Abstract
As the principle of timing or opportunity,kairos serves both as a powerful theme within technological discourse and as an analytical concept that explains some of the suasory force by which such discourse maintains itself and its position in our culture. This essay makes a case for a rhetoric of technology that is distinct from the rhetoric of science and illustrates the value of the classical vocabulary for understanding contemporary rhetoric. This case is made by examining images and models of technological change that underlie and justify the thematizations ofkairos that appear in so much technological discourse and by exploring the phenomenon of “technological forecasting,” in which the characterization and construction of moments in the present are crucial to the projection of the future. One example of forecasting is examined in detail: the Japanese “Fifth Generation” computer project, which illustrates the twin themes of opportunity and threat.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, Henry: 1918,The Education of Henry Adams, New York, Random House, 1931.
Anonymous: 1983a (4 July), ‘The Race to Build a Supercomputer,’Newsweek 102, 58–64.
Anonymous: 1983b (Nov.), ‘Next Generation: Tomorrow's Computers,’IEEE Spectrum 2, Special Issue, 34–120.
Anonymous: 1987 (June), ‘Next-Generation Race Bogs Down,’IEEE Spectrum 24, 28–33.
Ayres, Robert U.: 1968, ‘Envelope Curve Forecasting,’ in Bright (ed.), pp. 77–94.
Ayres, Robert U.: 1990, ‘Technological Transformations and Long Waves,’Technological Forecasting and Social Change 37 (Part I), 1–37; (Part II), 111–137.
Bell, Daniel: 1989 (Spring), ‘The Third Technological Revolution and Its Possible Socioeconomic Consequences,’Dissent 36, 164–176.
Bitzer, Lloyd: 1968, ‘The Rhetorical Situation,’Philosophy and Rhetoric 1, 1–14.
Bright, James R.: 1963 (Nov.-Dec.), ‘Opportunity and Threat in Technological Change,’Harvard Business Review 41, 76–86.
Bright, James R. (ed.): 1968,Technological Forecasting for Industry and Government: Methods and Applications, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice-Hall.
Cetron, Marvin J.: 1976 (Sept.), ‘Forecasting Technology,’International Science and Technology 69, 83–92.
Cetron, Marvin J. and D. N. Dick: 1969, ‘Producing the First Navy Technological Forecast,’Technological Forecasting 1, 185–195.
Dosi, Giovanni: 1982, ‘Technological Paradigms and Technological Trajectories,’Research Policy 11, 147–162.
Edwards, John: 1988 (1 March), ‘The Fifth-Generation Fallacy: Why Japan Is Betting Its Future on Artificial Intelligence,’PC Week 5, 81.
Ellul, Jacques: 1954,The Technological Society, Trans. John Wilkinson, New York, Knopf, 1964.
Ellul, Jacques: 1977,The Technological System, Trans. Joachim Neugroschel, New York, Continuum, 1980.
Feigenbaum, Edward A. and Pamela McCorduck: 1983,The Fifth Generation: Artificial Intelligence and Japan's Computer Challenge to the World, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.
Foden, Harry G.: 1989 (Spring), ‘Technological Trends and Economic Development,’Economic Development Review 7, 8–14.
Gabor, Dennis: 1969, ‘Normative Technological Forecasting,’Technological Forecasting 1, 1–3.
Gross, Alan: 1990,The Rhetoric of Science, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
Hart, Hornell: 1946, ‘Technological Acceleration and the Atomic Bomb,’American Sociological Review 11, 277–293.
Helmer, Olaf and Nicholas Rescher: 1959 (Oct.), ‘On the Epistemology of the Inexact Sciences,’Management Science 6, 25–52.
Isenson, Raymond S.: 1966 (Oct.), ‘Technological Forecasting in Perspective,’Management Science 13, B-70–B-83.
Jantsch, Erich: 1967 (Oct.), ‘Forecasting the Future,’Science Journal 3, 40–55.
Johnston, R.D.: 1972, ‘The Internal Structure of Technology,’The Sociology of Science, Sociological Review Monograph 18, (ed.), Paul Halmos, Keele, Staffordshire, University of Keele, 117–130.
Kerferd, G. B.: 1981,The Sophistic Movement, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Kiefer, David M.: 1969 (11 Aug.), ‘The Futures Business,’Chemical and Engineering News 47, 62–75.
Layton, Edwin T., Jr.: 1974, ‘Technology as Knowledge,’Technology and Culture 15, 31–41.
Lehner, Urban C.: 1981 (25 Sept.), ‘Japan Starting 10-Year Effort to Create Exotic Computer,’Wall Street Journal 198, 35.
Lenz, Ralph C.: 1968, ‘Forecasts of Exploding Technologies by Trend Extrapolation,’ in Bright (ed.), 57–76.
Lessing, Lawrence: 1967 (Jan.), ‘Where the Industries of the Seventies Will Come From,’Fortune 75, pp. 96–98 and 192.
Lovewell, P. J. and R. D. Bruce: 1963 (15 Feb.), ‘How We Predict Technological Change,’New Scientist 13, 370–373.
Martino, Joseph P.: 1972a, ‘Preface’ to Martino (ed.),An Introduction to Technological Forecasting, London, Gordon and Breach, vii-viii.
Martino, Joseph P.: 1972b, ‘Forecasting the Progress of Technology,’ in Martino (ed.), 13–23.
Martino, Joseph P.: 1987, ‘Using Precursors as Leading Indicators of Technological Change,’Technological Forecasting and Social Change 32, 341–360.
Miller, Carolyn R.: 1992, ‘Kairos in the Rhetoric of Science,’ in Steven P. Witte, Neil Nakadate, and Roger Cherry (eds.),A Rhetoric of Doing: Essays Honoring James L. Kinneavy, Southern Illinois University Press, 310–327.
Nelson, Richard R. and Sidney G. Winter: 1977, ‘In Search of Useful Theory of Innovation,’Research Policy 6, 36–76.
Onians, Richard Broxton: 1951,The Origins of European Thought about the Body, the Mind, the Soul, the World, Time, and Fate, New York, Arno, 1973.
Pacey, Arnold: 1983,The Culture of Technology, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Porter, Alan L., A. Thomas Roper, Thomas W. Mason, Frederick A. Rossini, Jerry Banks, and Bradley J. Wiederholt: 1991,Forecasting and Management of Technology, New York, Wiley.
Prelli, Lawrence J.: 1989,A Rhetoric of Science: Inventing Scientific Discourse, Columbia, SC, University of South Carolina Press.
Price, Derek J. de S.: 1969, ‘The Structures of Publication in Science and Technology,’ in William H. Gruber and Donald G. Marquis (eds.),Factors in the Transfer of Technology, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press, 91–104.
Price, Derek J. de S.: 1986,Little Science, Big Science ... and Beyond, Columbia University Press.
Poulakos, John: 1983, ‘Toward a Sophistic Definition of Rhetoric,’Philosophy and Rhetoric 16, 35–48.
Quinn, James Bryan: 1967, ‘Technological Forecasting,’Harvard Business Review 45, 89–106.
Rescher, Nicholas: 1978,Scientific Progress: A Philosophical Essay on the Economics of Research in Natural Science, Pittsburgh, PA, University of Pittsburgh Press.
Ritter, Don (Republican Congressman from Pennsylvania): 1989 (7, March), Hearings before the Subcommittee on Science, Research and Technology of the Committee on Space, Science, and Technology, U.S. House of Representatives, 101st Congress, No. 16.
Sanders, Ralph: 1987, ‘Penetrating the Fog of Technology's Social Dimensions,’Technology in Society 9, 163–180.
Skolimowski, Henryk: 1966, ‘The Structure of Thinking in Technology,’Technology and Culture 7, 371–383.
Spencer, Herbert: 1857, ‘Progress: Its Law and Cause’; rpt.Essays: Scientific, Political, and Speculative, Vol. 1. 1891; rpt.Works, Vol. 13, Osnabruck: Otto Zeller, 1966, 8–62.
Swager, William L.: 1966 (July), ‘Technological Forecasting for Practical Planning,’Petroleum Management 38, 61–67.
Untersteiner, Mario: 1954,The Sophists, Trans. Kathleen Freeman, Oxford, Blackwell.
Vatz, Richard E.: 1973, ‘The Myth of the Rhetorical Situation,’Philosophy and Rhetoric 6, 154–161.
Vincenti, Walter G.: 1990,What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press.
Watts, Susan and Michael Cross: 1988 (3 Dec.), ‘Japan's Fifth-Generation Failure,’New Scientist 120, 25.
Winner, Langdon: 1977,Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought, Cambridge MA, MIT Press.
Wood, Robert Chapman: 1988, ‘The Real Challenge of Japan's Fifth Generation Project,’Technology Review 91, 67–73.
Yasaki, Edward K.: 1982 (Jan.), ‘Tokyo Looks to the 90s,Datamation 28(1), 110–115.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, C.R. Opportunity, opportunism, and progress:Kairos in the rhetoric of technology. Argumentation 8, 81–96 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00710705
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00710705