Skip to main content
Log in

Opportunity, opportunism, and progress:Kairos in the rhetoric of technology

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the principle of timing or opportunity,kairos serves both as a powerful theme within technological discourse and as an analytical concept that explains some of the suasory force by which such discourse maintains itself and its position in our culture. This essay makes a case for a rhetoric of technology that is distinct from the rhetoric of science and illustrates the value of the classical vocabulary for understanding contemporary rhetoric. This case is made by examining images and models of technological change that underlie and justify the thematizations ofkairos that appear in so much technological discourse and by exploring the phenomenon of “technological forecasting,” in which the characterization and construction of moments in the present are crucial to the projection of the future. One example of forecasting is examined in detail: the Japanese “Fifth Generation” computer project, which illustrates the twin themes of opportunity and threat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, Henry: 1918,The Education of Henry Adams, New York, Random House, 1931.

  • Anonymous: 1983a (4 July), ‘The Race to Build a Supercomputer,’Newsweek 102, 58–64.

  • Anonymous: 1983b (Nov.), ‘Next Generation: Tomorrow's Computers,’IEEE Spectrum 2, Special Issue, 34–120.

  • Anonymous: 1987 (June), ‘Next-Generation Race Bogs Down,’IEEE Spectrum 24, 28–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, Robert U.: 1968, ‘Envelope Curve Forecasting,’ in Bright (ed.), pp. 77–94.

  • Ayres, Robert U.: 1990, ‘Technological Transformations and Long Waves,’Technological Forecasting and Social Change 37 (Part I), 1–37; (Part II), 111–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Daniel: 1989 (Spring), ‘The Third Technological Revolution and Its Possible Socioeconomic Consequences,’Dissent 36, 164–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitzer, Lloyd: 1968, ‘The Rhetorical Situation,’Philosophy and Rhetoric 1, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, James R.: 1963 (Nov.-Dec.), ‘Opportunity and Threat in Technological Change,’Harvard Business Review 41, 76–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bright, James R. (ed.): 1968,Technological Forecasting for Industry and Government: Methods and Applications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetron, Marvin J.: 1976 (Sept.), ‘Forecasting Technology,’International Science and Technology 69, 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cetron, Marvin J. and D. N. Dick: 1969, ‘Producing the First Navy Technological Forecast,’Technological Forecasting 1, 185–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, Giovanni: 1982, ‘Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories,’Research Policy 11, 147–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, John: 1988 (1 March), ‘The Fifth-Generation Fallacy: Why Japan Is Betting Its Future on Artificial Intelligence,’PC Week 5, 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, Jacques: 1954,The Technological Society, Trans. John Wilkinson, New York, Knopf, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellul, Jacques: 1977,The Technological System, Trans. Joachim Neugroschel, New York, Continuum, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, Edward A. and Pamela McCorduck: 1983,The Fifth Generation: Artificial Intelligence and Japan's Computer Challenge to the World, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foden, Harry G.: 1989 (Spring), ‘Technological Trends and Economic Development,’Economic Development Review 7, 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabor, Dennis: 1969, ‘Normative Technological Forecasting,’Technological Forecasting 1, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, Alan: 1990,The Rhetoric of Science, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, Hornell: 1946, ‘Technological Acceleration and the Atomic Bomb,’American Sociological Review 11, 277–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmer, Olaf and Nicholas Rescher: 1959 (Oct.), ‘On the Epistemology of the Inexact Sciences,’Management Science 6, 25–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenson, Raymond S.: 1966 (Oct.), ‘Technological Forecasting in Perspective,’Management Science 13, B-70–B-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch, Erich: 1967 (Oct.), ‘Forecasting the Future,’Science Journal 3, 40–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, R.D.: 1972, ‘The Internal Structure of Technology,’The Sociology of Science, Sociological Review Monograph 18, (ed.), Paul Halmos, Keele, Staffordshire, University of Keele, 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerferd, G. B.: 1981,The Sophistic Movement, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, David M.: 1969 (11 Aug.), ‘The Futures Business,’Chemical and Engineering News 47, 62–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layton, Edwin T., Jr.: 1974, ‘Technology as Knowledge,’Technology and Culture 15, 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehner, Urban C.: 1981 (25 Sept.), ‘Japan Starting 10-Year Effort to Create Exotic Computer,’Wall Street Journal 198, 35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenz, Ralph C.: 1968, ‘Forecasts of Exploding Technologies by Trend Extrapolation,’ in Bright (ed.), 57–76.

  • Lessing, Lawrence: 1967 (Jan.), ‘Where the Industries of the Seventies Will Come From,’Fortune 75, pp. 96–98 and 192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovewell, P. J. and R. D. Bruce: 1963 (15 Feb.), ‘How We Predict Technological Change,’New Scientist 13, 370–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino, Joseph P.: 1972a, ‘Preface’ to Martino (ed.),An Introduction to Technological Forecasting, London, Gordon and Breach, vii-viii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martino, Joseph P.: 1972b, ‘Forecasting the Progress of Technology,’ in Martino (ed.), 13–23.

  • Martino, Joseph P.: 1987, ‘Using Precursors as Leading Indicators of Technological Change,’Technological Forecasting and Social Change 32, 341–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Carolyn R.: 1992, ‘Kairos in the Rhetoric of Science,’ in Steven P. Witte, Neil Nakadate, and Roger Cherry (eds.),A Rhetoric of Doing: Essays Honoring James L. Kinneavy, Southern Illinois University Press, 310–327.

  • Nelson, Richard R. and Sidney G. Winter: 1977, ‘In Search of Useful Theory of Innovation,’Research Policy 6, 36–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onians, Richard Broxton: 1951,The Origins of European Thought about the Body, the Mind, the Soul, the World, Time, and Fate, New York, Arno, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacey, Arnold: 1983,The Culture of Technology, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Alan L., A. Thomas Roper, Thomas W. Mason, Frederick A. Rossini, Jerry Banks, and Bradley J. Wiederholt: 1991,Forecasting and Management of Technology, New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prelli, Lawrence J.: 1989,A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse, Columbia, SC, University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Derek J. de S.: 1969, ‘The Structures of Publication in Science and Technology,’ in William H. Gruber and Donald G. Marquis (eds.),Factors in the Transfer of Technology, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Derek J. de S.: 1986,Little Science, Big Science ... and Beyond, Columbia University Press.

  • Poulakos, John: 1983, ‘Toward a Sophistic Definition of Rhetoric,’Philosophy and Rhetoric 16, 35–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, James Bryan: 1967, ‘Technological Forecasting,’Harvard Business Review 45, 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher, Nicholas: 1978,Scientific Progress: A Philosophical Essay on the Economics of Research in Natural Science, Pittsburgh, PA, University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, Don (Republican Congressman from Pennsylvania): 1989 (7, March), Hearings before the Subcommittee on Science, Research and Technology of the Committee on Space, Science, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, 101st Congress, No. 16.

  • Sanders, Ralph: 1987, ‘Penetrating the Fog of Technology's Social Dimensions,’Technology in Society 9, 163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolimowski, Henryk: 1966, ‘The Structure of Thinking in Technology,’Technology and Culture 7, 371–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Herbert: 1857, ‘Progress: Its Law and Cause’; rpt.Essays: Scientific, Political, and Speculative, Vol. 1. 1891; rpt.Works, Vol. 13, Osnabruck: Otto Zeller, 1966, 8–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swager, William L.: 1966 (July), ‘Technological Forecasting for Practical Planning,’Petroleum Management 38, 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Untersteiner, Mario: 1954,The Sophists, Trans. Kathleen Freeman, Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatz, Richard E.: 1973, ‘The Myth of the Rhetorical Situation,’Philosophy and Rhetoric 6, 154–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vincenti, Walter G.: 1990,What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, Susan and Michael Cross: 1988 (3 Dec.), ‘Japan's Fifth-Generation Failure,’New Scientist 120, 25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, Langdon: 1977,Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought, Cambridge MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, Robert Chapman: 1988, ‘The Real Challenge of Japan's Fifth Generation Project,’Technology Review 91, 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasaki, Edward K.: 1982 (Jan.), ‘Tokyo Looks to the 90s,Datamation 28(1), 110–115.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Miller, C.R. Opportunity, opportunism, and progress:Kairos in the rhetoric of technology. Argumentation 8, 81–96 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00710705

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00710705

Key words

Navigation