Skip to main content

Probabilities in Branching Structures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective ((PSEP,volume 2))

Abstract

A common, natural view about probabilities, shared by philosophers of diverse persuasions, is that probabilities are graded possibilities. On this view, which I will presuppose, there are no probabilities without underlying possibilities, and there is room for different notions of probability at least to the extent that there are different underlying notions of possibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Belnap, N. (1992). Branching space-time. Synthese, 92:385–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N. (1999). Concrete transitions. In Meggle, G., editor, Actions, Norms, Values: Discussions with Georg Henrik von Wright, pages 227–236. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N. (2002a). Double time references: Speech-act reports as modalities in an indeterminist setting. In Wolter, F., Wansing, H., de Rijke, M., and Zakharyaschev, M., editors, Advances in Modal Logic, Vol. 3, pages 37–58. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N. (2002b). EPR-like “funny business” in the theory of branching spacetimes. In Placek, T. and Butterfield, J., editors, Non-locality and Modality, pages 293–315. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N. (2003). No-common-cause EPR-like funny business in branching space-times. Philosophical Studies, 114:199–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N. (2005). A theory of causation: Causae causantes (originating causes) as inus conditions in branching space-times. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56:221–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belnap, N. (2007). Propensities and probabilities. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 38(3):593–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, K. (2005). Modality and Tense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gabbay, D. and Guenthner, F., editors (1984). Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. II. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCall, S. (1990). Choice trees. In Dunn, J. and Gupta, A., editors, Truth or Consequences. Essays in Honor of Nuel Belnap, pages 231–244. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, T. (2005). Probability theory and causation: A branching space-times analysis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 56:487–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, T., Belnap, N., and Kishida, K. (2008). Funny business in branching spacetimes: infinite modal correlations. Synthese, 164:141–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1982). Quantum Theory and the Schism of Physics. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, A. N. (1957). Time and Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, A. N. (1967). Past, Present and Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, R. H. (1984). Combinations of tense and modality. In Gabbay and Guenthner (1984), pages 135–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Fraassen, B. (1980). The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • von Wright, G. H. (1963). Norm and Action. A Logical Inquiry. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, M. and Belnap, N. (2006). How causal probabilities might fit into our objectively indeterministic world. Synthese, 149:1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, H. (1940). The ghost of modality. In Farber, M., editor, Philosophical Essays in Memory of Edmund Husserl, pages 278–303. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the audience and my co-symposiasts at the ESF Workshop Physical and Philosophical Perspectives on Probability, Explanation and Time, Zeist, 20 October 2009, for helpful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Müller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Müller, T. (2011). Probabilities in Branching Structures. In: Dieks, D., Gonzalez, W., Hartmann, S., Uebel, T., Weber, M. (eds) Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation. The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1180-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics