Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Problem of Natural Inequality: A New Problem of Evil

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that there is a kind of evil, namely, the unequal distribution of natural endowments, or natural inequality, which presents theists with a new evidential (not logical or incompatibility) problem of evil. The problem of natural inequality is a new evidential problem of evil not only because, to the best of my knowledge, it has not yet been discussed in the literature, but also because available theodicies, such the free will defense and the soul-making defense, are not adequate responses in the face of this particular evil, or so I argue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. According to Poston (2012, pp. 166–185), the natural/moral evil distinction goes back to Augustine.

  2. See also van Inwagen (2006, p. 9) on natural or physical evil.

  3. Cf. two recent discussions of the problem of evil: Adams, R. M. (2006) and Adams M. M. (2011).

  4. According to Lobo and Zhaurova (2008), “Every year, an estimated 7.9 million infants (6 % of worldwide births) are born with serious birth defects.”

  5. According to the World Health Organization, seventy years was the average life expectancy at birth of the global population in 2011 (http://www.who.int/gho/mortality_burden_disease/life_tables/situation_trends/en/).

References

  • Adams, M. M. (2011). Julian of Norwich: problems of evil and the seriousness of Sin. Philosophia, 39, 433–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. (1983). Divine necessity. Journal of Philosophy, 80, 741–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R. M. (2006). Love and the problem of evil. Philosophia, 34, 243–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J., & Perszyk, K. (2011). The normatively relativized logical argument from evil. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 70, 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, K. (2011). Non-moral evil and the free will defense. Faith and Philosophy, 28, 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S. (1983). Logic and the Nature of God. Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, T. (2011). Recent work on the problem of evil. Analysis, 71, 560–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everitt, N. (2010). The divine attributes. Philosophy Compass, 5, 78–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint, T. P. (1998). Divine Providence: The Molinist Account. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, R. (1991). On the Existence and Nature of God. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hick, J. (1966). Evil and the God of Love. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C. S. (1957). The Problem of Pain. London: Fontana Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobo, I., & Zhaurova, K. (2008) Birth defects: causes and statistics. Nature Education 1(1), http://www.nature.com/scitable/topicpage/birth-defects-causes-and-statistics-863.

  • MacDonald, S. (Ed.). (1991). Being and Goodness. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, E., & Hare, P. (1968). Evil and the Concept of God. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, H. J. (2012). Divine Providence. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2012 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/providence-divine/.

  • Mizrahi, M. (2013). New puzzles about divine attributes. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 5(2).

  • Morris, T. (1987). Perfect being theology. Noûs, 21, 19–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, A. (1974a). God, Freedom, and Evil. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, A. (1974b). The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga, A. (1980). Does God Have a Nature? Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato. (1997). In E. Hamilton & H. Cairns (Eds.), Collected Dialogues. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poston, T. (2012). Social Evil. In J. L. Kvanvig (Ed.), Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion (Vol. V, pp. 166–185). Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice (Revisedth ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (2001). In E. Kelly (Ed.), Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, K. A. (2000). Perfect Being Theology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, R. (1996). Is There a God? New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, R. (2003). Providence and the Problem of Evil. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne, R. (2004). The Existence of God (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Inwagen, P. (2006). The Problem of Evil. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wierenga, E. (1989). The Nature of God. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Marcus Arvan, Elisa Freschi, Daniel Greco, David Morrow, and Walter Riker for helpful discussion. I am also grateful to an anonymous reviewer of Philosophia for helpful comments on earlier drafts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moti Mizrahi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mizrahi, M. The Problem of Natural Inequality: A New Problem of Evil. Philosophia 42, 127–136 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-013-9478-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-013-9478-6

Keywords

Navigation