Abstract
Despite the importance of the co-evolution approach in various branches of research, such as strategy, organisation theory, complexity, population ecology, technology and innovation (Lewin et al., 1999; March, 1991), co-evolution has been relatively neglected in international business and ethics research (Madhok and Phene, 2001). The purpose of this article is to show how co-evolution theory provides a theoretical framework within which some issues of ethics research are addressed. Our analysis is in the context of the contrasts between business systems (North, 1990), and in particular the distinction between informal systems and those systems where institutions are formalised in law. This complements the growing research on comparative corporate governance and capitalisms (Chandler and Hikino, 1990; Choi et al., 1999; Whitley, 1994). The synthesis of co-evolution and analysis of divergent institutional environments in ethics research can also complement the globalisation and MNE approaches to international business research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, P. 1999. Complexity theory and organization science. Organization Science, 10: 216–232
Arce, D. G. 2004. Conspicuous by its absence: ethics and managerial economics. Journal of Business Ethics, 54: 261–277
Butcher, D & M. Clarke. 2006. Political leadership in democracies: some lessons for business? Management Decision, 44 (8): 985–1001
Calori, R., M. Lubatkin, P. Very & J.F. Veiga. 1997. Modelling the origins of nationally bound administrative heritages: a historical institutional analysis of French and British firms. Organization Science, 8: 681–696
Casson, M. 1996. Economics and anthropology - reluctant partners. Human Relations, 49: 1151–1181
Chandler, A.D. & T. Hikino. 1990. Scale and scope: the dynamics of industrial capitalism. Belknap Press, Cambridge MA
Choi, C. J.: 1992, Asian Capitalism Versus Western Civilization (Oxford University, Mimeo)
Choi, C.J., S.H. Lee, J.B. Kim. 1999. Countertrade: Contractual uncertainty and transaction governance in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies, 30: 189–202
Choi, C J., B.J. Hilton & C.C.J.M. Millar, 2004. Emergent Globalisation. London, PalgraveMacmillan
Dijksterhuis, M.S., F.A.J. van den Bosch & H.W. Volberda, 1999. Where do new organizational forms come from? Management logics as a source of co-evolution. Organization Science, 10 (5): 569–582
Etzioni, A. 1988. The moral dimension: toward a new economics. The Free Press, New York
Flier, B, F.A.J. van den Bosch & H.W. Volberda, 2003, Co-evolution in strategic renewal behaviour of British, Dutch and French financial incumbents: interaction of environmental selection, institutional effects and managerial intentionality. Journal of Management Studies, 40: 2163–2187
Graetz, F. & A. smith, 2006, Critical Perspectives on the evolution of new forms of organising. International Journal of Strategic Change Management, 1 (1/2): 127–142
Grant, R.M. 1996. Knowledge, strategy and the theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17: 109–122
Juma, C.: 2005, ‹Biotechnology in a Globalizing World: The Coevolution of Technology and Social Institutions’, BioScience 55(3), 265–272
Laaksonen, T., K. Pajunen and H. I. Kulmala: 2007, ‹ Co-Evolution of Trust and Dependence in Customer-Supplier Relationships’, Industrial Marketing Management (in press)
Langlois, R. 1992. Transaction-cost economics in Real time. Industrial and Corporate Change, 1: 99–127
Lewin, A.Y., Long, C. & Carroll, T. 1999. The Coevolution of new organizational forms. Organization Science, 10: 535–550
Lewin, A.Y., & Volberda, H. 1999. Prolegomena on coevolution: a framework for Research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organization Science, 10: 519–534
Madhok, A. & A. Phene. 2001. The Co-Evolutional advantage: Strategic Management theory and the eclectic paradigm. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 8: 243–256
March, J.G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2: 71–87
Mattei, U., 1994. Efficiency in Legal Transplants: An Essay in Comparative Law and Economics. International Review of Law & Economics, 14 (1): 3–17
Merry, U.: 1999, ‹Organizational Strategy on Different Landscapes: A New Science Approach’, Systemic Practice and Action Research 12(3), 257–278
Millar, Carla C. J. M.: 2007, Eve’s Apple has Many Skins: The Human Core of Innovation and Knowledge Transfer (Twente University Press, Enschede)
Molz, R. & X. Wang. 2006. Chinese guanxi as network building: the emergence of the new institutional environment in China. Global Business and Economic Review, 8 (1/2): 44–59
Murmann, J.P. 2003. Knowledge and Competitive Advantage: The Coevolution of Firms, Technology, and National Institutions. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
Nelson, R. R. 1995. Recent Evolutionary Theorizing About Economic Change, Journal of Economic Literature 33 (1): 48–90
North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Olson, M. 1965. The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Olson, M. 1982. The rise and decline of nations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
Olson, M. 1992. The hidden path to a successful economy, in Clague, C. & G. Rausser, (eds.), The emergence of market economies in Eastern Europe. London: Blackwell publishers
Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the common: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press
Peltoniemi, M. J.: 2005, Co-Evolution in an Organization Population of Which Knowledge-Intensive Service Organizations Form a Part. Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Conference on Services Systems
Peltoniemi, M. E.: 2005, Co-Evolution in an Organization Population of Which Knowledge-Intensive Service Organizations Form a Part. Proceedings of ICSSSM `05. International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management
Porter, T.B. 2006. Co-evolution as a research framework for organizations and the natural environment. 2006. Organization Environment, 19: 479–504
Rodrik, D.: 1997, Has Globalization Gone Too Far (Institute of International Economies, Washington, DC)
Sarasvathy, S.D. 2001. Entrepreneurship as economics with imagination. Business Ethics Quarterly, 3: 95–112
Simon, H. 1991. Organisations and markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 25–44
Smith, A & F. Graetz, 2006. Organizing dualities and strategizing for change. Strategic Change, 15: 231–239
Spicer, A.: 2004, ‹Co-Evolution of States and Markets: Banks and Bankers in Yeltsin’s Russia’, in J. Padgett and W. Powell (eds.), Market Emergence and Transformation (MIT Press, Cambridge)
Whitley, R. 1994. Dominant forms of economic organization in market economies. Organization Studies, 15: 543–555
Witt, P.: 2004, ‹The Competition of International Corporate Governance Systems – A German Perspective’, Managment International Review 44, 309–333
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Millar, C.C.J.M., Choi, CJ. & Cheng, P.Y.K. Co-Evolution: Law and Institutions in International Ethics Research. J Bus Ethics 87, 455–462 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9952-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9952-4