Abstract
A critique is made of Bernard Rollin's examination of the ethics of cloning adult mammalian cells. The primary concern is less to propound an anticloning or procloning position than to call for full exploration of the ethical complexities before a rush to judgment is made. Indeed, the ethical examination in question rushes toward an ethical position in such a way that does not appear consistent with Rollin's usual methodology. By extending this methodology – which entails full weighing of benefits and costs – it becomes apparent that there are real potential risks to this type of cloning in both animals and humans, besides the possible benefits, and that the scientific, political, philosophical, and broader academic communities should explore these risks and benefits extensively. Rollin's usual methodological call for hesitation before risks would translate into hesitation before the ethical risks of adult mammalian cell cloning instead of his paper's curiously laissez-faire stance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Anees, M. A., “Human Cloning: An Atlantean Odyssey?,” Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 5 (1995), 36–37.
Cherlin, A. J., Marriage, Divorce, Remarriage (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1981).
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Final Uniform Crime Report (1994).
Gaard, G. (ed.), Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1993).
Krauthammer, C., “A Special Report on Cloning: Introduction,” Time 149(10) (1997), 59–61.
Krauthammer, C., “On Headless Mice... and Men,” 151(2) (1998), 76.
Mander, J. and E. Goldsmith, The Case Against the Global Economy and for a Turn Toward the Local (San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books, 1996).
Minotti-Raymond, M. and S. J. O'Brien, “Dating the Genetic Bottleneck of the African Cheetah,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 89(8) (1993), 3172.
Money, J., “Gender Coding,” Balcones 1(3) (1987), 5–27.
Reilly, P. R., “The Nuremberg Code,” The Gene Letter 1(4) (1997).
Rollin, B. E., The Unheeded Cry: Animal Consciousness, Animal Pain, and Science (Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1990).
Rollin, B. E., The Frankenstein Syndrome: Ethical and Social Issues in the Genetic Engineering of Animals (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994).
Rollin, B. E., “Send in the Clones... Don't Bother, They're Here,” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics (1997).
Sale, K., “Ban Cloning? Not a Chance,” The New York Times (Friday, March 7) 146(50,724).
Schultz, R., “Will Dolly Send in the Clones?,” Science 275 (1997), 1415.
Sikora, R. I., “Is it Wrong To Prevent the Existence of Future Generations,” in R. I. Sikora and B. Barry (eds.), Obligations to Future Generations (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1978).
Specter, M. and G. Kolata, “After Decades of Missteps, How Cloning Succeeded,” New York Times (Monday, March 3, 1997) 146(50,720).
Tizard, Ian R., Veterinary Immunology: An Introduction (Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 1997).
U.S. Bureau of the Census, Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970, Vol. 1 (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1975).
Voice of America, The Implications of Cloning (transcript). February 28, 1997a.
Voice of America, The Ethics of Cloning (transcript). March 13, 1997b.
Wertz, D. C., “Human Cloning: Is It Ethical?,” The Gene Letter 1(5) (1997).
Wilmut, I., A. E. Schnieke, J. McWhir et al., “Viable Offspring Derived from Fetal and Adult Mammalian Cells,” Nature 385(6619) (1997), 810–813.
Wilson E. O., On Human Nature (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, L. Filling the Gaps in the Risks vs. Benefits of Mammalian Adult-Cell Cloning: Taking Bernard Rollin's Philosophy Its Next Step. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11, 1–16 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007761031092
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007761031092