Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics (Aug 2022)

PEERING, VIEWING AND REVIEWING: WHAT MAKES A PEER REVIEW GOOD

  • Mohini,
  • Sakir Ahmed

DOI
https://doi.org/10.47316/cajmhe.2022.3.2.05
Journal volume & issue
Vol. 3, no. 2
pp. 119 – 124

Abstract

Read online

Peer review is an integral part of an ethical scientific publication process. Though not perfect, it has not been replaceable in the last couple of centuries since the advent of scientific journals. Recent innovations include online anonymized credits for peer review that can be used to augment an academician’s resume. Submissions and retraction are ever growing, increasing the demands from peer reviewers. The rewards may not seem commensurate but any person of science should contribute to peer review as a guardian of science. This short review looks at the ideal peer review along with inherent challenges. It makes suggestions on how novice and intermediate reviewers can improve their contributions as well as introduces various resources relevant for peer review.

Keywords