Skip to main content
Log in

McTaggart and Modern Physics

  • Published:
Philosophia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper delves into McTaggart’s metaphysical account of reality without time, and compares and contrasts McTaggart’s account with the account of reality given by modern physics. This comparison is of interest, because there are suggestions from contemporary physics that there is no time at the fundamental level. Physicists and philosophers of physics recognize that we do not have a good understanding of how the world could be such that time is unreal. I argue that, from the perspective of one who is trying to understand modern physics, McTaggart’s metaphysical views do provide some insight into how reality can be timeless at the fundamental level, but the insight that they provide is limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For a proof of this, see Hawking and Ellis 1973, 189–90.

  2. See Spergel et al. 2003 and Bennett et al. 2003. For an accessible discussion, see NASA (2007). To be precise, the evidence is that on a large scale, the universe is spatially flat. It is mathematically possible for the universe to be spatially flat and yet finite (as explained by for example Heckmann and Schücking (1962, 441–2)), but such non-standard topologies are usually rejected by physicists. In addition to the empirical evidence, there is theoretical support for the hypothesis that the universe is spatially infinite. Most versions of inflationary cosmology make this prediction, as explained by Linde (2000, 584–6).

  3. John Earman (2002) also suggests parallels between McTaggart and general relativity, but his argument does not take into account McTaggart’s actual views on the nature of the C-series.

References

  • Albert, D. Z., & Loewer, B. (1988). Interpreting the many-worlds interpretation. Synthese, 77, 195–213. doi:10.1007/BF00869434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, J. (1994). The emergence of time and its arrow from timelessness. In J. Halliwell, J. Pérez-Mercader & W. H. Zurek (Eds.), Physical origins of time asymmetry (pp. 405–414). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, J. (2001). The end of time: the next revolution in physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, C. L., et al. (2003). First-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: preliminary maps and basic results. The Astrophysical Journal. Supplement Series, 148, 1–27. doi:10.1086/377253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J. (2002). Thoroughly modern McTaggart, or, what McTaggart would have said if he had read the general theory of relativity. Philosophers’ Imprint, 2. http://www.philosophersimprint.org/002003/.

  • Gott, J. R. (2001). Time travel in Einstein’s universe. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawking, S. W., & Ellis, G. F. R. (1973). The large scale structure of space-time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heckmann, O., & Schücking, E. (1962). Relativistic cosmology. In L. Witten (Ed.), Gravitation: An introduction to current research (pp. 438–469). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linde, A. (2000). Inflationary cosmology. Physics Reports, 333–334, 575–591. doi:10.1016/S0370-1573(00)00038-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McTaggart, J. M. E. (1927). The nature of existence (Vol. II). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monton, B. (2007). Common-sense realism and the unimaginable otherness of science. Principia 11(2), 117–126. See also Monton, B. On dualistic interpretations of quantum mechanics. Preprint 2913 at http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu.

    Google Scholar 

  • NASA. (2007). Is the universe infinite? At http://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_shape.html, archived at http://www.webcitation.org/5bnkjQefh.

  • Spergel, D. N., et al. (2003). First-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) observations: determination of cosmological parameters. The Astrophysical Journal. Supplement Series, 148, 175–194. doi:10.1086/377226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Squires, E. (1990). Conscious mind in the physical world. Bristol: Adam Hilger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, J. A. (1994). Time today. In J. Halliwell, J. Pérez-Mercader & W. H. Zurek (Eds.), Physical origins of time asymmetry (pp. 1–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witten, E. (2001). Reflections on the fate of spacetime. In C. Callender & N. Huggett (Eds.), Physics meets philosophy at the Planck scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley Monton.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Monton, B. McTaggart and Modern Physics. Philosophia 38, 257–264 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-009-9212-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-009-9212-6

Keywords

Navigation