Abstract
The quantum mechanical formalism which was discovered by Heisenberg [1] and Schrödinger [2] in 1925 was first interpreted by Born [3] in a statistical sense. The formal expressions p(φ, a i ) = |(φ, φ ai )|2 , i ∈ ℕ are interpreted as the probabilities to find the value a i after the measurement of the observable A of the system S with preparation φ. In this improved version the statistical or ‘Born interpretation’ is used in the present day literature. Usually the statistical (Born) interpretation of quantum mechanics is taken for granted and the formalism of quantum mechanics is considered as a theory which provides statistical predictions. On the other hand, the meaning of the same formal terms p(φ, a i ) for an individual system is highly problematic. Heisenberg [4] tried to understand the meaning of the terms p(φ, a i ) for a single system by means of the Aristotelian concept of ‘potentia’. Popper introduced for the same reason the new concept of ‘propensity’. However, since both attempts to understand probability on the individual level don’t give rise to any observable prediction, in the current literature the individualistic interpretation of quantum mechanics is not considered as an alternative which should be taken seriously.
Keywords
- Objective Property
- Pointer Objectification
- Individual System
- Compound System
- Individualistic Interpretation
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Heisenberg, W.: 1925, ‘Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen’, Zeitschrift für Physik, 33, 879–893.
Schrödinger, E.: 1926, E.: 1926, ‘Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem’, Annalen der Physik, 79, 36 1376.
Born, M.: 1926 ) ‘Zur Quantenmechanik der Stoßvorgänge’, Zeitschrift für Physik, 37, 863867.
Heisenberg, W.: 1959, ‘Die Plancksche Entdeckung und die physikalischen Probleme der Atomphysik’, Universitas, 14, 135–148.
Busch, P., Lahti, P., Mittelstaedt, P 1991, The Quantum Theory of Measurement Springer, Heidelberg, 2nd ed.,1995.
Mittelstaedt, P 1993, ‘The Measuring Process and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics’, Int J Theor Phys,32 1763–1775.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N.: 1935, ‘Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?’, Phys Rev, 32, 777–780.
Popper, R.K.: 1957, The Propensity Interpretation of the Calculus of Probability and the Quantum Theory, in Körner, S., ed., Observation and Interpretation in the Philosophy of Physics. Butterworth, London.
Sklar, L.: 1970, ‘Is Probability a Dispositional Property’, J Philosophy, 67, 355–366.
Giere, R.: 1973, Objective Single-Case Probabilities, in Suppes, P. et al,eds., Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science 457–483.
Schneider, C.: 1994, ‘Two Interpretations of Objective Probabilities’, Philosophia Naturalis, 31, 107–131.
Popper, R.K.: 1982, Quantum Theory and the Schism of Physics, Postscript III to the Logic of Scientific Discovery, Bartley, W.W. III, ed. Hutchinson, London, Melbourne 1988.
Everett, H.: 1957, The Theory of the Universal Wave Function Theses. Princeton University. Reprinted in DeWitt, B.S., Graham, N., eds., The Many Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton N.Y. 1973; 1–140.
Finkelstein, D.: 1962, The Logic of Quantum Physics, Transactions of the New York Academy of Science, 25, 621–637.
Hartle, J.B.: 1968 ) Quantum Mechanics of Individual Systems, Am JPhys, 36, 704–712.
Graham, N.: 1973, The Measurement of Relative Frequency, in DeWitt, B.S., Graham, N., eds., The Many—Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton N.Y; 229–252.
DeWitt, B.S.: 1971, The Many-Universes Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, in Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. IL Corso, Academic Press, New York; 167–218.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mittelstaedt, P. (1999). Individualistic Versus Statistical Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. In: Chiara, M.L.D., Giuntini, R., Laudisa, F. (eds) Language, Quantum, Music. Synthese Library, vol 281. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2043-4_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-2043-4_21
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-5229-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-017-2043-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive