Skip to main content
Log in

Lifesizing in an Era of Downsizing: An Ethical Quandary

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corporate executives, at the behest of Wall Street, have embraced the heresy of upsizing short-term shareholder profits by downsizing the long-term work force. This restructuring of corporate America, which views the corporation as an investment organization rather than a social organization, has created an ethical quandary by removing from the equation a sense of larger-purpose. This paper proposes a new paradigm, LIFESIZING, to address the issues raised by this ethical quandary. The paper will explore the effect the creation of fictitious personhood (Corporations, Government, Wall Street, Unions, etc.) has had on the concept of personal responsibility and common good when responsible individuals are but transient members of such a legal entity. It will briefly recap the history of downsizing, the practice of treating workers as an expense rather than a capital asset, stakeholder theory, and the rise of a "me-first" culture. It will then define and apply LIFESIZING to both the individual and the corporation in an attempt to provide a sense of balance missing from current discourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahams: 1996 (May 30), ‘Life After Downsizing’, Marketing, 26–27.

  • Baker, R: 1996 (March 23), ‘The Market God’, The New York Times, p. 21.

  • Bartlett, C. A. and S. Ghoshal: 1994 (Nov-Dec), ‘Changing the Role of Top Management: Beyond Strategy to Purpose’, Harvard Business Review, 79–88.

  • Bartlett, C. A. and S. Ghoshal: 1995a (May-June), ‘Changing the Role of Top Management: Beyond Systems to People’, Harvard Business Review, 132–142.

  • Bartlett, C. A. and S. Ghoshal: 1995b (Fall), ‘Rebuilding Behavioral Context: Turn Process Reengineering into People Rejuvenation’, Sloan Management Review, 11–23.

  • Beaver, W.: 1995, ‘Corporations' Misguided Obsession with Shareholder Wealth’, Business and Society Review 95, 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S.: 1993, ‘Nobel Lecture: The Economic Way of Looking at Behavior’, Journal of Political Economy 101(3), 385–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, M. J.: 1994, ‘Incentives, Rationality, and Society’, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 7(2), 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T.: 1996 ( June), ‘Business Boards the “Soul Train”’, American Management Association, 6–7

  • Carr, A. Z.: 1989, ‘Can an Executive Afford a Conscience’, in K. Andrews (ed.), Ethics in Practice 32.

  • Covey, S. R.: 1989, The Seven Habits of Highly Effective People: Restoring the Character Ethic(Simon and Schuster, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chilton, K. and M. Orlando: 1996: ‘A New Social Contract for the American Worker’, Business and Society Review 96, 23–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMarco, T.: 1996 (April 14), ‘Viewpoint: Human Capital, Unmasked’, The New York Times, F13.

  • Donaldson, T. and L. E. Preston: 1995, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagiano, D.: 1996 ( June), ‘The Legacy of Downsizing’, Management Review, 5.

  • Ghoshal, S. and C. A. Bartlett: 1995, ‘Changing the Role of Top Management: Beyond Structure to Process’, Harvard Business Review 73(1), 86–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghoshal, S. and C. A. Bartlett: 1996 (Winter), ‘Rebuilding Behavioral Context: A Blueprint for Corporate Renewal’, Sloan Management Review, 23–35.

  • Goodpaster, K. E. and J. B. Matthews, Jr.: 1989. ‘Can a Corporation Have a Conscience’, in K. Andrews (ed.), Ethics in Practice 160.

  • Goodpaster, K. E.: 1994: ‘Work, Spirituality and the Moral Point of View’, International Journal of Valuebased Management 7(1), 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, R. C.: 199X ( June 8), ‘A Catholic Alternative to Downsizing’, America, 18–20.

  • Leana, C. R.: 1996 (April 14), ‘Why Downsizing Won't Work’, Chicago Tribune Magazine, 15–18.

  • Longworth, R. C.: 1996 (April 28), ‘The Dream in Pieces’, Chicago Tribune Magazine, 14–20.

  • Maner, J.: 1992 (Spring), ‘The Myth of the Corporate Conscience’, Business and Society Review.

  • Maurer, J.: 1996 (April 16), ‘Corporate Restructuring in America’, Vital Speeches of the Day, 505–508.

  • Nesteruk, J.: 1991, ‘Legal Persons and Moral Worlds: Ethical Choices within the Corporate Environment’, American Business Law Journal 29(1), 5–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primeaux, P. and J. Stieber: 1994, ‘Profit Maximization: The Ethical Mandate of Business’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 287–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R.: 1996 ( Jan 4), ‘How To Avoid These Layoffs?’, The New York Times, A21.

  • Reich, R.: 1996 ( Jul-Aug), ‘Has Downsizing Gone Too Far?’, Challenge, 4–10.

  • Samuelson, R.: 1996 (Feb 12), ‘Are Workers Disposable?’, Newsweek, 47.

  • Sandel, M. J.: 1996: Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of a Public(Harvard University Press).

  • Stamps, D.: 1996 (Feb), ‘Corporate Anorexia’, Training, 24–30.

  • Uchitelle, L. and Kleinfield, N. R.: 1996 (Mar 3), ‘On the Battlefield of Business, Millions of Casualties’, The New York Times, A1ff.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, R.A. Lifesizing in an Era of Downsizing: An Ethical Quandary. Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1693–1700 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006036022665

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006036022665

Keywords

Navigation