Skip to main content
Log in

Is Tu Wei-ming Confucian?

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tu Wei-ming’s discourse has been badly understood by some Western philosophers who study Confucianism. I suggest that this misunderstanding stems from the fact that these philosophers fail to realize that Confucian discourse is in an entirely different register from Western philosophical discourse. I then propose my own preliminary definition of Confucian discourse in five points and present a structural analysis of a text by Tu Wei-ming. Finally, I consider which features of Tu’s discourse can properly be called Confucian. The answer to this question reflects not only on Tu but also on Confucian discourse and the study of Confucianism in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, Roger T. 2002. “Thinking through Comparisons: Analytic and Narrative Methods for Cultural Understanding.” In Early China/Ancient Greece: Thinking Through Comparisons. Edited by Steven Shankman and Stephen W. Durrant. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Wing-tsit (ed). 1983. Detailed Exposition and Commentary on W ang Yangming’s Practical Instructions 王陽明《傳習錄》詳注集評. Taipei 臺北: Xuesheng Shuju 學生書局.

  • Cheng, Chung-ying. 2003. “Philosophy: Recent Trends Overseas.” In Encyclopedia of Chinese Philosophy. Edited by Antonio S. Cua. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Chad. 2004. “The Normative Impact of Comparative Ethics: Human Rights.” In Confucian Ethics: A Comparative Study of Self, Autonomy, and Community. Edited by Kwong-Loi Shun and David B. Wong. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jullien, François. 2000. Detour and Access: Strategies of Meaning in China and Greece. Translated by Sophie Hawkes. New York: Zone Books.

  • Knoblock, John. 1990. Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works, Vol. 2. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kierkegaard, Søren. 1941. Concluding Unscientific Postscript. Translated by David Swenson and Walter Lowrie. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

  • Lewis, Mark Edward. 1999. Writing and Authority in Early China. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Møllgaard, Eske. 2004. “Doctrine and Discourse in Wang Yangming’s Essay ‘Pulling up the Root and Stopping up the Source’.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 31.3: 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville, Robert Cummings. 2003. “Response to Bryan W. Van Norden’s Review of Boston Confucianism.” Philosophy East & West 53.3: 413–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu Wei-ming. 1990. “The Confucian Tradition in Chinese History.” In Heritage of China: Contemporary Perspectives on Chinese Civilization. Edited by Paul S. Ropp. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • _______. 1998. “Beyond the Enlightenment Mentality.” In Confucianism and Ecology: The Interrelation of Heaven, Earth, and Humans. Edited by Mary Evelyn Tucker and John Berthrong. Harvard University Center for the Study of World Religions Publications. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

  • Van Norden, Brian W. 2003. Review of Robert Cummings Neville, Boston Confucianism: Portable Tradition in the Late-Modern World. Philosophy East & West 53.3: 417–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eske Møllgaard.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Møllgaard, E. Is Tu Wei-ming Confucian?. Dao 6, 397–411 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-007-9023-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-007-9023-z

Keywords

Navigation