Skip to main content
Log in

Response to Boyd's Commentary

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

REFERENCES

  • Millikan, R.G. (1984): Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G. (1984): ‘On Unclear and Indistinct Ideas’, in J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives vol. VIII, 75–100, Ascadero CA: Ridgeview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R.G. (1998a): ‘A Common Structure for Concepts of Individuals, Stuffs, and Basic Kinds: More Mama, More Milk and More Mouse’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22.1 (Feb 1998). Reprinted in E. Margolis and S. Laurence (eds.), Concepts: Core Readings, MIT Press, 1998.

  • Millikan, R.G. (1998b): ‘With Enemies Like this I Don't Need Friends: Author's Response:’ [to commentaries on ‘A Common Structures...’ (above)] Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22.1 (Feb).

  • Millikan, R.G. (1998c): ‘How We Make Our Ideas Clear’, The Tenth Annual Patick Romanell Lecture, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, November 1998, pp. 65–79.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Millikan, R.G. Response to Boyd's Commentary. Philosophical Studies 95, 99–102 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004563423971

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004563423971

Navigation