Abstract
The dominant framing of the political corporate social responsibility (CSR) discussion challenges the traditional economic conception of the firm and aims to produce a paradigm shift in CSR studies wherein the traditional, apolitical view of corporations’ roles in society is replaced by the political conception of CSR. In this paper, we show how the major framing of the political CSR discussion calls for a redirection to take international hard legal and moral regulations, as well as the need for the boundaries between business and politics into account.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In this paper, terms such as “liberal” and “republican” refer to the schools of thought in political philosophy. Thus, our use of these terms is different from everyday political language in the USA where “liberal” often refers to the “leftist” and “republican” to “right wing” political positions.
Naturally, not all political economies are regulated market economies and we also have conceptions of society where there are no real boundaries between the political and economic spheres of society (e.g., communism or anarcho-capitalism) or where the boundaries between the political and business spheres of society are, to a large extent, blurred (e.g., market socialism or libertarianism).
References
Banerjee, S. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Barth, J. R., Caprio, G, Jr, & Levine, R. (2012). Guardians of finance. Making regulators work for us. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Commodity Futures Modernization Act of 2000, Wikipedia.
Corn, D. (2008). Foreclosure Phil. Mother Jones (July/August issue). Retrieved from http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2008/05/foreclosure-phi.
Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics: A European perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Corporations and citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crocker, D. (2006). Sen and deliberative democracy. In A. Kaufman (Ed.), Capabilities equality: Basic issues and problems (pp. 155–197). New York: Routledge.
Dagger, R. (2006). Neo-republicanism and the civic economy. Philosophy, Politics and Economics, 5, 151–173.
Dubbink, W. (2004). The fragile structure of free-market society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14, 23–46.
Freeman, S. (2007). Rawls. London: Routledge.
Freeman, R. E., & Phillips, R. A. (2002). Stakeholder theory: A libertarian defense. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 331–349.
Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine (September 13), 32–33, 122–124.
Ghemawat, P. (2007). Redefining global strategy: Crossing borders in a world where differences still matter. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Ghemawat, P. (2010). World 3.0: Global prosperity and how to achieve it. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.
Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums. London: Penguin.
Green, H. (2010). The company town: The industrial edens and satanic mills that shaped the American economy. New York: Basic Books.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1944). The road to serfdom. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Healy, P. M., & Palepu, K. G. (2003). The fall of Enron. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 3–26.
Hennchen, E., & Lozano, J. (2012). Mind the gap: Royal Dutch Shell’s sustainability agenda in Nigeria. Retrieved from http://www.oikos-international.org/academic/case-collection/inspection-copies/alphabetical-list/shell.html.
Hirst, P., Thompson, G., & Bromley, S. (2009). Globalization in question (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jensen, M. C. (2002). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12, 235–256.
Jensen, M. C. (2008). From conflict to cooperation for promotion of the common good. In dialogue: Towards superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(2), 153–190.
Jones, B. (2007). Citizens, partners or patrons? Corporate power and patronage capitalism. Journal of Civil Society, 3, 159–177.
Keskisarja, T. (2010). Vihreän kullan kirous. G. A. Serlachiuksen elämä ja afäärit. Helsinki, Finland: Siltala.
Kettunen, P. (1994). Suojelu, suoritus, subjekti. Työsuojelu teollistuvan Suomen yhteiskunnallisissa ajattelu-ja toimintatavoissa. Historiallisia tutkimuksia 189. Helsinki, Finland: SHS.
Kettunen, P. (2008). Globalisaatio ja kansallinen me. Tampere, Finland: Vastapaino.
Kinderman, D. (2012). ‘Free us up so we can be responsible’' The co-evolution of Corporate Social Responsibility and neo-liberalism in the UK, 1977–2010. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 29–57.
Kobrin, S. J. (2001). Sovereignty @bay: Globalization, multinational enterprise, and the international political system. In A. M. Rugman & T. L. Brewer (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international business (pp. 181–205). New York: Oxford University Press.
Koivuniemi, J. (2000). Tehtaan pillin tahdissa. Nokian tehdasyhdyskunnan sosiaalinen järjestys 1870–1939. Helsinki, Finland: SKS.
Kollmeyer, C. J. (2003). Globalization, class compromise, and American exceptionalism: Political change in 16 advanced capitalist countries. Critical Sociology, 29, 369–391.
Koskinen, T. (2001). Suomi metsäsektoriyhteiskuntana. Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki School of Economics.
Krouse, R., & McPherson, M. (1988). Capitalism, “property-owning democracy”, and the welfare state. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Democracy and the welfare state (pp. 79–106). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kuisma, M. (1993). Metsäteollisuuden maa: Suomi, metsät ja kansainvälinen järjestelmä 1620–1920. Helsinki, Finland: SHS.
Kuisma, M. (2009). Suomen poliittinen taloushistoria 1000–2000. Helsinki, Finland: Siltala.
Kymlicka, W. (2002). Contemporary political philosophy. An introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lindgreen, A., Maon, F., Reast, J., & Yani-De-Soriano, M. (2012). Guest editorial: Corporate social responsibility in controversial industry sectors. Journal of Business Ethics, 110, 393–395.
Lipton, E. (2008). Gramm and the ‘Enron Loophole’. The New York Times (November 17, 2008). Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/.
Mackey, A., Mackey, T. B., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: investor relations and corporate strategies. Academy of Management Review, 32, 817–835.
Marglit, A. (1996). The decent society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.
Mark-Ungericht, B., & Weiskopf, R. (2007). Filling the empty shell. The public debate on CSR in Austria as a paradigmatic example of a political discourse. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 285–297.
Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30, 166–179.
Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.
Meade, J. (1964). Equality, efficiency, and the ownership of property. London: Allen and Unwin.
Miller, C. (2007). Niagara falling. Globalization in a small town. Plymouth, UK: Lexington Books, Rowman & Littlefield.
Mäkinen, J., & Räsänen, P. (2011). Extended corporate citizenship: A libertarian interpretation. EJBP, 16(2), 6–11.
Mäkinen, J., & Kourula, A. (2012). Pluralism in political corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(4), 649–678.
Mäkinen, J., & Kourula, A. (2014). Globalization, national politics and corporate social responsibility. In R. Tainio, S. Meriläinen, J. Mäkinen & M. Laihonen (Eds.), Limits to globalization: National borders still matter (pp. 219–235). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
Mönkkönen, M. (1992). Mäntän historia 1860–1947. Jyväskylä, Finland: Gummerus.
Montgomery, D. (Ed.). (1998). Patronage, Paternalism, and Company Welfare. International Labor and Working-Class History (Vol. 53). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Nagel, T. (1991). Equality and partiality. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Norrmén, P. H. (1993). Mäntän tehdas 1868–1928. G. A. Serlachius Osakeyhtiön Muistojulkaisu. Jyväskylä, Finland: Gummerus.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441.
Palkkatyöläinen, Teema: Mäntän historiaa. Retrieved April 25, 2006, from http://www.palkkatyolainen.fi/pt2006/pt0604/p060425-t2.html.
Pettit, P. (1996). Freedom as antipower. Ethics, 106, 576–604.
Phillips, R. A., & Margolis, J. D. (1999). Toward an ethics of organizations. Business Ethics Quarterly, 9(4), 619–638.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society. The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 77–92.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89, 62–77.
Raith, D. (2013). Mythos CSR: Zur verwertung von verantwortung und beratung. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1996). Political liberalism (with a new introduction and the “reply to Habermas”). New York: Columbia University Press.
Rawls, J. (2001). Justice as fairness: A restatement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press (edited by E. Kelly).
Richardson, H. (2002). Democratic autonomy: Public reasoning about the ends of policy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Roberts, D. (1979). Paternalism in early Victorian England. London: Croom Held.
Sandel, M. J. (2012). What money can’t buy: The moral limits of markets. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Satz, D. (2010). Why some things should not be for sale: The moral limits of markets. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Scheffler, S. (2005). The division of moral labour: Egalitarian liberalism as moral pluralism. Proceeding of the Aristotelian Society, supplementary 79, 229–253.
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1096–1120.
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Introduction: Corporate citizenship in a globalized world. In A. G. Scherer & G. Palazzo (Eds.), Handbook of research on global corporate citizenship (pp. 1–24). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors: Toward a new role of the transnational corporation in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 505–532.
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2009). Introduction to the special issue: Globalization as a challenge for business responsibilities. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3), 327–347.
Shamir, R. (2008). The age of responsibilization: On market-embedded morality. Economy and Society, 37(1), 1–19.
Shenkar, O. (1996). The firm as a total institution: Reflections on the Chinese state enterprise. Organization Studies, 17, 885–907.
Sivonen, P. (Ed.). (2004). Under the eagle’s wings. Mänttä, Finland: Göstä Serlachius Fine Arts Foundation.
Stout, L. A. (2011). Derivatives and the legal origin of the 2008 credit crisis. Harvard Business Law Review, 1, 1–38.
Sundaram, A. K., & Inkpen, A. C. (2004). The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15, 350–363.
Sunstein, C. (1988). Beyond the republican revival. Yale Law Journal, 97, 1539–1590.
The Financial Crisis Inquiry Report, Official Government Edition, January 2011.
Thomas, A. (2012). Liberal republicanism and the idea of an Egalitarian ethos. In M. O’Neill & T. Williamson (Eds.), Property-owning democracy: Rawls and beyond (pp. 101–128). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Vogel, D. (2005). The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC.: Brookings Institution Press.
Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.
Whelan, G. (2012). The political perspective on corporate social responsibility: a critical agenda. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22, 709–737.
White, T. (2012). Property-owning democracy and republican citizenship. In M. O’Neill & T. Williamson (Eds.), Property-owning democracy: Rawls and beyond (pp. 129–146). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Acknowledgments
The authors are indebted to two anonymous reviewers for their insightful and very helpful reviews and guidance. The paper has been presented at various conferences and research seminars at Aalto University School of Business, University of Helsinki, SCANCOR at Stanford University, ESADE Business School, EBEN Annual Conference 2013, Society for Business Ethics Annual Meeting 2013. We thank participants in these conferences and research seminars for their comments on earlier versions of this paper. In particular we would like to thank Martha Nussbaum, Esther Hennchen, Jennifer Goodman, Arno Kourula, Sareh Pouryousefi, Ben Wempe, Pasi Heikkurinen and Udo Zander for their valuable comments and support. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Liikesivistysrahasto - The Foundation for Economic Education, Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation, and Helsinki School of Economics Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mäkinen, J., Kasanen, E. Boundaries Between Business and Politics: A Study on the Division of Moral Labor. J Bus Ethics 134, 103–116 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2419-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2419-x