Abstract
The chapter considers the relation between language and logic in early Daoism. It explains the Daoist experience of language, which is closely related to the Daoist experience of the Way (dao). It is shown how Daoist logic differs from the Confucian logic of correctness and the Mohist logic of naming. Even if Daoist discourse does not follow these more familiar forms of logic, it does not negate the law of non-contradiction nor does it fall into the performative contradiction. Through readings of significant Daoist stories the Daoist logic beyond logic is brought to view.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agamben, Giorgio. 2000. “Language and History: Linguistic and Historical Categories in Benjamin’s Thought.” In Daniel Heller-Roazen ed. and trans., Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2011. The Sacrament of Language: An Archaeology of the Oath. Translated by Adam Kotsko. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Aristotle. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle, edited by Jonathan Barnes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cassin, Barbara ed. 2014. Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Cui, Dahua 崔大華. 2012. Zhuangzi qijie 庄子歧解 (Divergent interpretations of the Zhuangzi). Beijing: Zhonghua.
Fang, Yong 方勇. 2012. Zhuangzi zuanyao 莊子纂要 (Collected material for the Zhuangzi), 8 volumes. Beijing: Xueyuan.
Gadamer, H. G. 1991. Plato’s Dialectical Ethics: Phenomenological Interpretations Relating to the Philebus, translated by R. M. Wallace. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Graham, A. C. 1978. Later Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.
Graham, A. C. 1981. Chuang-tzu: The Inner Chapters. London: Allan and Unwin.
Graham, A. C. 1989. Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China. La Salle: Open Court.
Hadot, Pierre. 2004. What is Ancient Philosophy. translated by Michael Chase. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Hansen, Chad. 1992. A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Harbsmeier, Christoph. 1993. “Conceptions of Knowledge in Ancient China,” In Hans Lenk and Gregor Paul, eds., Epistemological Issues in Classical Chinese Philosophy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Harbsmeier, Christoph. 1998. Science and Civilisation in China, vol. 7, part 1, Language and Logic in China, edited by Joseph Needham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heidegger, Martin. 2009. “Indication of the Hermeneutical Situation.” In The Heidegger Reader, edited by Günter Figal, translated by Jerome Veith. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Johnston, Ian trans. 2014. Mo Zi: The Book of Master Mo. London: Penguin Books.
Kroll, Paul W. 2015. A Student’s Dictionary of Classical and Medieval Chinese. Leiden: Brill.
Watson, Burton. 1968. The Complete Works of Chuang Tzu. New York: Columbia University Press.
Zhuangzi. 2000. Zhuangzi zhuzi suoyin 莊子逐字索引 (A Concordance to the Zhuangzi, the ICS Ancient Chinese Texts Concordance Series). Hong Kong: The Commercial Press.
Ziporyn, Brook. 2009. Zhuangzi: The Essential Writings. Indianapolis: Hackett.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Møllgaard, E.J. (2020). Problems of Language and Logic in Daoism. In: Fung, Ym. (eds) Dao Companion to Chinese Philosophy of Logic. Dao Companions to Chinese Philosophy, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29033-7_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29033-7_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-29031-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-29033-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)