. Fenstad (ed.),Proceedings of the Second Scandinavian Logic Symposium, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 235–50.
Prawitz, D.: 1977, ‘Meaning and Proofs: On the Conflict between Classical and Intuitionist Logic’,Theoria 43, 2–40.
Prawitz, D.: 1979, ‘Proofs and the Meaning and Completeness of the Logical Constants’, in J. Hintikka, I. Niiniluoto and E. Saarinen (eds.),Essays on Mathematical and Philosophical Logic, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 25–40.
Prior, A. N.: 1960, ‘The Runabout Inference-Ticket’,Analysis 21, 38–9. Reprinted in P. Strawson (ed.),Philosophical Logic, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 129–31.
Read, S.: 1988,Relevant Logic, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Schroeder-Heister, P.: 1985, ‘Proof-theoretic Validity and the Completeness of Intuitionist Logic’, in G. Dorn and P. Weingartner (eds.),Foundations of Logic and Linguistics, Plenum, New York, pp. 43–87.
Sundholm, G.: 1986, ‘Proof Theory and Meaning’, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.),Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. III, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 471–506.
Tennant, N.: 1978,Natural Logic, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Tennant, N.: 1987,Anti-realism and Logic, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Tichý, P.: 1988,The Foundations of Frege's Logic, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin.
Williamson, T.: 1988, ‘Equivocation and Existence’,Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society LXXXVII, 109–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Milne, P. Classical harmony: Rules of inference and the meaning of the logical constants. Synthese 100, 49–94 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063921
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01063921